Javier Muguerza与jurgen Habermas的辩论。(关于个人与社会之间的政治关系)

Pablo Ródenas Utray
{"title":"Javier Muguerza与jurgen Habermas的辩论。(关于个人与社会之间的政治关系)","authors":"Pablo Ródenas Utray","doi":"10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the philosophical debate between Muguerza and Habermas, starting with the meeting of the two in the summer of 1994 in Madrid. To this end, some of the core aspects of their respective ethical and legal thoughts are interpreted and apostilled, both in their agreements and in their disagreements. The text focuses on the controversy between two of their apparently irreducible positions. Namely, the “primacy of the moral conscience of the individual”, defended by Muguerza, and the “primacy of the legal law of society”, advocated by Habermas. The paper concludes by suggesting a third approach, which methodically tempers the controversy, in reference to the duality of the “individual” constituted in-intra-societal relationship, and the “society” instituted by individuals-in-inter-relationship","PeriodicalId":364417,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El debate de Javier Muguerza con Jürgen Habermas. (A propósito de la relación iuspoli(é)tica entre individuo y sociedad)\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Ródenas Utray\",\"doi\":\"10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the philosophical debate between Muguerza and Habermas, starting with the meeting of the two in the summer of 1994 in Madrid. To this end, some of the core aspects of their respective ethical and legal thoughts are interpreted and apostilled, both in their agreements and in their disagreements. The text focuses on the controversy between two of their apparently irreducible positions. Namely, the “primacy of the moral conscience of the individual”, defended by Muguerza, and the “primacy of the legal law of society”, advocated by Habermas. The paper concludes by suggesting a third approach, which methodically tempers the controversy, in reference to the duality of the “individual” constituted in-intra-societal relationship, and the “society” instituted by individuals-in-inter-relationship\",\"PeriodicalId\":364417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Filosofía Laguna\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Filosofía Laguna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.laguna.2022.50.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从1994年夏两人在马德里的会面开始,探讨穆古扎与哈贝马斯之间的哲学辩论。为此,他们各自的伦理和法律思想的一些核心方面在他们的同意和分歧中得到解释和阐述。这篇文章聚焦于他们两个显然不可简化的立场之间的争论。即Muguerza所捍卫的“个人道德良知的首要性”和Habermas所倡导的“社会法律的首要性”。最后,本文提出了第三种方法,即在社会内部关系中构成的“个人”和在相互关系中由个人建立的“社会”的二元性,这一方法有条不紊地缓和了争议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El debate de Javier Muguerza con Jürgen Habermas. (A propósito de la relación iuspoli(é)tica entre individuo y sociedad)
This paper explores the philosophical debate between Muguerza and Habermas, starting with the meeting of the two in the summer of 1994 in Madrid. To this end, some of the core aspects of their respective ethical and legal thoughts are interpreted and apostilled, both in their agreements and in their disagreements. The text focuses on the controversy between two of their apparently irreducible positions. Namely, the “primacy of the moral conscience of the individual”, defended by Muguerza, and the “primacy of the legal law of society”, advocated by Habermas. The paper concludes by suggesting a third approach, which methodically tempers the controversy, in reference to the duality of the “individual” constituted in-intra-societal relationship, and the “society” instituted by individuals-in-inter-relationship
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Respiración vulnerable. Reflexiones ecosóficas sobre un mundo irrespirable Oskar Beker y la fenomenología / Oskar Becker and Phenomenology. Jochen Sattler (ed.), Oskar Becker im phänomenologischen Kontext, Wilhem Fink Verlag, München, 2020, 216 pp Realidad y ficción transhumanista La ética del discurso y las nuevas filosofías del sujeto ¿Cómo defender el Estado del bienestar sin medios de regulación sistémica? Habermas y las nuevas energías utópicas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1