马来西亚电网系统重力储能适宜性探讨

Laya M.A. Al-Hilfi, S. Morris, Wong Jianhui, B. Venkatesh, Chew Kuew Wai, Chua Kein Huat
{"title":"马来西亚电网系统重力储能适宜性探讨","authors":"Laya M.A. Al-Hilfi, S. Morris, Wong Jianhui, B. Venkatesh, Chew Kuew Wai, Chua Kein Huat","doi":"10.1109/ICPEA53519.2022.9744647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A photovoltaic system is a part of the renewable energy family. The Photovoltaic system's operating principle is based on converting sun radiation directly into electricity and therefore it needs energy storage to accumulate the excess energy generated by the system to use in times of need. The most common energy storage type used in Malaysia is batteries (BESS), a short-term storage solution with many drawbacks such as a high yearly storage cost and negative environmental impact resulting from emitting carbon dioxide during operation and recycling stages. These disadvantages have inspired studying the benefits of a new energy storage technique proposed in the market, gravity energy storage system (GESS). The gravity energy storage has been discussed in the past couple of years as the perfect alternative to batteries with advantages of high-power capacity and low environmental impact. This study considers a small grid size energy generation system of less than 10 MW using a PV system and two types of energy storage, the BESS and GESS. The study also includes a comparison between BESS and GESS systems in terms of their power generation, storage capacity, carbon footprint, and usable capacity when connected to a built PV system. The outcome of the study shows that GESS has the potential to outweigh BESS making it a more suitable energy storage option for the PV system. The BES system results in a carbon dioxide footprint of 3199- 13710 g CO2-eq per battery with an operating cost much higher than that of the GESS system and a usable capacity lesser than the GESS system due to the depth of discharge (DoD) and round-trip efficiency. Nonetheless, the BESS has the advantage in terms of installation cost, as the GESS installation can cost up to 2.97 million MYR, while BESS costs 1.25 million MYR for a similar system.","PeriodicalId":371063,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference in Power Engineering Application (ICPEA)","volume":"1199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the Suitability of Gravity Energy Storage in Malaysian Grid Systems\",\"authors\":\"Laya M.A. Al-Hilfi, S. Morris, Wong Jianhui, B. Venkatesh, Chew Kuew Wai, Chua Kein Huat\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPEA53519.2022.9744647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A photovoltaic system is a part of the renewable energy family. The Photovoltaic system's operating principle is based on converting sun radiation directly into electricity and therefore it needs energy storage to accumulate the excess energy generated by the system to use in times of need. The most common energy storage type used in Malaysia is batteries (BESS), a short-term storage solution with many drawbacks such as a high yearly storage cost and negative environmental impact resulting from emitting carbon dioxide during operation and recycling stages. These disadvantages have inspired studying the benefits of a new energy storage technique proposed in the market, gravity energy storage system (GESS). The gravity energy storage has been discussed in the past couple of years as the perfect alternative to batteries with advantages of high-power capacity and low environmental impact. This study considers a small grid size energy generation system of less than 10 MW using a PV system and two types of energy storage, the BESS and GESS. The study also includes a comparison between BESS and GESS systems in terms of their power generation, storage capacity, carbon footprint, and usable capacity when connected to a built PV system. The outcome of the study shows that GESS has the potential to outweigh BESS making it a more suitable energy storage option for the PV system. The BES system results in a carbon dioxide footprint of 3199- 13710 g CO2-eq per battery with an operating cost much higher than that of the GESS system and a usable capacity lesser than the GESS system due to the depth of discharge (DoD) and round-trip efficiency. Nonetheless, the BESS has the advantage in terms of installation cost, as the GESS installation can cost up to 2.97 million MYR, while BESS costs 1.25 million MYR for a similar system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference in Power Engineering Application (ICPEA)\",\"volume\":\"1199 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference in Power Engineering Application (ICPEA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEA53519.2022.9744647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference in Power Engineering Application (ICPEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEA53519.2022.9744647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光伏系统是可再生能源家族的一部分。光伏系统的工作原理是将太阳辐射直接转化为电能,因此需要储能来积累系统产生的多余能量,以便在需要的时候使用。在马来西亚使用的最常见的能源存储类型是电池(BESS),这是一种短期存储解决方案,有许多缺点,如每年的存储成本高,以及在运行和回收阶段排放二氧化碳对环境造成的负面影响。这些缺点激发了对市场上提出的一种新的储能技术——重力储能系统(GESS)的研究。重力储能作为一种具有高功率容量和低环境影响的电池的完美替代品,在过去的几年里得到了广泛的讨论。本研究考虑了一个小于10兆瓦的小型电网发电系统,使用光伏系统和两种类型的储能系统,BESS和GESS。该研究还包括BESS和GESS系统在发电、存储容量、碳足迹和连接到已建成的光伏系统时的可用容量方面的比较。研究结果表明,GESS有潜力超过BESS,使其成为光伏系统更合适的储能选择。BES系统每个电池的二氧化碳排放量为3199- 13710 g二氧化碳当量,其运行成本远高于GESS系统,由于放电深度(DoD)和往返效率的原因,其可用容量小于GESS系统。尽管如此,BESS在安装成本方面具有优势,因为GESS的安装成本高达297万令吉,而BESS的安装成本为125万令吉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploration of the Suitability of Gravity Energy Storage in Malaysian Grid Systems
A photovoltaic system is a part of the renewable energy family. The Photovoltaic system's operating principle is based on converting sun radiation directly into electricity and therefore it needs energy storage to accumulate the excess energy generated by the system to use in times of need. The most common energy storage type used in Malaysia is batteries (BESS), a short-term storage solution with many drawbacks such as a high yearly storage cost and negative environmental impact resulting from emitting carbon dioxide during operation and recycling stages. These disadvantages have inspired studying the benefits of a new energy storage technique proposed in the market, gravity energy storage system (GESS). The gravity energy storage has been discussed in the past couple of years as the perfect alternative to batteries with advantages of high-power capacity and low environmental impact. This study considers a small grid size energy generation system of less than 10 MW using a PV system and two types of energy storage, the BESS and GESS. The study also includes a comparison between BESS and GESS systems in terms of their power generation, storage capacity, carbon footprint, and usable capacity when connected to a built PV system. The outcome of the study shows that GESS has the potential to outweigh BESS making it a more suitable energy storage option for the PV system. The BES system results in a carbon dioxide footprint of 3199- 13710 g CO2-eq per battery with an operating cost much higher than that of the GESS system and a usable capacity lesser than the GESS system due to the depth of discharge (DoD) and round-trip efficiency. Nonetheless, the BESS has the advantage in terms of installation cost, as the GESS installation can cost up to 2.97 million MYR, while BESS costs 1.25 million MYR for a similar system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation on Total Harmonics Distortion for Transistor Clamped Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter Using Newton-Raphson Method An Efficient Holomorphic Based Available Transfer Capability Solution in Presence of Large Scale Wind Farms Analysis of Radial Distribution Test Feeders in Presence of Solar Photovoltaic Systems Using PowerFactory Occurrence of Positive Cloud-to-Ground Lightning During Flash Flood in Malacca Investigation of Aerodynamics for Third Rail on Regenerative Braking Energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1