非特异性慢性腰痛患者与健康对照者臀中肌活动的肌电图分析

R. Pruthviraj, Baby Lalrinkimi, P. Archana, Sneha Banavara Shyamprasad
{"title":"非特异性慢性腰痛患者与健康对照者臀中肌活动的肌电图分析","authors":"R. Pruthviraj, Baby Lalrinkimi, P. Archana, Sneha Banavara Shyamprasad","doi":"10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: The functioning of the hip and trunk muscles has an effect on low backregion. Gluteus medius (Gmed) being the primary hip abductor plays a significant role in maintaining thestability of the pelvis. Despite the significance, this muscle activity is least addressed and is also thoughtto be one among the major causes of pain in the low back. The aim of the study was to compare theactivity of Gmed in non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) and healthy individuals using SurfaceElectromyography (SEMG).Methods: 506 subjects were screened, of which 200 subjects were selected. Group A: NSCLBP (n=100)and GROUP B: Healthy controls (n=100). Both groups were instructed to perform maximum voluntarycontractions. The mean root mean square (RMS) value of Gmed muscle activity for the exercise task wasrecorded and analyzed using SEMG.Results: The results demonstrated that the mean RMS value of the right Gmed muscle activity for GROUPA was lesser (53.00 ± 24.81) than GROUP B (87.9 ± 37.47). The mean RMS value of the left Gmed activitywas also lesser for GROUP A (55.99 ± 27.21) compared to GROUP B (89.72 ± 39.83). The difference inmeans between the two groups showed highly significant outcome (P<0.001).Conclusion: The study concluded that the muscle activity of Gmed between the groups was lesser in GroupA compared to Group B indicating differential activation of the muscle in people with NSCLBP. However,there was no significant difference in mean RMS value of the right and left Gmed muscle activity whencompared within the groups respectively.","PeriodicalId":243536,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electromyographic Analysis of Gluteus Medius Activity in People with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Compared to Healthy Controls\",\"authors\":\"R. Pruthviraj, Baby Lalrinkimi, P. Archana, Sneha Banavara Shyamprasad\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: The functioning of the hip and trunk muscles has an effect on low backregion. Gluteus medius (Gmed) being the primary hip abductor plays a significant role in maintaining thestability of the pelvis. Despite the significance, this muscle activity is least addressed and is also thoughtto be one among the major causes of pain in the low back. The aim of the study was to compare theactivity of Gmed in non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) and healthy individuals using SurfaceElectromyography (SEMG).Methods: 506 subjects were screened, of which 200 subjects were selected. Group A: NSCLBP (n=100)and GROUP B: Healthy controls (n=100). Both groups were instructed to perform maximum voluntarycontractions. The mean root mean square (RMS) value of Gmed muscle activity for the exercise task wasrecorded and analyzed using SEMG.Results: The results demonstrated that the mean RMS value of the right Gmed muscle activity for GROUPA was lesser (53.00 ± 24.81) than GROUP B (87.9 ± 37.47). The mean RMS value of the left Gmed activitywas also lesser for GROUP A (55.99 ± 27.21) compared to GROUP B (89.72 ± 39.83). The difference inmeans between the two groups showed highly significant outcome (P<0.001).Conclusion: The study concluded that the muscle activity of Gmed between the groups was lesser in GroupA compared to Group B indicating differential activation of the muscle in people with NSCLBP. However,there was no significant difference in mean RMS value of the right and left Gmed muscle activity whencompared within the groups respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:髋部和躯干肌肉的功能对下背部有影响。臀中肌(Gmed)是髋关节的主要外展肌,在维持骨盆稳定性方面起着重要作用。尽管具有重要意义,但这种肌肉活动很少得到关注,也被认为是引起腰痛的主要原因之一。该研究的目的是使用表面肌电图(SEMG)比较非特异性慢性腰痛(NSCLBP)和健康人Gmed的活动。方法:筛选506名受试者,从中选择200名。A组:NSCLBP (n=100), B组:健康对照(n=100)。两组都被要求进行最大程度的自主收缩。运动任务时Gmed肌肉活动的均方根(RMS)值被记录下来并使用肌电图进行分析。结果:实验组右侧Gmed肌活动均方根值(53.00±24.81)低于对照组(87.9±37.47)。左侧Gmed活动的平均RMS值A组(55.99±27.21)低于B组(89.72±39.83)。两组间的均数差异显示出高度显著的结果(P<0.001)。结论:研究表明,与B组相比,pa组Gmed的肌肉活性在组间较低,表明NSCLBP患者的肌肉活性存在差异。然而,在组内比较,右、左Gmed肌肉活动的平均均方根值无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electromyographic Analysis of Gluteus Medius Activity in People with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Compared to Healthy Controls
Background and Objectives: The functioning of the hip and trunk muscles has an effect on low backregion. Gluteus medius (Gmed) being the primary hip abductor plays a significant role in maintaining thestability of the pelvis. Despite the significance, this muscle activity is least addressed and is also thoughtto be one among the major causes of pain in the low back. The aim of the study was to compare theactivity of Gmed in non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) and healthy individuals using SurfaceElectromyography (SEMG).Methods: 506 subjects were screened, of which 200 subjects were selected. Group A: NSCLBP (n=100)and GROUP B: Healthy controls (n=100). Both groups were instructed to perform maximum voluntarycontractions. The mean root mean square (RMS) value of Gmed muscle activity for the exercise task wasrecorded and analyzed using SEMG.Results: The results demonstrated that the mean RMS value of the right Gmed muscle activity for GROUPA was lesser (53.00 ± 24.81) than GROUP B (87.9 ± 37.47). The mean RMS value of the left Gmed activitywas also lesser for GROUP A (55.99 ± 27.21) compared to GROUP B (89.72 ± 39.83). The difference inmeans between the two groups showed highly significant outcome (P<0.001).Conclusion: The study concluded that the muscle activity of Gmed between the groups was lesser in GroupA compared to Group B indicating differential activation of the muscle in people with NSCLBP. However,there was no significant difference in mean RMS value of the right and left Gmed muscle activity whencompared within the groups respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Music Therapy and Frenkel Exercise on Reaction Time in Geriatric Population-A Comparative Study Correlation between Postural Stabilty and Functional Disabilty in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Effect of Tilt Table Training on Balance among Subjects with Basal Ganglia Bleed: A Pilot Study Association between Balance Confidence and Cognitive-Motor Interference in Stroke Patients – Pilot Study A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) of Wavelength 905 NM and 808 NM in Management of Chronic Low Back Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1