论民事诉讼中中止诉讼陈述书判决的上诉

E. F. Evseev
{"title":"论民事诉讼中中止诉讼陈述书判决的上诉","authors":"E. F. Evseev","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-33-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to a critical analysis of the amendment, which excluded the right to file a private complaint against a court ruling to leave the statement of claim without progress in civil proceedings. The inconsistency of possible arguments in favor of this amendment is revealed. The substitute procedure for challenging this definition by appealing against the decision on the return of the statement of claim is analyzed, and its inadequacy to the problem being solved is revealed. Based on this, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to return to the previous appellate procedure for appealing directly to the ruling on leaving the statement of claim without movement.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Appeal of the Ruling for Suspension of a Statement of Claim in a Civil Procedure\",\"authors\":\"E. F. Evseev\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-33-37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to a critical analysis of the amendment, which excluded the right to file a private complaint against a court ruling to leave the statement of claim without progress in civil proceedings. The inconsistency of possible arguments in favor of this amendment is revealed. The substitute procedure for challenging this definition by appealing against the decision on the return of the statement of claim is analyzed, and its inadequacy to the problem being solved is revealed. Based on this, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to return to the previous appellate procedure for appealing directly to the ruling on leaving the statement of claim without movement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-33-37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-33-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章专门对该修正案进行批判性分析,该修正案排除了对法院在民事诉讼中没有取得进展而放弃索赔声明的裁决提起私人诉讼的权利。支持这一修正案的可能论据的不一致性被揭示出来。分析了通过对退回索赔书的决定提出上诉来挑战这一定义的替代程序,并揭示了其对所要解决的问题的不足之处。在此基础上,发件人得出结论认为,有必要回到以前的上诉程序,直接对关于不提交索赔声明的裁决提出上诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Appeal of the Ruling for Suspension of a Statement of Claim in a Civil Procedure
The article is devoted to a critical analysis of the amendment, which excluded the right to file a private complaint against a court ruling to leave the statement of claim without progress in civil proceedings. The inconsistency of possible arguments in favor of this amendment is revealed. The substitute procedure for challenging this definition by appealing against the decision on the return of the statement of claim is analyzed, and its inadequacy to the problem being solved is revealed. Based on this, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to return to the previous appellate procedure for appealing directly to the ruling on leaving the statement of claim without movement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abuse of Law in the Area of Insolvency (Bankruptcy) On the Need for the Unification of Provisions of the Institution of Parties to a Case in Procedural Branches of Russian Law Aims of the Civil Procedure in Russia and France: Common Features and Differences Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure Collective litigation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1