符合逻辑和成本效益的校准间隔

Tyler Roach
{"title":"符合逻辑和成本效益的校准间隔","authors":"Tyler Roach","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periodic calibration does not prevent out-of-tolerances from occurring, but with a well-managed recall program, the risk can be minimized. Managing calibration recall intervals can be a perplexing task and sometimes seem somewhat arbitrary. Do I use the manufacturer's recommended interval? Do I use the ever so popular, yet arbitrary 12-month interval? Or, do I just use the interval that was used last time my unit was calibrated? Selecting an interval that is too long could save on excessive calibration costs, however it could also introduce the additional unwanted risk of using an out of tolerance item. An interval that is too short would eliminate that risk, but calibration costs will rise. The goal is to have the perfect Goldilocks situation to find an interval that is just right. One that will reduce calibration costs, yet still give you confidence that it will still be in-tolerance at the next calibration event. A simple examination of past calibration history, combined with a few strategic confidence checks will make managing recall intervals logical and cost effective.","PeriodicalId":432978,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logical And Cost Effective Calibration Intervals\",\"authors\":\"Tyler Roach\",\"doi\":\"10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Periodic calibration does not prevent out-of-tolerances from occurring, but with a well-managed recall program, the risk can be minimized. Managing calibration recall intervals can be a perplexing task and sometimes seem somewhat arbitrary. Do I use the manufacturer's recommended interval? Do I use the ever so popular, yet arbitrary 12-month interval? Or, do I just use the interval that was used last time my unit was calibrated? Selecting an interval that is too long could save on excessive calibration costs, however it could also introduce the additional unwanted risk of using an out of tolerance item. An interval that is too short would eliminate that risk, but calibration costs will rise. The goal is to have the perfect Goldilocks situation to find an interval that is just right. One that will reduce calibration costs, yet still give you confidence that it will still be in-tolerance at the next calibration event. A simple examination of past calibration history, combined with a few strategic confidence checks will make managing recall intervals logical and cost effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定期校准并不能防止超出公差的发生,但通过管理良好的召回程序,可以将风险降至最低。管理校准召回间隔可能是一项令人困惑的任务,有时似乎有些武断。我是否使用制造商推荐的间隔?我是否应该使用非常流行但却很随意的12个月间隔?或者,我只是使用上次校准单位时使用的间隔?选择太长的间隔可以节省过多的校准成本,但是它也可能引入使用超出公差项的额外不必要的风险。间隔时间过短可以消除这种风险,但校准成本会上升。我们的目标是找到一个完美的“金发姑娘”状态,找到一个恰到好处的间隔。这将降低校准成本,但仍然给你信心,在下一次校准事件中它仍然是不允许的。对过去校准历史的简单检查,结合一些战略置信度检查,将使管理召回间隔合乎逻辑且具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Logical And Cost Effective Calibration Intervals
Periodic calibration does not prevent out-of-tolerances from occurring, but with a well-managed recall program, the risk can be minimized. Managing calibration recall intervals can be a perplexing task and sometimes seem somewhat arbitrary. Do I use the manufacturer's recommended interval? Do I use the ever so popular, yet arbitrary 12-month interval? Or, do I just use the interval that was used last time my unit was calibrated? Selecting an interval that is too long could save on excessive calibration costs, however it could also introduce the additional unwanted risk of using an out of tolerance item. An interval that is too short would eliminate that risk, but calibration costs will rise. The goal is to have the perfect Goldilocks situation to find an interval that is just right. One that will reduce calibration costs, yet still give you confidence that it will still be in-tolerance at the next calibration event. A simple examination of past calibration history, combined with a few strategic confidence checks will make managing recall intervals logical and cost effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Counting Electrons to Calibrating Ammeters: Improved Methodologies for Traceable Measurements of  Small Electric Currents  Metrology Outreach and Training: A Fulbright Experience in Mexico Characterization of the Dimensions of Internal Gap in a Glass Artifact Using a Laser Triangulation Probe New Automated Coaxial AC Bridge for Rapid Calibration of AC Resistors New NATO Standard ALogP-33 NATO Requirements for Calibration Support of Test & Measurement  Equipment 
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1