一加一等于二:多或少

Tobias F. Rötheli
{"title":"一加一等于二:多或少","authors":"Tobias F. Rötheli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3760625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note discusses a range of cases where the proposition that one plus one is more or less than two makes sense. Simple examples from the natural world indicate that interaction (reproduction and predator-prey interaction) between addable units can change their sum. A case drawn from commerce documents an example for many similar circumstances where units have more than one dimension. The logical ambiguities described here can hamper human communications and are thus of interest for behavioral studies.","PeriodicalId":314850,"journal":{"name":"Biology & Cognitive Science eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Plus One Equals Two: More or Less\",\"authors\":\"Tobias F. Rötheli\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3760625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note discusses a range of cases where the proposition that one plus one is more or less than two makes sense. Simple examples from the natural world indicate that interaction (reproduction and predator-prey interaction) between addable units can change their sum. A case drawn from commerce documents an example for many similar circumstances where units have more than one dimension. The logical ambiguities described here can hamper human communications and are thus of interest for behavioral studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology & Cognitive Science eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology & Cognitive Science eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology & Cognitive Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了一加一大于或小于二的命题有意义的一系列情况。自然界的简单例子表明,可加单位之间的相互作用(繁殖和捕食者-猎物相互作用)可以改变它们的总和。从商业文件中提取的一个案例是许多类似情况的例子,其中单位具有多个维度。这里描述的逻辑歧义会阻碍人类的交流,因此是行为研究的兴趣所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One Plus One Equals Two: More or Less
This note discusses a range of cases where the proposition that one plus one is more or less than two makes sense. Simple examples from the natural world indicate that interaction (reproduction and predator-prey interaction) between addable units can change their sum. A case drawn from commerce documents an example for many similar circumstances where units have more than one dimension. The logical ambiguities described here can hamper human communications and are thus of interest for behavioral studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
One Plus One Equals Two: More or Less Behaviors of Professional Athletes in Terms of the Big Five Model Due to the Type of Contact of the Sport Discipline Ethical Values and Meta-Ethical Beliefs Guide Deference to Experts Biologists' Consensus on 'When Life Begins' Social Versus Moral Preferences in the Ultimatum Game: A Theoretical Model and an Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1