{"title":"解开共同的G.H.A . Juynboll理论和“Ulum Al-Hadis”的经典传统在女性圣训的例子中是缺乏理智的","authors":"Khairul Amin, Aisyah Chairil","doi":"10.24036/kwkib.v3i2.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tries to disscuss the application of G.H.A Juynboll common link’s theory and Isnad convetional criticize (‘Ulum Al-Hadis) The application of critical theory of Isnad do in comparative analysze frame. The issue used as an object of the study is the hadith on women’s lack of reason which finding on kuttub al sittah or six primary books on hadith. The hadith is quite tendentious or can be categorized as misogynistic hadith from a gender perspective (feminism), on the contrary, Muslim scholars have provided adequate rebuttals and explanations to this attack. Anyway, this research is limited to isnad criticism only, does not touch on the hadith matan especially on its meaning exploration or debates. The final result is about the hadith’s authenticity status based on isnad which is based on different methodology of each scholarship. ","PeriodicalId":387778,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kawakib","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diferensiasi Teori Common Link G.H.A Juynboll dan Tradisi ‘Ulum Al-Hadis Klasik dalam kasus Sanad Hadis Wanita Kurang Akal\",\"authors\":\"Khairul Amin, Aisyah Chairil\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/kwkib.v3i2.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article tries to disscuss the application of G.H.A Juynboll common link’s theory and Isnad convetional criticize (‘Ulum Al-Hadis) The application of critical theory of Isnad do in comparative analysze frame. The issue used as an object of the study is the hadith on women’s lack of reason which finding on kuttub al sittah or six primary books on hadith. The hadith is quite tendentious or can be categorized as misogynistic hadith from a gender perspective (feminism), on the contrary, Muslim scholars have provided adequate rebuttals and explanations to this attack. Anyway, this research is limited to isnad criticism only, does not touch on the hadith matan especially on its meaning exploration or debates. The final result is about the hadith’s authenticity status based on isnad which is based on different methodology of each scholarship. \",\"PeriodicalId\":387778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Kawakib\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Kawakib\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/kwkib.v3i2.106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kawakib","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/kwkib.v3i2.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文试图探讨G.H.A Juynboll的共同联系理论和Isnad的传统批判(' Ulum al - ha迪斯)在比较分析框架中的应用。作为研究对象的问题是关于妇女缺乏理性的圣训,这是在kuttub al sittah或六本关于圣训的主要书籍中发现的。从性别的角度(女权主义)来看,该圣训具有相当的倾向性或可归类为厌女圣训,相反,穆斯林学者对这种攻击提供了充分的反驳和解释。无论如何,本研究仅局限于对圣训的批评,并未涉及圣训,尤其是对其意义的探索或争论。最后的结果是基于isnad的圣训真实性地位,isnad是基于不同的学术方法。
Diferensiasi Teori Common Link G.H.A Juynboll dan Tradisi ‘Ulum Al-Hadis Klasik dalam kasus Sanad Hadis Wanita Kurang Akal
This article tries to disscuss the application of G.H.A Juynboll common link’s theory and Isnad convetional criticize (‘Ulum Al-Hadis) The application of critical theory of Isnad do in comparative analysze frame. The issue used as an object of the study is the hadith on women’s lack of reason which finding on kuttub al sittah or six primary books on hadith. The hadith is quite tendentious or can be categorized as misogynistic hadith from a gender perspective (feminism), on the contrary, Muslim scholars have provided adequate rebuttals and explanations to this attack. Anyway, this research is limited to isnad criticism only, does not touch on the hadith matan especially on its meaning exploration or debates. The final result is about the hadith’s authenticity status based on isnad which is based on different methodology of each scholarship.