{"title":"法官立法:加州的司法能动主义及其对成人监狱改革日益增长的影响","authors":"Chantale Fiebig","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.977245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"California's prison system is operating at 194% capacity and is in drastic need of reform. With the failure of the executive and legislative branches to ameliorate the growing problems, California's judges have taken action and mandated sweeping reforms through their judicial decisions. This paper seeks to explore why California's judges continue to take on this role of activism. First, the major cases that have impacted the adult prison system from 1995-2005 are reviewed. Next, the paper explores national trends to determine whether or not California is an anomaly. Based on a review of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996's impact on prisoner litigation and the judicial trends in New York, Florida, and Texas, the conclusion is that California is, in fact, an anomaly. Accordingly, the paper identifies three factors as the most significant drivers of California's judicial activism: the existence of the Prison Law Office; the personal influence of Judge Thelton E. Henderson; and California's unique political climate. Finally, this paper concludes by identifying the policy implications of a judiciary-dependent path towards prison reform.","PeriodicalId":348264,"journal":{"name":"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislating from the Bench: Judicial Activism in California and its Increasing Impact on Adult Prison Reform\",\"authors\":\"Chantale Fiebig\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.977245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"California's prison system is operating at 194% capacity and is in drastic need of reform. With the failure of the executive and legislative branches to ameliorate the growing problems, California's judges have taken action and mandated sweeping reforms through their judicial decisions. This paper seeks to explore why California's judges continue to take on this role of activism. First, the major cases that have impacted the adult prison system from 1995-2005 are reviewed. Next, the paper explores national trends to determine whether or not California is an anomaly. Based on a review of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996's impact on prisoner litigation and the judicial trends in New York, Florida, and Texas, the conclusion is that California is, in fact, an anomaly. Accordingly, the paper identifies three factors as the most significant drivers of California's judicial activism: the existence of the Prison Law Office; the personal influence of Judge Thelton E. Henderson; and California's unique political climate. Finally, this paper concludes by identifying the policy implications of a judiciary-dependent path towards prison reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.977245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.977245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
加州监狱系统的利用率达到了194%,急需改革。由于行政和立法部门未能改善日益严重的问题,加州的法官已经采取行动,并通过他们的司法裁决强制进行全面改革。本文试图探讨为什么加州的法官继续承担这种行动主义的角色。首先,回顾了1995-2005年间影响成人监狱系统的重大案件。接下来,本文探讨了全国趋势,以确定加州是否是一个特例。通过对1996年《监狱诉讼改革法案》对囚犯诉讼的影响以及纽约州、佛罗里达州和德克萨斯州的司法趋势的回顾,我们得出的结论是,加州实际上是一个特例。因此,本文确定了三个因素是加州司法能动主义最重要的驱动因素:监狱法律办公室的存在;Thelton E. Henderson法官的个人影响;以及加州独特的政治气候。最后,本文通过确定依赖司法的监狱改革道路的政策含义来结束。
Legislating from the Bench: Judicial Activism in California and its Increasing Impact on Adult Prison Reform
California's prison system is operating at 194% capacity and is in drastic need of reform. With the failure of the executive and legislative branches to ameliorate the growing problems, California's judges have taken action and mandated sweeping reforms through their judicial decisions. This paper seeks to explore why California's judges continue to take on this role of activism. First, the major cases that have impacted the adult prison system from 1995-2005 are reviewed. Next, the paper explores national trends to determine whether or not California is an anomaly. Based on a review of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996's impact on prisoner litigation and the judicial trends in New York, Florida, and Texas, the conclusion is that California is, in fact, an anomaly. Accordingly, the paper identifies three factors as the most significant drivers of California's judicial activism: the existence of the Prison Law Office; the personal influence of Judge Thelton E. Henderson; and California's unique political climate. Finally, this paper concludes by identifying the policy implications of a judiciary-dependent path towards prison reform.