第82条的未来:剖析冲突

D. Gerber
{"title":"第82条的未来:剖析冲突","authors":"D. Gerber","doi":"10.5040/9781472560353.ch-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underlying the recurring debates over the future of Article 82 EC (now Article 102) are competing images of what its goals are and should be. Such debates about the law relating to dominant enterprises are not new, and they are also not likely to end, because the legal concept of \"abuse\" is sufficiently abstract and capacious to allow multiple conceptions of its goals. Where goals become contested and controversial, however, debates can lead to confusion and uncertainty rather than progress in thinking about the issues, and this threatens to occur in the context of discussions of Article 82 and its future. Clashing images of the goals of that provision have yielded much uncertainty about the future of the law in this area. They have also distorted images of both the existing law and of newer alternatives to it. This impedes the capacity of European judges and administrators to apply the law consistently and effectively. This article identifies and assesses the lines and contours of these debates and the images of law, economics and European integration that swirl within them.","PeriodicalId":306463,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Article 82: Dissecting the Conflict\",\"authors\":\"D. Gerber\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781472560353.ch-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Underlying the recurring debates over the future of Article 82 EC (now Article 102) are competing images of what its goals are and should be. Such debates about the law relating to dominant enterprises are not new, and they are also not likely to end, because the legal concept of \\\"abuse\\\" is sufficiently abstract and capacious to allow multiple conceptions of its goals. Where goals become contested and controversial, however, debates can lead to confusion and uncertainty rather than progress in thinking about the issues, and this threatens to occur in the context of discussions of Article 82 and its future. Clashing images of the goals of that provision have yielded much uncertainty about the future of the law in this area. They have also distorted images of both the existing law and of newer alternatives to it. This impedes the capacity of European judges and administrators to apply the law consistently and effectively. This article identifies and assesses the lines and contours of these debates and the images of law, economics and European integration that swirl within them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560353.ch-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560353.ch-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在关于欧盟第82条(现在的第102条)未来的反复辩论的基础上,是关于其目标是什么和应该是什么的相互竞争的形象。这种关于支配性企业的法律的辩论并不新鲜,也不太可能结束,因为“滥用”的法律概念足够抽象和宽泛,允许对其目标有多种概念。然而,在目标变得有争议和有争议的地方,辩论可能导致混乱和不确定,而不是在思考问题方面取得进展,这可能在讨论第82条及其未来的情况下发生。这一规定的目标相互冲突,给该法律在这方面的未来带来了很大的不确定性。他们还歪曲了现有法律和新法律的形象。这妨碍了欧洲法官和行政人员一贯有效地适用法律的能力。本文识别并评估了这些辩论的轮廓和轮廓,以及在其中盘旋的法律、经济和欧洲一体化的形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Future of Article 82: Dissecting the Conflict
Underlying the recurring debates over the future of Article 82 EC (now Article 102) are competing images of what its goals are and should be. Such debates about the law relating to dominant enterprises are not new, and they are also not likely to end, because the legal concept of "abuse" is sufficiently abstract and capacious to allow multiple conceptions of its goals. Where goals become contested and controversial, however, debates can lead to confusion and uncertainty rather than progress in thinking about the issues, and this threatens to occur in the context of discussions of Article 82 and its future. Clashing images of the goals of that provision have yielded much uncertainty about the future of the law in this area. They have also distorted images of both the existing law and of newer alternatives to it. This impedes the capacity of European judges and administrators to apply the law consistently and effectively. This article identifies and assesses the lines and contours of these debates and the images of law, economics and European integration that swirl within them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Competition Overdose': Curing Markets from Themselves? Ten Points for Discussion Exploitative Abuses: Recent Trends and Comparative Perspectives Setting the Edge: How the NCAA Can Defend Amateurism by Allowing Third Party Compensation Competition in Digital Markets: A Review of Expert Reports The Israeli Statute on National Book Price Maintenance - A Critical Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1