竞选捐款和游说腐败吗?来自公共财政的证据

Gajan Retnasaba
{"title":"竞选捐款和游说腐败吗?来自公共财政的证据","authors":"Gajan Retnasaba","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1003890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Private interests expend great amounts of resources attempting to influence government decisions using tools such as campaign contributions and lobbying. Yet, little is known about whether they use means fair or foul to achieve their goals. A better understanding of how private interests influence government, specifically whether they use corruption, is vital for informing debate on how such activities should be regulated. This paper presents two empirical attempts to measure the presence of corruption in state public finance. In the first it investigates whether campaign contributions caused corruption in the public finance industry of the early 1990s using an event study methodology. In the second it investigates the current controversy surrounding the use of lobbyists in public finance and whether their use is linked to corruption using a methodology that exploits state heterogeneity in the supply of corrupt decision makers. In both cases it finds strong evidence of corruption.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Campaign Contributions and Lobbying Corrupt? Evidence from Public Finance\",\"authors\":\"Gajan Retnasaba\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1003890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Private interests expend great amounts of resources attempting to influence government decisions using tools such as campaign contributions and lobbying. Yet, little is known about whether they use means fair or foul to achieve their goals. A better understanding of how private interests influence government, specifically whether they use corruption, is vital for informing debate on how such activities should be regulated. This paper presents two empirical attempts to measure the presence of corruption in state public finance. In the first it investigates whether campaign contributions caused corruption in the public finance industry of the early 1990s using an event study methodology. In the second it investigates the current controversy surrounding the use of lobbyists in public finance and whether their use is linked to corruption using a methodology that exploits state heterogeneity in the supply of corrupt decision makers. In both cases it finds strong evidence of corruption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1003890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1003890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

私人利益集团花费大量资源,试图利用竞选捐款和游说等工具影响政府决策。然而,他们是否使用了正当或不正当的手段来达到他们的目的却鲜为人知。更好地了解私人利益如何影响政府,特别是他们是否利用腐败,对于就如何监管此类活动进行辩论至关重要。本文提出了两个实证尝试来衡量国家公共财政中腐败的存在。在第一部分中,它使用事件研究方法调查了20世纪90年代初的竞选捐款是否导致了公共财政行业的腐败。在第二部分中,它调查了目前围绕在公共财政中使用游说者的争议,以及他们的使用是否与腐败有关,使用的方法是利用腐败决策者供应中的国家异质性。在这两个案例中,它都找到了腐败的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Campaign Contributions and Lobbying Corrupt? Evidence from Public Finance
Private interests expend great amounts of resources attempting to influence government decisions using tools such as campaign contributions and lobbying. Yet, little is known about whether they use means fair or foul to achieve their goals. A better understanding of how private interests influence government, specifically whether they use corruption, is vital for informing debate on how such activities should be regulated. This paper presents two empirical attempts to measure the presence of corruption in state public finance. In the first it investigates whether campaign contributions caused corruption in the public finance industry of the early 1990s using an event study methodology. In the second it investigates the current controversy surrounding the use of lobbyists in public finance and whether their use is linked to corruption using a methodology that exploits state heterogeneity in the supply of corrupt decision makers. In both cases it finds strong evidence of corruption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antitrust Error Costs Bostock was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, and Title VII 5G Deployment: The Role and Challenges of Regulatory Bodies in Ensuring Convergence Within the EU Data Point: 2019 Mortgage Market Activity and Trends The CIA's Democratic Integrity: Information Sharing and Electoral Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1