关于创伤的文章的全球评级:GREAT代码的发展,以及与身心健康结果的相关性

Bridget Klest, J. Freyd
{"title":"关于创伤的文章的全球评级:GREAT代码的发展,以及与身心健康结果的相关性","authors":"Bridget Klest, J. Freyd","doi":"10.1300/J513v06n01_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Past research has demonstrated in a variety of contexts that writing about emotional topics can benefit physical health and general well being. Most of this prior research has used the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program (LIWC, Pennebaker & Francis, 1996), but not global essay ratings, to assess what aspects of written essays might be associated with such benefits. Yet scoring rubrics are commonly used in the field of education to score global aspects of student writing. The current study used a sub-sample of essays from a larger research project on trauma, writing and health to develop a global rating rubric for essays about trauma based on rubrics used in education. The resulting rubric was reliably applied to participants' essays about trauma. Global ratings of essay organization were correlated with improvements in physical and mental health measures at a six-month follow-up. Properties of the rubric and correlations with outcome measures are discussed.","PeriodicalId":360233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychological Trauma","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Ratings of Essays About Trauma: Development of the GREAT Code, and Correlations with Physical and Mental Health Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Klest, J. Freyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J513v06n01_01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Past research has demonstrated in a variety of contexts that writing about emotional topics can benefit physical health and general well being. Most of this prior research has used the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program (LIWC, Pennebaker & Francis, 1996), but not global essay ratings, to assess what aspects of written essays might be associated with such benefits. Yet scoring rubrics are commonly used in the field of education to score global aspects of student writing. The current study used a sub-sample of essays from a larger research project on trauma, writing and health to develop a global rating rubric for essays about trauma based on rubrics used in education. The resulting rubric was reliably applied to participants' essays about trauma. Global ratings of essay organization were correlated with improvements in physical and mental health measures at a six-month follow-up. Properties of the rubric and correlations with outcome measures are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychological Trauma\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychological Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J513v06n01_01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychological Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J513v06n01_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

过去的研究已经证明,在各种情况下,写关于情绪的话题可以有益于身体健康和总体幸福感。大多数先前的研究都使用了语言调查和单词计数程序(LIWC, Pennebaker & Francis, 1996),但没有使用全球论文评级来评估书面文章的哪些方面可能与这些好处有关。然而,评分标准通常用于教育领域,对学生写作的整体方面进行评分。目前的研究使用了来自一个关于创伤、写作和健康的大型研究项目的论文的子样本,根据教育中使用的标准,为关于创伤的论文开发了一个全球评级标准。由此产生的标题可靠地应用于参与者关于创伤的文章。在六个月的随访中,论文组织的全球评分与身心健康指标的改善相关。讨论了分类的性质及其与结果度量的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global Ratings of Essays About Trauma: Development of the GREAT Code, and Correlations with Physical and Mental Health Outcomes
ABSTRACT Past research has demonstrated in a variety of contexts that writing about emotional topics can benefit physical health and general well being. Most of this prior research has used the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program (LIWC, Pennebaker & Francis, 1996), but not global essay ratings, to assess what aspects of written essays might be associated with such benefits. Yet scoring rubrics are commonly used in the field of education to score global aspects of student writing. The current study used a sub-sample of essays from a larger research project on trauma, writing and health to develop a global rating rubric for essays about trauma based on rubrics used in education. The resulting rubric was reliably applied to participants' essays about trauma. Global ratings of essay organization were correlated with improvements in physical and mental health measures at a six-month follow-up. Properties of the rubric and correlations with outcome measures are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Operating Characteristics of the PTSD Checklist in Detecting PTSD in HIV+ Substance Abusers Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Emotion Experience in Women: Emotion Occurrence, Intensity, and Variability in the Natural Environment Collaborative Treatment of Traumatized Children and Teens. By Saxe, G. N., Ellis, B. H., & Kaplow, J. B. Conspiracy of Faith: Fighting for Justice After Child Abuse. By Wilmer, G. Examining Children's Fears in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1