通过信仰之前的实践,识别古代和现代的教派和政党的里程碑,比较教义研究与圣训- jama 'ah

hamid naidjate
{"title":"通过信仰之前的实践,识别古代和现代的教派和政党的里程碑,比较教义研究与圣训- jama 'ah","authors":"hamid naidjate","doi":"10.56760/lprp9113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"research subject The idea of the research can be summed up by collecting the practices that scholars have stipulated on the agreement of all sects in the past, and they apply to modern groups; Until they become benchmarks by which these sects and groups are known, and comparing them with the method of Ahl al-Sunnah, and explaining how to use these benchmarks to identify and guard against sects and groups, although the details of their doctrines or beliefs and organizational affiliations are not known. His most important results 1- There are four landmarks; They are: to warn against scholars, to slander heads of state, to communicate secretly without ordinary Muslims, and to link loyalty and disavowal to sects or organizations. 2- These landmarks can be used by any Muslim to take precautions and be wary of their owners, because of their clarity and the absence of the need to specialize in specific Islamic sciences to know them. 3- Make the criterion of loyalty and disavowal based on loyalty to the group or to the organization negative effects and actions on religion, the individual and society. 4- The glorification of references and their sanctification, then obedience and exaggeration in them, then the oath of allegiance in reality or in judgment; They are the foundations of the deviation from the concept of loyalty and disavowal.","PeriodicalId":270236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification milestones of sects and parties, ancient and modern, through practices before beliefs, comparative Doctrinal study with Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama`ah\",\"authors\":\"hamid naidjate\",\"doi\":\"10.56760/lprp9113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"research subject The idea of the research can be summed up by collecting the practices that scholars have stipulated on the agreement of all sects in the past, and they apply to modern groups; Until they become benchmarks by which these sects and groups are known, and comparing them with the method of Ahl al-Sunnah, and explaining how to use these benchmarks to identify and guard against sects and groups, although the details of their doctrines or beliefs and organizational affiliations are not known. His most important results 1- There are four landmarks; They are: to warn against scholars, to slander heads of state, to communicate secretly without ordinary Muslims, and to link loyalty and disavowal to sects or organizations. 2- These landmarks can be used by any Muslim to take precautions and be wary of their owners, because of their clarity and the absence of the need to specialize in specific Islamic sciences to know them. 3- Make the criterion of loyalty and disavowal based on loyalty to the group or to the organization negative effects and actions on religion, the individual and society. 4- The glorification of references and their sanctification, then obedience and exaggeration in them, then the oath of allegiance in reality or in judgment; They are the foundations of the deviation from the concept of loyalty and disavowal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56760/lprp9113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56760/lprp9113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的研究思路可以归纳为:收集以往学者对各教派约定的做法,并将其应用于现代团体;直到它们成为了解这些教派和团体的基准,并将它们与圣训的方法进行比较,并解释如何使用这些基准来识别和防范教派和团体,尽管他们的教义或信仰和组织隶属关系的细节尚不清楚。他最重要的结论1-有四个里程碑;它们是:警告学者,诽谤国家元首,在没有普通穆斯林的情况下秘密交流,以及将忠诚和否认与教派或组织联系起来。这些地标可以被任何穆斯林用来采取预防措施,警惕他们的主人,因为它们很清晰,不需要专门研究特定的伊斯兰科学来了解它们。3-根据对团体或组织的忠诚对宗教、个人和社会的负面影响和行为,制定忠诚和否认的标准。4-赞美和圣化,然后是顺从和夸张,然后是在现实或审判中宣誓效忠;它们是忠诚和否定观念偏离的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification milestones of sects and parties, ancient and modern, through practices before beliefs, comparative Doctrinal study with Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama`ah
research subject The idea of the research can be summed up by collecting the practices that scholars have stipulated on the agreement of all sects in the past, and they apply to modern groups; Until they become benchmarks by which these sects and groups are known, and comparing them with the method of Ahl al-Sunnah, and explaining how to use these benchmarks to identify and guard against sects and groups, although the details of their doctrines or beliefs and organizational affiliations are not known. His most important results 1- There are four landmarks; They are: to warn against scholars, to slander heads of state, to communicate secretly without ordinary Muslims, and to link loyalty and disavowal to sects or organizations. 2- These landmarks can be used by any Muslim to take precautions and be wary of their owners, because of their clarity and the absence of the need to specialize in specific Islamic sciences to know them. 3- Make the criterion of loyalty and disavowal based on loyalty to the group or to the organization negative effects and actions on religion, the individual and society. 4- The glorification of references and their sanctification, then obedience and exaggeration in them, then the oath of allegiance in reality or in judgment; They are the foundations of the deviation from the concept of loyalty and disavowal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
القدرة التنبؤيَّة للوسطية الفكرية لدى طلبة الجامعة في الوصول إلى الانتماء الوطني بيعة علي لأبي بكر رضي الله عنهما "دراسة عقدية" تطبيقاتٌ فقهيةٌ قضائيةٌ لإعمال المقاصد الشرعية في مكافحة الإرهاب الإلكتروني دور القيادة الاستراتيجية في تعزيز الالتزام التنظيمي لدى معلمات المرحلة الثانوية بمدينة الزلفي أثر الغربة في قصص (متاهة كل صيف) للقاصة ليلى أبو العلا
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1