需要在传统的面向对象系统中合并基于规则的组件

Bhuwan Lodha, K. Dinesha, Pavan Kumar
{"title":"需要在传统的面向对象系统中合并基于规则的组件","authors":"Bhuwan Lodha, K. Dinesha, Pavan Kumar","doi":"10.1109/ITCC.2005.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System requirements, which define automatic behavior within a domain model, appear variously as business policies, engineering rules, domain laws, constraints, and state transitions. At first glance, such requirements seem easy to implement in the conventional object oriented (OO) space, but when looked closely, the most natural way of expressing such behavior is the rule based approach. Given a seamless bridge between the two paradigms, the combination not only provides ease of programming but also conceptual clarity at a higher level. In this paper, we consider the features of logic languages and their advantages in representation of various aforesaid system requirements. We look at the conventional three tier object oriented architecture and its advantage and disadvantages using different examples. We propose an optimum architecture that combines the best of both. We also apply the proposed architecture in the context of building highly configurable systems.","PeriodicalId":326887,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'05) - Volume II","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Need for incorporating a rule-based component in conventional object oriented systems\",\"authors\":\"Bhuwan Lodha, K. Dinesha, Pavan Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITCC.2005.209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"System requirements, which define automatic behavior within a domain model, appear variously as business policies, engineering rules, domain laws, constraints, and state transitions. At first glance, such requirements seem easy to implement in the conventional object oriented (OO) space, but when looked closely, the most natural way of expressing such behavior is the rule based approach. Given a seamless bridge between the two paradigms, the combination not only provides ease of programming but also conceptual clarity at a higher level. In this paper, we consider the features of logic languages and their advantages in representation of various aforesaid system requirements. We look at the conventional three tier object oriented architecture and its advantage and disadvantages using different examples. We propose an optimum architecture that combines the best of both. We also apply the proposed architecture in the context of building highly configurable systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'05) - Volume II\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'05) - Volume II\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCC.2005.209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'05) - Volume II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCC.2005.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

系统需求定义了领域模型中的自动行为,它们以各种方式出现,如业务策略、工程规则、领域法律、约束和状态转换。乍一看,这样的需求似乎很容易在传统的面向对象(OO)空间中实现,但是仔细观察就会发现,表达这种行为的最自然的方式是基于规则的方法。在两种范式之间建立了无缝的桥梁,这种组合不仅提供了编程的便利性,而且在更高的层次上提供了概念的清晰度。在本文中,我们考虑了逻辑语言的特点及其在表示上述各种系统需求方面的优势。我们通过不同的例子来研究传统的三层面向对象架构及其优缺点。我们提出了一个结合两者优点的最佳架构。我们还将提出的体系结构应用于构建高度可配置系统的上下文中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Need for incorporating a rule-based component in conventional object oriented systems
System requirements, which define automatic behavior within a domain model, appear variously as business policies, engineering rules, domain laws, constraints, and state transitions. At first glance, such requirements seem easy to implement in the conventional object oriented (OO) space, but when looked closely, the most natural way of expressing such behavior is the rule based approach. Given a seamless bridge between the two paradigms, the combination not only provides ease of programming but also conceptual clarity at a higher level. In this paper, we consider the features of logic languages and their advantages in representation of various aforesaid system requirements. We look at the conventional three tier object oriented architecture and its advantage and disadvantages using different examples. We propose an optimum architecture that combines the best of both. We also apply the proposed architecture in the context of building highly configurable systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Component metadata management and publication for the grid A mathematical investigation on retrieval performance evaluation measures of information retrieval algorithm Single-parameter blackjack betting systems inspired by scatter search A time-series biclustering algorithm for revealing co-regulated genes A methodology for evaluating agent toolkits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1