法官立法:加州的司法能动主义及其对成人监狱改革日益增长的影响

Chantale Fiebig
{"title":"法官立法:加州的司法能动主义及其对成人监狱改革日益增长的影响","authors":"Chantale Fiebig","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.977245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"California's prison system is operating at 194% capacity and is in drastic need of reform. With the failure of the executive and legislative branches to ameliorate the growing problems, California's judges have taken action and mandated sweeping reforms through their judicial decisions. This paper seeks to explore why California's judges continue to take on this role of activism. First, the major cases that have impacted the adult prison system from 1995-2005 are reviewed. Next, the paper explores national trends to determine whether or not California is an anomaly. Based on a review of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996's impact on prisoner litigation and the judicial trends in New York, Florida, and Texas, the conclusion is that California is, in fact, an anomaly. Accordingly, the paper identifies three factors as the most significant drivers of California's judicial activism: the existence of the Prison Law Office; the personal influence of Judge Thelton E. Henderson; and California's unique political climate. Finally, this paper concludes by identifying the policy implications of a judiciary-dependent path towards prison reform.","PeriodicalId":348264,"journal":{"name":"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislating from the Bench: Judicial Activism in California and its Increasing Impact on Adult Prison Reform\",\"authors\":\"Chantale Fiebig\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.977245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"California's prison system is operating at 194% capacity and is in drastic need of reform. With the failure of the executive and legislative branches to ameliorate the growing problems, California's judges have taken action and mandated sweeping reforms through their judicial decisions. This paper seeks to explore why California's judges continue to take on this role of activism. First, the major cases that have impacted the adult prison system from 1995-2005 are reviewed. Next, the paper explores national trends to determine whether or not California is an anomaly. Based on a review of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996's impact on prisoner litigation and the judicial trends in New York, Florida, and Texas, the conclusion is that California is, in fact, an anomaly. Accordingly, the paper identifies three factors as the most significant drivers of California's judicial activism: the existence of the Prison Law Office; the personal influence of Judge Thelton E. Henderson; and California's unique political climate. Finally, this paper concludes by identifying the policy implications of a judiciary-dependent path towards prison reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.977245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.977245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

加州监狱系统的利用率达到了194%,急需改革。由于行政和立法部门未能改善日益严重的问题,加州的法官已经采取行动,并通过他们的司法裁决强制进行全面改革。本文试图探讨为什么加州的法官继续承担这种行动主义的角色。首先,回顾了1995-2005年间影响成人监狱系统的重大案件。接下来,本文探讨了全国趋势,以确定加州是否是一个特例。通过对1996年《监狱诉讼改革法案》对囚犯诉讼的影响以及纽约州、佛罗里达州和德克萨斯州的司法趋势的回顾,我们得出的结论是,加州实际上是一个特例。因此,本文确定了三个因素是加州司法能动主义最重要的驱动因素:监狱法律办公室的存在;Thelton E. Henderson法官的个人影响;以及加州独特的政治气候。最后,本文通过确定依赖司法的监狱改革道路的政策含义来结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legislating from the Bench: Judicial Activism in California and its Increasing Impact on Adult Prison Reform
California's prison system is operating at 194% capacity and is in drastic need of reform. With the failure of the executive and legislative branches to ameliorate the growing problems, California's judges have taken action and mandated sweeping reforms through their judicial decisions. This paper seeks to explore why California's judges continue to take on this role of activism. First, the major cases that have impacted the adult prison system from 1995-2005 are reviewed. Next, the paper explores national trends to determine whether or not California is an anomaly. Based on a review of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996's impact on prisoner litigation and the judicial trends in New York, Florida, and Texas, the conclusion is that California is, in fact, an anomaly. Accordingly, the paper identifies three factors as the most significant drivers of California's judicial activism: the existence of the Prison Law Office; the personal influence of Judge Thelton E. Henderson; and California's unique political climate. Finally, this paper concludes by identifying the policy implications of a judiciary-dependent path towards prison reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fakers and Floodgates A New Approach to Local Rules Title VII as Precedent: Past and Prologue for Future Legislation Missing the Forest for the Trees: Federal Habeas Corpus and the Piecemeal Problem in Actual Innocence Cases Legislating from the Bench: Judicial Activism in California and its Increasing Impact on Adult Prison Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1