宫颈旁阻滞作为减少腹腔镜子宫切除术患者术后疼痛的围手术期策略的系统评价和荟萃分析

Rifaldy Nabiel, Daniel Alexander Suseno, Yonas Hadisubroto, Taufiq Gemawan, Aurellia Nuraini Anindito Putri, Syadza Salsabila, Eprila Darma Sari
{"title":"宫颈旁阻滞作为减少腹腔镜子宫切除术患者术后疼痛的围手术期策略的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Rifaldy Nabiel, Daniel Alexander Suseno, Yonas Hadisubroto, Taufiq Gemawan, Aurellia Nuraini Anindito Putri, Syadza Salsabila, Eprila Darma Sari","doi":"10.20473/ijar.v5i22023.112-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Perioperative strategies to reduce postoperative pain are important for enhancing patient satisfaction. However, further research and trials has sparked ongoing debates of various strategies regarding efficacy and safety. Objective: This study aims to improve evidence-based strategies regarding the effect of paracervical anaesthetic blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Materials and Method: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect for RCTs in laparoscopic hysterectomy patients administered paracervical blocks and those given placebos. The quantitative analysis of pooled relative risk and mean difference with a 95% confidence interval were performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software in the random-effects model or fixed-effects model forest plot. Results: Based on four RCTs included in the analysis, there were significant differences in overall postoperative pain scores assessed by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) [MD = -0.82, 95%CI (-1.47 to -1.06), p = 0.01]. The subgroup analysis also showed significant differences in VAS pain scores at 30 min and 1 hour post-operation [MD = -2.13, 95% CI (-3.09 to -1.16), p = 0.0001] and [MD = -2.55, 95% CI (-4.29 to -0.81), p = 0.004]. However, there were insignificant results in adequate pain control [RR = 7.90, 95%CI (0.39 to 158.67), p = 0.18], length of hospital stay [MD = 0.01, 95%CI (-0.52 to 0.54), p = 0.96], additional analgesics requirement at 24 hours [RR = 0.88, 95%CI (0.55 to 1.39), p=0.58], and perioperative complications [RR = 0.90, 95%CI (0.56 to 1.47), p = 0.68].Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that the administration of paracervical block in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a reduction of postoperative VAS pain score but not associated with the length of hospital stay, adequate pain control, additional analgesics requirement at 24 hours, and perioperative complications.","PeriodicalId":117902,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Paracervical Blocks as A Perioperative Strategy in Reducing Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy\",\"authors\":\"Rifaldy Nabiel, Daniel Alexander Suseno, Yonas Hadisubroto, Taufiq Gemawan, Aurellia Nuraini Anindito Putri, Syadza Salsabila, Eprila Darma Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/ijar.v5i22023.112-121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Perioperative strategies to reduce postoperative pain are important for enhancing patient satisfaction. However, further research and trials has sparked ongoing debates of various strategies regarding efficacy and safety. Objective: This study aims to improve evidence-based strategies regarding the effect of paracervical anaesthetic blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Materials and Method: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect for RCTs in laparoscopic hysterectomy patients administered paracervical blocks and those given placebos. The quantitative analysis of pooled relative risk and mean difference with a 95% confidence interval were performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software in the random-effects model or fixed-effects model forest plot. Results: Based on four RCTs included in the analysis, there were significant differences in overall postoperative pain scores assessed by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) [MD = -0.82, 95%CI (-1.47 to -1.06), p = 0.01]. The subgroup analysis also showed significant differences in VAS pain scores at 30 min and 1 hour post-operation [MD = -2.13, 95% CI (-3.09 to -1.16), p = 0.0001] and [MD = -2.55, 95% CI (-4.29 to -0.81), p = 0.004]. However, there were insignificant results in adequate pain control [RR = 7.90, 95%CI (0.39 to 158.67), p = 0.18], length of hospital stay [MD = 0.01, 95%CI (-0.52 to 0.54), p = 0.96], additional analgesics requirement at 24 hours [RR = 0.88, 95%CI (0.55 to 1.39), p=0.58], and perioperative complications [RR = 0.90, 95%CI (0.56 to 1.47), p = 0.68].Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that the administration of paracervical block in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a reduction of postoperative VAS pain score but not associated with the length of hospital stay, adequate pain control, additional analgesics requirement at 24 hours, and perioperative complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijar.v5i22023.112-121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijar.v5i22023.112-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:围手术期策略减少术后疼痛是提高患者满意度的重要手段。然而,进一步的研究和试验引发了关于疗效和安全性的各种策略的持续争论。目的:本研究旨在完善腹腔镜子宫切除术患者宫颈旁麻醉阻滞效果的循证策略。材料和方法:通过PubMed、Google Scholar和ScienceDirect对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者给予宫颈旁阻滞和给予安慰剂的随机对照试验进行系统的文献检索。在随机效应模型或固定效应模型森林图中,采用Review Manager 5.4软件对合并相对风险和平均差异进行定量分析,并以95%置信区间进行分析。结果:纳入分析的4项随机对照试验中,两组患者术后疼痛总分VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)评分差异有统计学意义[MD = -0.82, 95%CI (-1.47 ~ -1.06), p = 0.01]。亚组分析还显示,术后30 min和1 h VAS疼痛评分差异有统计学意义[MD = -2.13, 95% CI (-3.09 ~ -1.16), p = 0.0001]和[MD = -2.55, 95% CI (-4.29 ~ -0.81), p = 0.004]。然而,在足够的疼痛控制[RR = 7.90, 95%CI (0.39 ~ 158.67), p= 0.18]、住院时间[MD = 0.01, 95%CI (-0.52 ~ 0.54), p= 0.96]、24小时额外止痛药需求[RR = 0.88, 95%CI (0.55 ~ 1.39), p=0.58]和围手术期并发症[RR = 0.90, 95%CI (0.56 ~ 1.47), p= 0.68]方面的结果不显著。结论:本荟萃分析提供的证据表明,在腹腔镜子宫切除术患者中应用宫颈旁阻滞与术后VAS疼痛评分的降低有关,但与住院时间、足够的疼痛控制、24小时额外镇痛药物需求和围手术期并发症无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Paracervical Blocks as A Perioperative Strategy in Reducing Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Introduction: Perioperative strategies to reduce postoperative pain are important for enhancing patient satisfaction. However, further research and trials has sparked ongoing debates of various strategies regarding efficacy and safety. Objective: This study aims to improve evidence-based strategies regarding the effect of paracervical anaesthetic blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Materials and Method: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect for RCTs in laparoscopic hysterectomy patients administered paracervical blocks and those given placebos. The quantitative analysis of pooled relative risk and mean difference with a 95% confidence interval were performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software in the random-effects model or fixed-effects model forest plot. Results: Based on four RCTs included in the analysis, there were significant differences in overall postoperative pain scores assessed by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) [MD = -0.82, 95%CI (-1.47 to -1.06), p = 0.01]. The subgroup analysis also showed significant differences in VAS pain scores at 30 min and 1 hour post-operation [MD = -2.13, 95% CI (-3.09 to -1.16), p = 0.0001] and [MD = -2.55, 95% CI (-4.29 to -0.81), p = 0.004]. However, there were insignificant results in adequate pain control [RR = 7.90, 95%CI (0.39 to 158.67), p = 0.18], length of hospital stay [MD = 0.01, 95%CI (-0.52 to 0.54), p = 0.96], additional analgesics requirement at 24 hours [RR = 0.88, 95%CI (0.55 to 1.39), p=0.58], and perioperative complications [RR = 0.90, 95%CI (0.56 to 1.47), p = 0.68].Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that the administration of paracervical block in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a reduction of postoperative VAS pain score but not associated with the length of hospital stay, adequate pain control, additional analgesics requirement at 24 hours, and perioperative complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulsed Radiofrequency on Sphenopalatine Ganglion as the Interventional Pain Management in Cluster Headache Secondary to Sphenoid Meningioma Developing an Effective Team-Based Emergency Training Program for Medical Students AIMS65 Scoring System for Predicting Clinical Outcomes Among Emergency Department Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia with Isobaric Ropivacaine 0.375% for Inguinal Hernia Surgery in a Heart Failure Patient with Ejection Fraction of 36% Comparison of Intravenous Administration of Remifentanil with Fentanyl for Increased Blood Sugar Levels in Post Cardiac Surgery Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1