“假新闻”言论

Ehsan Dehghan, S. Glazunova
{"title":"“假新闻”言论","authors":"Ehsan Dehghan, S. Glazunova","doi":"10.1075/JLP.21032.DEH","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article explores the strategic use of ‘fake news’ discourses in non-democratic contexts using a mixed-methods\n approach grounded in social network analysis and discourse theory. In contexts such as Russia and Iran, where the opposition\n generally does not have unrestricted access to the political public sphere, social media platforms serve to influence discourses.\n Given the prevalence of fake news discourses, previous studies have already focused extensively on the political elite and their\n use of this discourse within Western or Anglo-American contexts, and on the typologies of ‘fake news’. Our findings address this\n research gap and suggest that ordinary users in non-Western and non-democratic settings do not differentiate between ‘fake news’\n types. Rather, they employ the discourse as a means to strategically delegitimise and discredit their opponents.","PeriodicalId":167182,"journal":{"name":"Discourses of Fake News","volume":"44 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Fake news’ discourses\",\"authors\":\"Ehsan Dehghan, S. Glazunova\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JLP.21032.DEH\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article explores the strategic use of ‘fake news’ discourses in non-democratic contexts using a mixed-methods\\n approach grounded in social network analysis and discourse theory. In contexts such as Russia and Iran, where the opposition\\n generally does not have unrestricted access to the political public sphere, social media platforms serve to influence discourses.\\n Given the prevalence of fake news discourses, previous studies have already focused extensively on the political elite and their\\n use of this discourse within Western or Anglo-American contexts, and on the typologies of ‘fake news’. Our findings address this\\n research gap and suggest that ordinary users in non-Western and non-democratic settings do not differentiate between ‘fake news’\\n types. Rather, they employ the discourse as a means to strategically delegitimise and discredit their opponents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourses of Fake News\",\"volume\":\"44 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourses of Fake News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLP.21032.DEH\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourses of Fake News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLP.21032.DEH","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文采用基于社会网络分析和话语理论的混合方法,探讨了在非民主背景下“假新闻”话语的战略使用。在俄罗斯和伊朗等国家,反对派通常无法不受限制地进入政治公共领域,社交媒体平台可以影响言论。鉴于假新闻话语的盛行,之前的研究已经广泛关注政治精英及其在西方或英美语境下对这种话语的使用,以及“假新闻”的类型学。我们的研究结果解决了这一研究缺口,并表明非西方和非民主环境下的普通用户无法区分“假新闻”类型。相反,他们利用这种话语作为一种手段,在战略上使对手失去合法性和信誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Fake news’ discourses
This article explores the strategic use of ‘fake news’ discourses in non-democratic contexts using a mixed-methods approach grounded in social network analysis and discourse theory. In contexts such as Russia and Iran, where the opposition generally does not have unrestricted access to the political public sphere, social media platforms serve to influence discourses. Given the prevalence of fake news discourses, previous studies have already focused extensively on the political elite and their use of this discourse within Western or Anglo-American contexts, and on the typologies of ‘fake news’. Our findings address this research gap and suggest that ordinary users in non-Western and non-democratic settings do not differentiate between ‘fake news’ types. Rather, they employ the discourse as a means to strategically delegitimise and discredit their opponents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poisoning the information well? Beyond ‘fake news’? ‘Fake news’ discourses Recursion theory and the ‘death tax’ Audience constructions of fake news in Australian media representations of asylum seekers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1