风险溢价有助于揭示未被发现的利率平价失败吗?

Satish Kumar
{"title":"风险溢价有助于揭示未被发现的利率平价失败吗?","authors":"Satish Kumar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3754177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is a general consensus emerging that the uncovered interest parity (UIP) does not hold or ex-post exchange rate change predicts the interest rate differential in the wrong direction. This paper provides a pioneer study to offer a risk premium based solution to the popular UIP failure using a dataset of 44 advanced and emerging currencies. We report that in the absence of risk premium, UIP failure is more prominent in emerging countries relative to advanced countries since only 34% of the total beta coefficients range between 0.5 and 1.5. Next, we include the risk premium in the main UIP equation using a component generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic-in-mean (CGARCH-M) model and show that the results conform more to the UIP theory since 73% of the beta coefficients range between 0.5 and 1.5. Such a finding validates our argument that risk premium is the main factor responsible for UIP violation and including it in the main equation helps uncover the UIP puzzle, especially in the case of emerging countries. Overall, in the presence of risk premium, in most countries, ex-post exchange rate change bear a positive relationship with the interest rate differential as UIP predicts. This is our key contribution to the literature.","PeriodicalId":209192,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Risk Premium Help Uncover the Uncovered Interest Parity Failure?\",\"authors\":\"Satish Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3754177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There is a general consensus emerging that the uncovered interest parity (UIP) does not hold or ex-post exchange rate change predicts the interest rate differential in the wrong direction. This paper provides a pioneer study to offer a risk premium based solution to the popular UIP failure using a dataset of 44 advanced and emerging currencies. We report that in the absence of risk premium, UIP failure is more prominent in emerging countries relative to advanced countries since only 34% of the total beta coefficients range between 0.5 and 1.5. Next, we include the risk premium in the main UIP equation using a component generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic-in-mean (CGARCH-M) model and show that the results conform more to the UIP theory since 73% of the beta coefficients range between 0.5 and 1.5. Such a finding validates our argument that risk premium is the main factor responsible for UIP violation and including it in the main equation helps uncover the UIP puzzle, especially in the case of emerging countries. Overall, in the presence of risk premium, in most countries, ex-post exchange rate change bear a positive relationship with the interest rate differential as UIP predicts. This is our key contribution to the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3754177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3754177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一个普遍的共识是,未发现的利率平价(UIP)并不成立,或者事后汇率变化预测的利率差异方向是错误的。本文提供了一项开创性的研究,使用44种先进和新兴货币的数据集,为流行的UIP失败提供基于风险溢价的解决方案。我们报告说,在没有风险溢价的情况下,相对于发达国家,新兴国家的UIP失败更为突出,因为只有34%的总贝塔系数在0.5和1.5之间。接下来,我们使用一个成分广义自回归条件异方差均值(CGARCH-M)模型将风险溢价纳入主UIP方程,并表明结果更符合UIP理论,因为73%的贝塔系数范围在0.5到1.5之间。这一发现验证了我们的观点,即风险溢价是导致UIP违规的主要因素,将其纳入主要方程有助于揭示UIP之谜,特别是在新兴国家的情况下。总体而言,在存在风险溢价的情况下,大多数国家的事后汇率变动与利率差呈正相关关系,正如upip所预测的那样。这是我们对文献的主要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Risk Premium Help Uncover the Uncovered Interest Parity Failure?
Abstract There is a general consensus emerging that the uncovered interest parity (UIP) does not hold or ex-post exchange rate change predicts the interest rate differential in the wrong direction. This paper provides a pioneer study to offer a risk premium based solution to the popular UIP failure using a dataset of 44 advanced and emerging currencies. We report that in the absence of risk premium, UIP failure is more prominent in emerging countries relative to advanced countries since only 34% of the total beta coefficients range between 0.5 and 1.5. Next, we include the risk premium in the main UIP equation using a component generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic-in-mean (CGARCH-M) model and show that the results conform more to the UIP theory since 73% of the beta coefficients range between 0.5 and 1.5. Such a finding validates our argument that risk premium is the main factor responsible for UIP violation and including it in the main equation helps uncover the UIP puzzle, especially in the case of emerging countries. Overall, in the presence of risk premium, in most countries, ex-post exchange rate change bear a positive relationship with the interest rate differential as UIP predicts. This is our key contribution to the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long Run Risks in FX Markets: Are They There? Asset Pricing with Panel Trees Under Global Split Criteria Efficient LOESS For Financial Applications Infinite but Rare: Valuation and Pricing in Marketplaces for Blockchain-Based Nonfungible Tokens On Robust Inference for Consumption-based Asset Pricing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1