组合交互回归测试:测试用例生成和优先级的研究

Xiao Qu, Myra B. Cohen, Katherine M. Woolf
{"title":"组合交互回归测试:测试用例生成和优先级的研究","authors":"Xiao Qu, Myra B. Cohen, Katherine M. Woolf","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2007.4362638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regression testing is an expensive part of the software maintenance process. Effective regression testing techniques select and order (or prioritize) test cases between successive releases of a program. However, selection and prioritization are dependent on the quality of the initial test suite. An effective and cost efficient test generation technique is combinatorial interaction testing, CIT, which systematically samples all t-way combinations of input parameters. Research on CIT, to date, has focused on single version software systems. There has been little work that empirically assesses the use of CIT test generation as the basis for selection or prioritization. In this paper we examine the effectiveness of CIT across multiple versions of two software subjects. Our results show that CIT performs well in finding seeded faults when compared with an exhaustive test set. We examine several CIT prioritization techniques and compare them with a re-generation/prioritization technique. We find that prioritized and re-generated/prioritized CIT test suites may find faults earlier than unordered CIT test suites, although the re-generated/prioritized test suites sometimes exhibit decreased fault detection.","PeriodicalId":263470,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"168","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combinatorial Interaction Regression Testing: A Study of Test Case Generation and Prioritization\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Qu, Myra B. Cohen, Katherine M. Woolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.2007.4362638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regression testing is an expensive part of the software maintenance process. Effective regression testing techniques select and order (or prioritize) test cases between successive releases of a program. However, selection and prioritization are dependent on the quality of the initial test suite. An effective and cost efficient test generation technique is combinatorial interaction testing, CIT, which systematically samples all t-way combinations of input parameters. Research on CIT, to date, has focused on single version software systems. There has been little work that empirically assesses the use of CIT test generation as the basis for selection or prioritization. In this paper we examine the effectiveness of CIT across multiple versions of two software subjects. Our results show that CIT performs well in finding seeded faults when compared with an exhaustive test set. We examine several CIT prioritization techniques and compare them with a re-generation/prioritization technique. We find that prioritized and re-generated/prioritized CIT test suites may find faults earlier than unordered CIT test suites, although the re-generated/prioritized test suites sometimes exhibit decreased fault detection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"168\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2007.4362638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2007.4362638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 168

摘要

回归测试是软件维护过程中昂贵的一部分。有效的回归测试技术在程序的连续版本之间选择和排序(或优先排序)测试用例。然而,选择和优先级取决于初始测试套件的质量。组合交互测试(CIT)是一种有效且经济的测试生成技术,它系统地对输入参数的所有t向组合进行采样。迄今为止,对CIT的研究主要集中在单版本软件系统上。很少有经验地评估使用CIT测试生成作为选择或优先级的基础的工作。在本文中,我们研究了跨两个软件主题的多个版本的CIT的有效性。结果表明,与穷举测试集相比,CIT在发现种子故障方面表现良好。我们研究了几种CIT优先级技术,并将它们与再生/优先级技术进行了比较。我们发现,优先级和重新生成/优先级的CIT测试套件可能比无序的CIT测试套件更早发现错误,尽管重新生成/优先级的测试套件有时表现出更少的错误检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combinatorial Interaction Regression Testing: A Study of Test Case Generation and Prioritization
Regression testing is an expensive part of the software maintenance process. Effective regression testing techniques select and order (or prioritize) test cases between successive releases of a program. However, selection and prioritization are dependent on the quality of the initial test suite. An effective and cost efficient test generation technique is combinatorial interaction testing, CIT, which systematically samples all t-way combinations of input parameters. Research on CIT, to date, has focused on single version software systems. There has been little work that empirically assesses the use of CIT test generation as the basis for selection or prioritization. In this paper we examine the effectiveness of CIT across multiple versions of two software subjects. Our results show that CIT performs well in finding seeded faults when compared with an exhaustive test set. We examine several CIT prioritization techniques and compare them with a re-generation/prioritization technique. We find that prioritized and re-generated/prioritized CIT test suites may find faults earlier than unordered CIT test suites, although the re-generated/prioritized test suites sometimes exhibit decreased fault detection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm to Support Class Responsibility Assignment The Effect of Communication Overhead on Software Maintenance Project Staffing: a Search-Based Approach Design recovery and maintenance of build systems Package Surface Blueprints: Visually Supporting the Understanding of Package Relationships Finding Unusual Code
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1