民事诉讼法争议主体第三人无独立请求权:构建新的法律结构之路

Dmitriy A. Guziy
{"title":"民事诉讼法争议主体第三人无独立请求权:构建新的法律结构之路","authors":"Dmitriy A. Guziy","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-5-12-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article the statutory concept of non-party interveners is analyzed from a new perspective. The author stands out the idea that substantive nexus of such persons doesn’t always occur with one of the parties only. It is drawn out and proved that it possibly occurs with both parties simultaneously, with the other non-party interveners. The author casts doubt on the prevailing abstract concept and proves that sometimes judgement may have an impact on rights and responsibilities of non-party interveners not nearly only in relation to one of the parties. The diversity of its potential substantive impact is drawn out. Distinguishing the issue in law with the disputed substantive legal matter the author concludes that non-party interveners may be subjects of the latter. Such aspect should be considered as constitutive feature of the relevant statutory concept.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third Parties Filing No Independent Claims with Respect to the Dispute Subject in the Civil Procedure Law: On the Way Towards the Formation of a New Legal Structure\",\"authors\":\"Dmitriy A. Guziy\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-5-12-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article the statutory concept of non-party interveners is analyzed from a new perspective. The author stands out the idea that substantive nexus of such persons doesn’t always occur with one of the parties only. It is drawn out and proved that it possibly occurs with both parties simultaneously, with the other non-party interveners. The author casts doubt on the prevailing abstract concept and proves that sometimes judgement may have an impact on rights and responsibilities of non-party interveners not nearly only in relation to one of the parties. The diversity of its potential substantive impact is drawn out. Distinguishing the issue in law with the disputed substantive legal matter the author concludes that non-party interveners may be subjects of the latter. Such aspect should be considered as constitutive feature of the relevant statutory concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-5-12-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-5-12-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从新的视角分析了非当事人干预人的法定概念。作者认为,这些人的实质联系并不总是只与一方当事人发生。提出并证明了它可能同时发生在双方,与其他非党派的干预者。作者对普遍存在的抽象概念表示怀疑,并证明有时判决可能对非当事人干预者的权利和责任产生影响,而不仅仅是对当事人之一。其潜在的实质性影响的多样性被拉长。将法律问题与有争议的实体法律事项区分开来,作者得出结论,非当事人干预者可能是后者的主体。这方面应被视为相关法律概念的构成特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Third Parties Filing No Independent Claims with Respect to the Dispute Subject in the Civil Procedure Law: On the Way Towards the Formation of a New Legal Structure
In the article the statutory concept of non-party interveners is analyzed from a new perspective. The author stands out the idea that substantive nexus of such persons doesn’t always occur with one of the parties only. It is drawn out and proved that it possibly occurs with both parties simultaneously, with the other non-party interveners. The author casts doubt on the prevailing abstract concept and proves that sometimes judgement may have an impact on rights and responsibilities of non-party interveners not nearly only in relation to one of the parties. The diversity of its potential substantive impact is drawn out. Distinguishing the issue in law with the disputed substantive legal matter the author concludes that non-party interveners may be subjects of the latter. Such aspect should be considered as constitutive feature of the relevant statutory concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abuse of Law in the Area of Insolvency (Bankruptcy) On the Need for the Unification of Provisions of the Institution of Parties to a Case in Procedural Branches of Russian Law Aims of the Civil Procedure in Russia and France: Common Features and Differences Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure Collective litigation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1