新来者:零售商的购买力是一个有利于共谋的因素吗?

M. Giannino
{"title":"新来者:零售商的购买力是一个有利于共谋的因素吗?","authors":"M. Giannino","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1719648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the 2008 Pricing of Pasta decision the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) condemned 26 pasta makers and two industry associations for carrying out price-fixing practices in the market for durum semolina pasta. In order to establish the cartel, the ICA relied on economic evidence indicating that the pasta producers had an incentive to collude because of the retailers’ buyer power. This was rather a controversial finding. Firstly, the retailers’ buyer power have been generally considered as a factor which is not conducive to collusion. Secondly, there were asymmetries between cartelists, as some of them were branded producers whereas the others were small undertakings or private labels. Thus the branded suppliers had a relevant seller power, and for them it was more rationale to opt for an aggressive pricing policy instead of colluding with their weaker competitors.","PeriodicalId":130313,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Kids on the Block: Is Retailers’ Buyer Power a Factor Conducive to Collusion?\",\"authors\":\"M. Giannino\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1719648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By the 2008 Pricing of Pasta decision the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) condemned 26 pasta makers and two industry associations for carrying out price-fixing practices in the market for durum semolina pasta. In order to establish the cartel, the ICA relied on economic evidence indicating that the pasta producers had an incentive to collude because of the retailers’ buyer power. This was rather a controversial finding. Firstly, the retailers’ buyer power have been generally considered as a factor which is not conducive to collusion. Secondly, there were asymmetries between cartelists, as some of them were branded producers whereas the others were small undertakings or private labels. Thus the branded suppliers had a relevant seller power, and for them it was more rationale to opt for an aggressive pricing policy instead of colluding with their weaker competitors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1719648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1719648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据2008年意大利面食定价决定,意大利竞争管理局(ICA)谴责了26家面食生产商和两个行业协会在硬粒粗粒面粉面食市场上实施价格操纵行为。为了建立卡特尔,ICA依靠经济证据表明,由于零售商的购买力,意大利面生产商有勾结的动机。这是一个颇有争议的发现。首先,零售商的购买力被普遍认为是不利于合谋的因素。其次,卡特尔之间存在不对称,因为其中一些是品牌生产商,而其他则是小型企业或私人品牌。因此,品牌供应商拥有相关的销售权,对他们来说,选择激进的定价政策,而不是与实力较弱的竞争对手勾结,是更合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Kids on the Block: Is Retailers’ Buyer Power a Factor Conducive to Collusion?
By the 2008 Pricing of Pasta decision the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) condemned 26 pasta makers and two industry associations for carrying out price-fixing practices in the market for durum semolina pasta. In order to establish the cartel, the ICA relied on economic evidence indicating that the pasta producers had an incentive to collude because of the retailers’ buyer power. This was rather a controversial finding. Firstly, the retailers’ buyer power have been generally considered as a factor which is not conducive to collusion. Secondly, there were asymmetries between cartelists, as some of them were branded producers whereas the others were small undertakings or private labels. Thus the branded suppliers had a relevant seller power, and for them it was more rationale to opt for an aggressive pricing policy instead of colluding with their weaker competitors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calculating Cartel Damages Data Collaboratives, Competition Law and the Governance of EU Data Spaces The Effectiveness of European Antitrust Fines Unfair Pricing and Standard Essential Patents A Reform Too Few or a Reform Too Many: Judicial Review, Appeals or a Prosecutorial System under the UK Competition Act 1998?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1