通过电子病历系统审计从患者护理路径中挖掘偏差

He Zhang, S. Mehrotra, David M. Liebovitz, Carl A. Gunter, B. Malin
{"title":"通过电子病历系统审计从患者护理路径中挖掘偏差","authors":"He Zhang, S. Mehrotra, David M. Liebovitz, Carl A. Gunter, B. Malin","doi":"10.1145/2544102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In electronic medical record (EMR) systems, administrators often provide EMR users with broad access privileges, which may leave the system vulnerable to misuse and abuse. Given that patient care is based on a coordinated workflow, we hypothesize that care pathways can be represented as the progression of a patient through a system and introduce a strategy to model the patient’s flow as a sequence of accesses defined over a graph. Elements in the sequence correspond to features associated with the access transaction (e.g., reason for access). Based on this motivation, we model patterns of patient record usage, which may indicate deviations from care workflows. We evaluate our approach using several months of data from a large academic medical center. Empirical results show that this framework finds a small portion of accesses constitute outliers from such flows. We also observe that the violation patterns deviate for different types of medical services. Analysis of our results suggests greater deviation from normal access patterns by nonclinical users. We simulate anomalies in the context of real accesses to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method for different medical services. As an illustration of the capabilities of our method, it was observed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the Pediatrics service was found to be 0.9166. The results suggest that our approach is competitive with, and often better than, the existing state-of-the-art in its outlier detection performance. At the same time, our method is more efficient, by orders of magnitude, than previous approaches, allowing for detection of thousands of accesses in seconds.","PeriodicalId":178565,"journal":{"name":"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mining Deviations from Patient Care Pathways via Electronic Medical Record System Audits\",\"authors\":\"He Zhang, S. Mehrotra, David M. Liebovitz, Carl A. Gunter, B. Malin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2544102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In electronic medical record (EMR) systems, administrators often provide EMR users with broad access privileges, which may leave the system vulnerable to misuse and abuse. Given that patient care is based on a coordinated workflow, we hypothesize that care pathways can be represented as the progression of a patient through a system and introduce a strategy to model the patient’s flow as a sequence of accesses defined over a graph. Elements in the sequence correspond to features associated with the access transaction (e.g., reason for access). Based on this motivation, we model patterns of patient record usage, which may indicate deviations from care workflows. We evaluate our approach using several months of data from a large academic medical center. Empirical results show that this framework finds a small portion of accesses constitute outliers from such flows. We also observe that the violation patterns deviate for different types of medical services. Analysis of our results suggests greater deviation from normal access patterns by nonclinical users. We simulate anomalies in the context of real accesses to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method for different medical services. As an illustration of the capabilities of our method, it was observed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the Pediatrics service was found to be 0.9166. The results suggest that our approach is competitive with, and often better than, the existing state-of-the-art in its outlier detection performance. At the same time, our method is more efficient, by orders of magnitude, than previous approaches, allowing for detection of thousands of accesses in seconds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2544102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2544102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在电子医疗记录(EMR)系统中,管理员通常为EMR用户提供广泛的访问权限,这可能使系统容易被误用和滥用。鉴于患者护理是基于协调的工作流程,我们假设护理路径可以表示为患者通过系统的进展,并引入一种策略,将患者流程建模为定义在图上的访问序列。序列中的元素对应于与访问事务相关的特征(例如,访问原因)。基于这一动机,我们建立了患者记录使用模式的模型,这可能表明与护理工作流程的偏差。我们使用一个大型学术医疗中心几个月的数据来评估我们的方法。实证结果表明,该框架发现一小部分访问构成了此类流的异常值。我们还注意到,不同类型的医疗服务的违反模式有所不同。分析我们的结果表明,更大的偏离正常访问模式的非临床用户。我们模拟了真实访问环境中的异常情况,以说明所提出的方法对不同医疗服务的效率。为了说明我们的方法的能力,观察到儿科服务的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积为0.9166。结果表明,我们的方法在异常值检测性能方面与现有的最先进的方法相竞争,并且通常优于现有的方法。与此同时,我们的方法比以前的方法效率更高,可以在几秒钟内检测到数千个访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mining Deviations from Patient Care Pathways via Electronic Medical Record System Audits
In electronic medical record (EMR) systems, administrators often provide EMR users with broad access privileges, which may leave the system vulnerable to misuse and abuse. Given that patient care is based on a coordinated workflow, we hypothesize that care pathways can be represented as the progression of a patient through a system and introduce a strategy to model the patient’s flow as a sequence of accesses defined over a graph. Elements in the sequence correspond to features associated with the access transaction (e.g., reason for access). Based on this motivation, we model patterns of patient record usage, which may indicate deviations from care workflows. We evaluate our approach using several months of data from a large academic medical center. Empirical results show that this framework finds a small portion of accesses constitute outliers from such flows. We also observe that the violation patterns deviate for different types of medical services. Analysis of our results suggests greater deviation from normal access patterns by nonclinical users. We simulate anomalies in the context of real accesses to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method for different medical services. As an illustration of the capabilities of our method, it was observed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the Pediatrics service was found to be 0.9166. The results suggest that our approach is competitive with, and often better than, the existing state-of-the-art in its outlier detection performance. At the same time, our method is more efficient, by orders of magnitude, than previous approaches, allowing for detection of thousands of accesses in seconds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Social Media to Analyze Public Concerns and Policy Responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong COVID-Safe Spatial Occupancy Monitoring Using OFDM-Based Features and Passive WiFi Samples SymptomID: A Framework for Rapid Symptom Identification in Pandemics Using News Reports Leveraging Individual and Collective Regularity to Profile and Segment User Locations from Mobile Phone Data Write Like a Pro or an Amateur? Effect of Medical Language Formality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1