累犯法规对外国定罪作为减刑谓词的处理

Alex Glashausser
{"title":"累犯法规对外国定罪作为减刑谓词的处理","authors":"Alex Glashausser","doi":"10.2307/1372868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All jurisdictions within the United States have some form of repeat offender statute that enhances sentences based on prior convictions. Many criminals in the United States have committed crimes in other countries. It is no surprise, then, that a recurring question is whether convictions from foreign countries count as predicate offenses for the purpose of recidivist statutes. Some state legislatures have addressed that question directly, but many more have enacted ambiguous statutes that use phrases such as outside this state. Some courts have interpreted those phrases as embracing convictions from outside the United States, while others have limited their scope to the United States. This note discusses doctrinal and policy considerations and proposes a standard courts should use in deciding when to include foreign country convictions.","PeriodicalId":297504,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Treatment of Foreign Country Convictions as Predicates for Sentence Enhancement Under Recidivist Statutes\",\"authors\":\"Alex Glashausser\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1372868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"All jurisdictions within the United States have some form of repeat offender statute that enhances sentences based on prior convictions. Many criminals in the United States have committed crimes in other countries. It is no surprise, then, that a recurring question is whether convictions from foreign countries count as predicate offenses for the purpose of recidivist statutes. Some state legislatures have addressed that question directly, but many more have enacted ambiguous statutes that use phrases such as outside this state. Some courts have interpreted those phrases as embracing convictions from outside the United States, while others have limited their scope to the United States. This note discusses doctrinal and policy considerations and proposes a standard courts should use in deciding when to include foreign country convictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1372868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1372868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

美国的所有司法管辖区都有某种形式的累犯法规,根据先前的定罪来加重刑罚。美国的许多罪犯在其他国家也犯过罪。因此,毫不奇怪,一个反复出现的问题是,根据累犯法规的目的,来自外国的定罪是否算作上游犯罪。一些州的立法机构已经直接解决了这个问题,但更多的州制定了模棱两可的法规,使用了诸如“州外”之类的短语。一些法院将这些措辞解释为包括来自美国以外的定罪,而另一些法院则将其范围限制在美国。本说明讨论了理论和政策方面的考虑,并提出了法院在决定何时包括外国定罪时应使用的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Treatment of Foreign Country Convictions as Predicates for Sentence Enhancement Under Recidivist Statutes
All jurisdictions within the United States have some form of repeat offender statute that enhances sentences based on prior convictions. Many criminals in the United States have committed crimes in other countries. It is no surprise, then, that a recurring question is whether convictions from foreign countries count as predicate offenses for the purpose of recidivist statutes. Some state legislatures have addressed that question directly, but many more have enacted ambiguous statutes that use phrases such as outside this state. Some courts have interpreted those phrases as embracing convictions from outside the United States, while others have limited their scope to the United States. This note discusses doctrinal and policy considerations and proposes a standard courts should use in deciding when to include foreign country convictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chevron as a Voting Rule Health Insurance Exchanges in Health Care Reform Legal and Policy Issues Equitable Balancing in the Age of Statutes Creating a Template for Banking Insolvency Law Reform after the Collapse of Northern Rock Unjust Laws and Illegal Norms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1