适用于印尼其他国家(欧盟、澳大利亚、韩国、印度、中国、美国和日本)税收政策的比较分析

Muhammad Rheza Ramadhan, Anindya Fauziyah Basuki
{"title":"适用于印尼其他国家(欧盟、澳大利亚、韩国、印度、中国、美国和日本)税收政策的比较分析","authors":"Muhammad Rheza Ramadhan, Anindya Fauziyah Basuki","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v1i3.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia has experienced an increase in users of e-commerce platforms, resulting in increased income for sellers, both individuals and entities, who conduct online sales transactions. Therefore, the Indonesian government sets a tax policy for online sellers. However, the Indonesian government still has several obstacles, one of which is that e-commerce transactions have an eternal nature. To answer these problems, the author compares the taxation policies on e-commerce transactions that apply in Indonesia with the tax policies on e-commerce transactions that apply in other countries, namely the European Union, Australia, South Korea, India, China, the United States, and Japan. The writing method used by the author is a literature study method. This paper shows that the taxation policy on e-commerce transactions in Indonesia, the European Union, Australia, South Korea, India, China, the United States, and Japan imposes a Value Added Tax (VAT) or the like as a consumption tax on goods. And services as well as sales tax and Income Tax. In addition, several countries have created platforms or special teams to manage taxes from e-commerce transactions, namely the platform Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS), now called OSS (European Union); Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) (South Korea); Professional Team for E-Commerce Taxation (Protect) (Japan). Therefore, Indonesia needs to follow the example of the European Union, South Korea, and Japan in terms of establishing a system or team dedicated to managing tax collection from e-commerce transactions","PeriodicalId":414894,"journal":{"name":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KOMPARASI KEBIJAKAN PERPAJAKAN TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE YANG BERLAKU DI INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA LAIN (UNI EROPA, AUSTRALIA, KOREA SELATAN, INDIA, TIONGKOK, AMERIKA SERIKAT, DAN JEPANG)\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Rheza Ramadhan, Anindya Fauziyah Basuki\",\"doi\":\"10.53866/jimi.v1i3.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indonesia has experienced an increase in users of e-commerce platforms, resulting in increased income for sellers, both individuals and entities, who conduct online sales transactions. Therefore, the Indonesian government sets a tax policy for online sellers. However, the Indonesian government still has several obstacles, one of which is that e-commerce transactions have an eternal nature. To answer these problems, the author compares the taxation policies on e-commerce transactions that apply in Indonesia with the tax policies on e-commerce transactions that apply in other countries, namely the European Union, Australia, South Korea, India, China, the United States, and Japan. The writing method used by the author is a literature study method. This paper shows that the taxation policy on e-commerce transactions in Indonesia, the European Union, Australia, South Korea, India, China, the United States, and Japan imposes a Value Added Tax (VAT) or the like as a consumption tax on goods. And services as well as sales tax and Income Tax. In addition, several countries have created platforms or special teams to manage taxes from e-commerce transactions, namely the platform Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS), now called OSS (European Union); Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) (South Korea); Professional Team for E-Commerce Taxation (Protect) (Japan). Therefore, Indonesia needs to follow the example of the European Union, South Korea, and Japan in terms of establishing a system or team dedicated to managing tax collection from e-commerce transactions\",\"PeriodicalId\":414894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v1i3.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v1i3.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

印度尼西亚的电子商务平台用户数量有所增加,导致进行在线销售交易的卖家(包括个人和实体)收入增加。因此,印尼政府为网上卖家制定了税收政策。然而,印尼政府仍然有几个障碍,其中之一是电子商务交易具有永恒的性质。为了回答这些问题,作者将印度尼西亚适用于电子商务交易的税收政策与欧盟、澳大利亚、韩国、印度、中国、美国和日本等其他国家适用于电子商务交易的税收政策进行了比较。作者使用的写作方法是文献研究法。本文表明,印度尼西亚、欧盟、澳大利亚、韩国、印度、中国、美国和日本等国家的电子商务交易税收政策将增值税(VAT)等作为商品的消费税征收。还有营业税和所得税。此外,一些国家已经创建了平台或专门团队来管理电子商务交易的税收,即迷你一站式商店(MOSS)平台,现在称为OSS(欧盟);公平交易委员会(韩国);电子商务税务专业团队(Protect)(日本)因此,印尼需要效仿欧盟、韩国和日本,建立一个专门管理电子商务交易税收的系统或团队
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS KOMPARASI KEBIJAKAN PERPAJAKAN TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE YANG BERLAKU DI INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA LAIN (UNI EROPA, AUSTRALIA, KOREA SELATAN, INDIA, TIONGKOK, AMERIKA SERIKAT, DAN JEPANG)
Indonesia has experienced an increase in users of e-commerce platforms, resulting in increased income for sellers, both individuals and entities, who conduct online sales transactions. Therefore, the Indonesian government sets a tax policy for online sellers. However, the Indonesian government still has several obstacles, one of which is that e-commerce transactions have an eternal nature. To answer these problems, the author compares the taxation policies on e-commerce transactions that apply in Indonesia with the tax policies on e-commerce transactions that apply in other countries, namely the European Union, Australia, South Korea, India, China, the United States, and Japan. The writing method used by the author is a literature study method. This paper shows that the taxation policy on e-commerce transactions in Indonesia, the European Union, Australia, South Korea, India, China, the United States, and Japan imposes a Value Added Tax (VAT) or the like as a consumption tax on goods. And services as well as sales tax and Income Tax. In addition, several countries have created platforms or special teams to manage taxes from e-commerce transactions, namely the platform Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS), now called OSS (European Union); Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) (South Korea); Professional Team for E-Commerce Taxation (Protect) (Japan). Therefore, Indonesia needs to follow the example of the European Union, South Korea, and Japan in terms of establishing a system or team dedicated to managing tax collection from e-commerce transactions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENGARUH ELECTRONIC WORD OF MOUTH (E-WOM) TERHADAP LOYALITAS KONSUMEN DENGAN KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI (Studi Kasus Pada Konsumen Wanita Monokrom Store Yogyakarta) ANALISA OPTIMASI WAKTU DAN BIAYA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE DURATION COST TRADE OFF PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN PENANGANAN ROB ERETAN KABUPATEN INDRAMAYU JAWA BARAT HAK MEWARIS ANAK ANGKAT DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM PERDATA DAN HUKUM ISLAM FENOMENA POLITIK IDENTITAS DALAM PEMILU DI INDONESIA ANALISIS STRUKTUR KOLOM PADA GEDUNG PARKIR RUMAH SAKIT DI SEMARANG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1