基于汽车模拟站测试的ACC系统场景下驾驶员可靠性与行为研究

M. Papis, Dominik Jastrzebski, Antoni Kopyt, M. Matyjewski, M. Miroslaw
{"title":"基于汽车模拟站测试的ACC系统场景下驾驶员可靠性与行为研究","authors":"M. Papis, Dominik Jastrzebski, Antoni Kopyt, M. Matyjewski, M. Miroslaw","doi":"10.17531/EIN.2019.3.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on human safety is a complex, time consuming, and extremely important process. Especially in the car industry which is a huge market. Such research contains both crashworthiness of a vehicle structure, biomechanical study and research on driver behavior and his/her reactions. It may be tested either by means of computer simulations or real crash experiments. Simulations are time consuming but provide recurrent test. Unfortunately, they need a validation in a form of an experiment [33], which could be expensive. Moreover, sometimes it is impossible to make a recurrent experiment and there is a considerable risk of failure, i.e. in crash tests it may reach 13% [27]. In research on a driver behavior and reaction, both questionnaire studies and simulators can be distinguished. Questionnaire research covers many issues and often relates to the simulator one, i.e.: user knowledge about ADAS [29], in-depth exploration of perceptions towards automated vehicles [4], evaluation of the HMI intuitiveness [8]. Simulator research is being used from 60’s of XX century, when development of car simulators in UCLA [32], GM Styling Staff [3], Table 3. Steady state availability versus for Case 2","PeriodicalId":309533,"journal":{"name":"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driver reliability and behavior study based on a car simulator station tests in ACC system scenarios\",\"authors\":\"M. Papis, Dominik Jastrzebski, Antoni Kopyt, M. Matyjewski, M. Miroslaw\",\"doi\":\"10.17531/EIN.2019.3.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on human safety is a complex, time consuming, and extremely important process. Especially in the car industry which is a huge market. Such research contains both crashworthiness of a vehicle structure, biomechanical study and research on driver behavior and his/her reactions. It may be tested either by means of computer simulations or real crash experiments. Simulations are time consuming but provide recurrent test. Unfortunately, they need a validation in a form of an experiment [33], which could be expensive. Moreover, sometimes it is impossible to make a recurrent experiment and there is a considerable risk of failure, i.e. in crash tests it may reach 13% [27]. In research on a driver behavior and reaction, both questionnaire studies and simulators can be distinguished. Questionnaire research covers many issues and often relates to the simulator one, i.e.: user knowledge about ADAS [29], in-depth exploration of perceptions towards automated vehicles [4], evaluation of the HMI intuitiveness [8]. Simulator research is being used from 60’s of XX century, when development of car simulators in UCLA [32], GM Styling Staff [3], Table 3. Steady state availability versus for Case 2\",\"PeriodicalId\":309533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17531/EIN.2019.3.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekspolatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17531/EIN.2019.3.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

对人体安全的研究是一个复杂、耗时、极其重要的过程。特别是在汽车行业,这是一个巨大的市场。这类研究既包括车辆结构的耐撞性研究,也包括生物力学研究和驾驶员行为及其反应研究。它可以通过计算机模拟或真实的碰撞实验进行测试。模拟是耗时的,但提供了反复的测试。不幸的是,它们需要以实验的形式进行验证,这可能是昂贵的。此外,有时不可能进行重复实验,并且存在相当大的失败风险,即在碰撞测试中可能达到13% b[27]。在对驾驶员行为和反应的研究中,问卷研究和模拟器研究可以区分开来。问卷调查涵盖了许多问题,通常与模拟器相关,即:用户对ADAS的了解程度[29],对自动驾驶汽车感知的深入探索[4],对HMI直观性的评估[8]。模拟器研究从20世纪60年代开始使用,当时在加州大学洛杉矶分校开发汽车模拟器[3],通用汽车造型人员[3],表3。稳态可用性与案例2的对比
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Driver reliability and behavior study based on a car simulator station tests in ACC system scenarios
Research on human safety is a complex, time consuming, and extremely important process. Especially in the car industry which is a huge market. Such research contains both crashworthiness of a vehicle structure, biomechanical study and research on driver behavior and his/her reactions. It may be tested either by means of computer simulations or real crash experiments. Simulations are time consuming but provide recurrent test. Unfortunately, they need a validation in a form of an experiment [33], which could be expensive. Moreover, sometimes it is impossible to make a recurrent experiment and there is a considerable risk of failure, i.e. in crash tests it may reach 13% [27]. In research on a driver behavior and reaction, both questionnaire studies and simulators can be distinguished. Questionnaire research covers many issues and often relates to the simulator one, i.e.: user knowledge about ADAS [29], in-depth exploration of perceptions towards automated vehicles [4], evaluation of the HMI intuitiveness [8]. Simulator research is being used from 60’s of XX century, when development of car simulators in UCLA [32], GM Styling Staff [3], Table 3. Steady state availability versus for Case 2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A system reliability-based design optimization for the scraper chain of scraper conveyors with dependent failure modes Reliability analysis of complex uncertainty multi-state system based on Bayesian network Methodology of overall equipment effectiveness calculation in the context of Industry 4.0 environment The use of a supply chain configuration model to assess the reliability of logistics processes Reliability model of sequence motions and its solving idea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1