{"title":"斯拉夫语Topos和斯拉夫语Locus","authors":"Andrey I. Lazarev","doi":"10.31168/0452-7.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the ambiguity of the concepts of topos and locus as rhetorical and literary terms that serve to designate and distinguish the reality created by the text and the reality of the extra-textual space. At the same time, the topos is presented as a common place and as a rhetorical argument in the discussion about the locus of the Slavic ancestral homeland in Slavic linguistics.","PeriodicalId":325863,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Slavic cultural ties. Results and perspectives of research","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slavic Topos and Slavic Locus\",\"authors\":\"Andrey I. Lazarev\",\"doi\":\"10.31168/0452-7.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the ambiguity of the concepts of topos and locus as rhetorical and literary terms that serve to designate and distinguish the reality created by the text and the reality of the extra-textual space. At the same time, the topos is presented as a common place and as a rhetorical argument in the discussion about the locus of the Slavic ancestral homeland in Slavic linguistics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inter-Slavic cultural ties. Results and perspectives of research\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inter-Slavic cultural ties. Results and perspectives of research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31168/0452-7.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Slavic cultural ties. Results and perspectives of research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/0452-7.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The article examines the ambiguity of the concepts of topos and locus as rhetorical and literary terms that serve to designate and distinguish the reality created by the text and the reality of the extra-textual space. At the same time, the topos is presented as a common place and as a rhetorical argument in the discussion about the locus of the Slavic ancestral homeland in Slavic linguistics.