弹性缓存平台缓存策略的比较评价

Xiulei Qin, Wen-bo Zhang, Wei Wang, Jun Wei, Hua Zhong, Tao Huang
{"title":"弹性缓存平台缓存策略的比较评价","authors":"Xiulei Qin, Wen-bo Zhang, Wei Wang, Jun Wei, Hua Zhong, Tao Huang","doi":"10.1109/QSIC.2011.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rapid development of cloud computing, traditional TP applications are evloving into the Extreme Transaction Processing (XTP) applications which are characterized by exceptionally demanding performance, scalability, availability, security, manageability and dependability require requirements, elastic caching platforms (ECPs) are introduced to help meet these requirements. Three popular cache strategies for ECPs have been proposed, say replicated strategy, partitioned strategy and near strategy. According to our investigations, many ECPs support multiple cache strategies. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of the three cache strategies using the TPC-W benchmark. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first evaluation of distributed cache strategies for ECPs. The main contribution of this work is guidelines that could help system administrators decide effectively which cache strategy would perform better under different conditions. Our work shows that the selection of the best cache strategy is related with workload patterns, cluster size and the number of concurrent users. We also find that four important metrics (number of \"get\" operations, message throughput, get/put ratio, and cache hit rate) could be used to help characterize the current condition.","PeriodicalId":309774,"journal":{"name":"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Evaluation of Cache Strategies for Elastic Caching Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Xiulei Qin, Wen-bo Zhang, Wei Wang, Jun Wei, Hua Zhong, Tao Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QSIC.2011.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the rapid development of cloud computing, traditional TP applications are evloving into the Extreme Transaction Processing (XTP) applications which are characterized by exceptionally demanding performance, scalability, availability, security, manageability and dependability require requirements, elastic caching platforms (ECPs) are introduced to help meet these requirements. Three popular cache strategies for ECPs have been proposed, say replicated strategy, partitioned strategy and near strategy. According to our investigations, many ECPs support multiple cache strategies. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of the three cache strategies using the TPC-W benchmark. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first evaluation of distributed cache strategies for ECPs. The main contribution of this work is guidelines that could help system administrators decide effectively which cache strategy would perform better under different conditions. Our work shows that the selection of the best cache strategy is related with workload patterns, cluster size and the number of concurrent users. We also find that four important metrics (number of \\\"get\\\" operations, message throughput, get/put ratio, and cache hit rate) could be used to help characterize the current condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2011.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2011.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

随着云计算的快速发展,传统的TP应用程序正在向极限事务处理(XTP)应用程序发展,XTP应用程序对性能、可伸缩性、可用性、安全性、可管理性和可靠性要求极高,弹性缓存平台(ECPs)的引入有助于满足这些需求。目前提出了三种常用的ecp缓存策略,即复制策略、分区策略和接近策略。根据我们的调查,许多ecp支持多种缓存策略。在本文中,我们使用TPC-W基准评估了三种缓存策略的影响。据我们所知,本文是对ecp分布式缓存策略的首次评估。这项工作的主要贡献是指导方针,这些指导方针可以帮助系统管理员有效地决定哪种缓存策略在不同条件下执行得更好。我们的研究表明,最佳缓存策略的选择与工作负载模式、集群大小和并发用户数量有关。我们还发现可以使用四个重要指标(“get”操作的次数、消息吞吐量、get/put比率和缓存命中率)来帮助描述当前状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Evaluation of Cache Strategies for Elastic Caching Platforms
With the rapid development of cloud computing, traditional TP applications are evloving into the Extreme Transaction Processing (XTP) applications which are characterized by exceptionally demanding performance, scalability, availability, security, manageability and dependability require requirements, elastic caching platforms (ECPs) are introduced to help meet these requirements. Three popular cache strategies for ECPs have been proposed, say replicated strategy, partitioned strategy and near strategy. According to our investigations, many ECPs support multiple cache strategies. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of the three cache strategies using the TPC-W benchmark. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first evaluation of distributed cache strategies for ECPs. The main contribution of this work is guidelines that could help system administrators decide effectively which cache strategy would perform better under different conditions. Our work shows that the selection of the best cache strategy is related with workload patterns, cluster size and the number of concurrent users. We also find that four important metrics (number of "get" operations, message throughput, get/put ratio, and cache hit rate) could be used to help characterize the current condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Balancing Determinism, Memory Consumption and Throughput for RTSJ-Based Real-Time Applications BAM: A Requirements Validation and Verification Framework for Business Process Models The IntiSa Approach: Test Input Data Generation for Non-primitive Data Types by Means of SMT Solver Based Bounded Model Checking Implementing Service Collaboration Based on Decentralized Mediation An Automatic Performance Modeling Approach to Capacity Planning for Multi-service Web Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1