“什么是新自由主义?这意味着什么?:初级读本

N. Elhefnawy
{"title":"“什么是新自由主义?这意味着什么?:初级读本","authors":"N. Elhefnawy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3761219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"'What is Neoliberalism? And What Has it Meant?': A Primer\" endeavors to offer the reader a broad understanding of what has in recent years become the controversial idea, \"neoliberalism,\" on the basis of four claims it makes, explains and defends. These are, namely,<br><br>1. Neoliberalism is a distinct phenomenon, extending but also distinct from classical liberalism; and while broadly identifiable with certain prescriptions (deregulation, privatization, etc.) ultimately taking the form of the economic model here termed \"Neoliberal Financialization\" (distinguishable from the preceding Keynesian Fordism).<br><br>2. Neoliberalism, while developing over the course of the twentieth century, became an effective political force amid the crisis of the 1970s, primarily as a response to economic developments rather than the \"intellectual fashions\" emphasized by many of its chroniclers.<br><br>3. Neoliberalism's economic results have consistently fallen short of the promises made for them over past decades, whether the issue is industrial renewal, economic development, economic growth, the attainment of sounder government finances or anything else, but that policymakers and elites (who have done well out of the era) have remained committed to the model in spite of its disappointments.<br><br>4. Neoliberalism has never enjoyed broad public appeal, and been the object of popular backlashes during the decades in which it has prevailed, up to the present. Recent years have seen stronger challenges, identifiable with such events as \"Brexit\" and recent presidential elections in the U.S., but especially from the right the challenge has been limited, and overall the neoliberal model remains dominant.","PeriodicalId":283935,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'What is Neoliberalism? And What Has it Meant?': A Primer\",\"authors\":\"N. Elhefnawy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3761219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"'What is Neoliberalism? And What Has it Meant?': A Primer\\\" endeavors to offer the reader a broad understanding of what has in recent years become the controversial idea, \\\"neoliberalism,\\\" on the basis of four claims it makes, explains and defends. These are, namely,<br><br>1. Neoliberalism is a distinct phenomenon, extending but also distinct from classical liberalism; and while broadly identifiable with certain prescriptions (deregulation, privatization, etc.) ultimately taking the form of the economic model here termed \\\"Neoliberal Financialization\\\" (distinguishable from the preceding Keynesian Fordism).<br><br>2. Neoliberalism, while developing over the course of the twentieth century, became an effective political force amid the crisis of the 1970s, primarily as a response to economic developments rather than the \\\"intellectual fashions\\\" emphasized by many of its chroniclers.<br><br>3. Neoliberalism's economic results have consistently fallen short of the promises made for them over past decades, whether the issue is industrial renewal, economic development, economic growth, the attainment of sounder government finances or anything else, but that policymakers and elites (who have done well out of the era) have remained committed to the model in spite of its disappointments.<br><br>4. Neoliberalism has never enjoyed broad public appeal, and been the object of popular backlashes during the decades in which it has prevailed, up to the present. Recent years have seen stronger challenges, identifiable with such events as \\\"Brexit\\\" and recent presidential elections in the U.S., but especially from the right the challenge has been limited, and overall the neoliberal model remains dominant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3761219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3761219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“‘什么是新自由主义?这意味着什么?《入门》试图让读者对近年来备受争议的“新自由主义”概念有一个广泛的理解,基于它所提出、解释和捍卫的四个主张。也就是1。新自由主义是一种独特的现象,它延伸于古典自由主义,但又有别于古典自由主义;虽然可以广泛地识别出某些处方(放松管制,私有化等),但最终采取了这里称为“新自由主义金融化”的经济模式的形式(与之前的凯恩斯主义福特主义不同)。新自由主义在20世纪的发展过程中,在20世纪70年代的危机中成为一股有效的政治力量,主要是作为对经济发展的回应,而不是许多编年史家所强调的“知识潮流”。在过去的几十年里,新自由主义的经济结果一直没有达到对他们的承诺,无论是工业复兴,经济发展,经济增长,实现更健全的政府财政还是其他任何问题,但政策制定者和精英(他们在这个时代做得很好)仍然致力于这种模式,尽管它令人失望。新自由主义从来没有获得过广泛的公众吸引力,在它盛行至今的几十年里,它一直是公众强烈反对的对象。近年来出现了更大的挑战,如“英国脱欧”和最近的美国总统选举,但特别是来自右翼的挑战有限,总体而言,新自由主义模式仍占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'What is Neoliberalism? And What Has it Meant?': A Primer
"'What is Neoliberalism? And What Has it Meant?': A Primer" endeavors to offer the reader a broad understanding of what has in recent years become the controversial idea, "neoliberalism," on the basis of four claims it makes, explains and defends. These are, namely,

1. Neoliberalism is a distinct phenomenon, extending but also distinct from classical liberalism; and while broadly identifiable with certain prescriptions (deregulation, privatization, etc.) ultimately taking the form of the economic model here termed "Neoliberal Financialization" (distinguishable from the preceding Keynesian Fordism).

2. Neoliberalism, while developing over the course of the twentieth century, became an effective political force amid the crisis of the 1970s, primarily as a response to economic developments rather than the "intellectual fashions" emphasized by many of its chroniclers.

3. Neoliberalism's economic results have consistently fallen short of the promises made for them over past decades, whether the issue is industrial renewal, economic development, economic growth, the attainment of sounder government finances or anything else, but that policymakers and elites (who have done well out of the era) have remained committed to the model in spite of its disappointments.

4. Neoliberalism has never enjoyed broad public appeal, and been the object of popular backlashes during the decades in which it has prevailed, up to the present. Recent years have seen stronger challenges, identifiable with such events as "Brexit" and recent presidential elections in the U.S., but especially from the right the challenge has been limited, and overall the neoliberal model remains dominant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'What is Neoliberalism? And What Has it Meant?': A Primer Reading the Hermeneutics of Suspicion with Suspicion: A Review Essay on Nancy MacLean's Democracy in Chains James Buchanan and the Properly Trained Economist On the Advantages of a System of Labour-Managed Firms Procedural Democracy and Social Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1