对欧洲具有系统重要性的银行提出的缓冲要求是否会降低它们的系统性?

Carmen Broto, Luis Gonzalo Fernandez Lafuerza, Mariya Melnychuk
{"title":"对欧洲具有系统重要性的银行提出的缓冲要求是否会降低它们的系统性?","authors":"Carmen Broto, Luis Gonzalo Fernandez Lafuerza, Mariya Melnychuk","doi":"10.53479/24876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Buffers for systemically important institutions (SIIs) were designed to mitigate the risks posed by these large and complex banks. With a panel data model for a sample of listed European banks, we demonstrate that capital requirements for SIIs effectively reduce the perceived systemic risk of these institutions, which we proxy with the SRISK indicator in Brownlees and Engle (2017). We also study the impact of the adjustment mechanisms that banks use to comply with SII buffer requirements and their contribution to systemic risk. The results show that banks mainly respond to higher SII buffers by increasing their equity, as intended by the regulators. Once we control for the options SIIs employ to fulfil these requirements and SII characteristics (e.g. total asset size), we find a residual effect of having SII status. This result suggests that being an SII provides a positive signal to markets by further decreasing its contribution to systemic risk.","PeriodicalId":296461,"journal":{"name":"Documentos de Trabajo","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do buffer requirements for European systemically important banks make them less systemic?\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Broto, Luis Gonzalo Fernandez Lafuerza, Mariya Melnychuk\",\"doi\":\"10.53479/24876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Buffers for systemically important institutions (SIIs) were designed to mitigate the risks posed by these large and complex banks. With a panel data model for a sample of listed European banks, we demonstrate that capital requirements for SIIs effectively reduce the perceived systemic risk of these institutions, which we proxy with the SRISK indicator in Brownlees and Engle (2017). We also study the impact of the adjustment mechanisms that banks use to comply with SII buffer requirements and their contribution to systemic risk. The results show that banks mainly respond to higher SII buffers by increasing their equity, as intended by the regulators. Once we control for the options SIIs employ to fulfil these requirements and SII characteristics (e.g. total asset size), we find a residual effect of having SII status. This result suggests that being an SII provides a positive signal to markets by further decreasing its contribution to systemic risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Documentos de Trabajo\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Documentos de Trabajo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53479/24876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documentos de Trabajo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53479/24876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

系统重要性机构(sii)的缓冲旨在减轻这些大型复杂银行带来的风险。通过对欧洲上市银行样本的面板数据模型,我们证明了sii的资本要求有效地降低了这些机构的感知系统风险,我们用Brownlees和Engle(2017)中的SRISK指标来代理。我们还研究了银行用于遵守SII缓冲要求的调整机制的影响及其对系统性风险的贡献。结果表明,银行主要通过增加股本来应对更高的SII缓冲,正如监管机构所希望的那样。一旦我们控制了SII用来满足这些需求和SII特征(例如总资产规模)的选项,我们就会发现具有SII状态的剩余效应。这一结果表明,通过进一步减少其对系统风险的贡献,成为SII向市场提供了一个积极的信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do buffer requirements for European systemically important banks make them less systemic?
Buffers for systemically important institutions (SIIs) were designed to mitigate the risks posed by these large and complex banks. With a panel data model for a sample of listed European banks, we demonstrate that capital requirements for SIIs effectively reduce the perceived systemic risk of these institutions, which we proxy with the SRISK indicator in Brownlees and Engle (2017). We also study the impact of the adjustment mechanisms that banks use to comply with SII buffer requirements and their contribution to systemic risk. The results show that banks mainly respond to higher SII buffers by increasing their equity, as intended by the regulators. Once we control for the options SIIs employ to fulfil these requirements and SII characteristics (e.g. total asset size), we find a residual effect of having SII status. This result suggests that being an SII provides a positive signal to markets by further decreasing its contribution to systemic risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Green energy transition and vulnerability to external shocks Access to credit and firm survival during a crisis: the case of zero-bank-debt firms Shadow seniority? Lending relationships and borrowers’ selective default Stabilisation properties of a sure-like European unemployment insurance The effects of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policies from 2011 to 2018 on banking assets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1