澳大利亚过去的税法政策与数字革命后的税法政策

S. Villios, Michael Blissenden, Paul Kenny
{"title":"澳大利亚过去的税法政策与数字革命后的税法政策","authors":"S. Villios, Michael Blissenden, Paul Kenny","doi":"10.53300/001c.21428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax policy advocates have long suggested an optimal tax system would be the most efficient tax regime but until recently it has been unobtainable. Technological developments increase the feasibility of this tax. The first half of this article explains how Australian tax policy has developed to date by looking at government commissioned and sanctioned reviews of the tax system. What becomes apparent is that reform measures aimed at achieving the tax policy goals of efficiency, equity and simplicity often involve a lowering of tax rates and a comprehensive tax base system.\n\nThe second half then explores the changes that have made the prospects of an optimal tax system more feasible and explores how evolving policy advice has moved in the direction of optimal tax theory. It is argued that this may involve proposals for reform centered on a less comprehensive tax base, increased tax rates as well as other departures from the traditional tax reform discussion","PeriodicalId":306257,"journal":{"name":"Revenue Law Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australia’s Tax Law Policy of the Past and that of the Post Digital Revolution\",\"authors\":\"S. Villios, Michael Blissenden, Paul Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.53300/001c.21428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tax policy advocates have long suggested an optimal tax system would be the most efficient tax regime but until recently it has been unobtainable. Technological developments increase the feasibility of this tax. The first half of this article explains how Australian tax policy has developed to date by looking at government commissioned and sanctioned reviews of the tax system. What becomes apparent is that reform measures aimed at achieving the tax policy goals of efficiency, equity and simplicity often involve a lowering of tax rates and a comprehensive tax base system.\\n\\nThe second half then explores the changes that have made the prospects of an optimal tax system more feasible and explores how evolving policy advice has moved in the direction of optimal tax theory. It is argued that this may involve proposals for reform centered on a less comprehensive tax base, increased tax rates as well as other departures from the traditional tax reform discussion\",\"PeriodicalId\":306257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revenue Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revenue Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.21428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revenue Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.21428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,税收政策倡导者一直认为,最优的税收制度将是最有效的税收制度,但直到最近,这种制度一直无法实现。技术的发展增加了这项税收的可行性。本文的前半部分通过观察政府委托和批准的税收制度审查,解释了澳大利亚税收政策迄今为止的发展情况。显而易见的是,旨在实现效率、公平和简单的税收政策目标的改革措施往往涉及降低税率和建立全面的税基制度。然后,第二部分探讨了使最优税收制度的前景更加可行的变化,并探讨了不断发展的政策建议如何朝着最优税收理论的方向发展。有人认为,这可能涉及以不太全面的税基为中心的改革建议,增加税率以及与传统税制改革讨论的其他背离
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Australia’s Tax Law Policy of the Past and that of the Post Digital Revolution
Tax policy advocates have long suggested an optimal tax system would be the most efficient tax regime but until recently it has been unobtainable. Technological developments increase the feasibility of this tax. The first half of this article explains how Australian tax policy has developed to date by looking at government commissioned and sanctioned reviews of the tax system. What becomes apparent is that reform measures aimed at achieving the tax policy goals of efficiency, equity and simplicity often involve a lowering of tax rates and a comprehensive tax base system. The second half then explores the changes that have made the prospects of an optimal tax system more feasible and explores how evolving policy advice has moved in the direction of optimal tax theory. It is argued that this may involve proposals for reform centered on a less comprehensive tax base, increased tax rates as well as other departures from the traditional tax reform discussion
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Botswana and Mauritius Exited the EU High-Risk Third Country List by Adapting Their Approaches to Beneficial Ownership and Residence A Curious Concession? Australia’s Withholding Tax Exemption for Franked Dividends Australian Transfer-Pricing in the Aftermath of Glencore Investment Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (2019) A Review of How America was Tricked on Tax Policy: Secrets and Undisclosed Practices by Bret N. Bogenschneider Australia’s Tax Law Policy of the Past and that of the Post Digital Revolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1