用场数22显微镜测定外周血涂片确认血小板计数估计因子

Y. K. A. A. Atmanto, Agus Alim Abdullah, D. Muhadi, M. Arif
{"title":"用场数22显微镜测定外周血涂片确认血小板计数估计因子","authors":"Y. K. A. A. Atmanto, Agus Alim Abdullah, D. Muhadi, M. Arif","doi":"10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The automatic platelet count sometimes requires confirmation on the peripheral blood smear. Platelet count estimation can also be used for reporting platelet count if an automatic cell counter is not available, with an estimation factor according to the Field Number (FN) of the microscope used. This study aimed to determine the platelet count estimation factor based on peripheral blood smear confirmation using an FN 22 microscope. An observational cross-sectional study was carried out in patients who had routine hematological and peripheral blood smear examinations during September 2021 by determination of platelet count using the automatic cell counter method and an average number of platelet counts per field of view with 100x objective magnification. The estimation factor is the total ratio divided by sample size. The total ratio of 254 samples was 4.086. The platelet count estimation factor was 16, indicating that 1 platelet per field of view was equivalent to 16x103/µL. There was a very strong significant correlation between mean platelet count per field of view and platelet count using the automatic cell counter (p<0.001, R>0.750). The field number is the image diameter of the microscope eyepiece. The latest generations of microscope use FN 20 or more, which provides a wider field of view, enabling the observation of more platelets. Factor estimation was used to determine the estimated platelet count on a peripheral blood smear. A big difference between automatic cell counter and peripheral blood smear might indicate pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic errors. The platelet count estimation factor based on peripheral blood smear confirmation using the FN 22 microscope was 16. Each laboratory needs to determine the estimation factor according to the FN microscope used.","PeriodicalId":354500,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Platelet Count Estimation Factor on Peripheral Blood Smear Confirmation Using Field Number 22 Microscope\",\"authors\":\"Y. K. A. A. Atmanto, Agus Alim Abdullah, D. Muhadi, M. Arif\",\"doi\":\"10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The automatic platelet count sometimes requires confirmation on the peripheral blood smear. Platelet count estimation can also be used for reporting platelet count if an automatic cell counter is not available, with an estimation factor according to the Field Number (FN) of the microscope used. This study aimed to determine the platelet count estimation factor based on peripheral blood smear confirmation using an FN 22 microscope. An observational cross-sectional study was carried out in patients who had routine hematological and peripheral blood smear examinations during September 2021 by determination of platelet count using the automatic cell counter method and an average number of platelet counts per field of view with 100x objective magnification. The estimation factor is the total ratio divided by sample size. The total ratio of 254 samples was 4.086. The platelet count estimation factor was 16, indicating that 1 platelet per field of view was equivalent to 16x103/µL. There was a very strong significant correlation between mean platelet count per field of view and platelet count using the automatic cell counter (p<0.001, R>0.750). The field number is the image diameter of the microscope eyepiece. The latest generations of microscope use FN 20 or more, which provides a wider field of view, enabling the observation of more platelets. Factor estimation was used to determine the estimated platelet count on a peripheral blood smear. A big difference between automatic cell counter and peripheral blood smear might indicate pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic errors. The platelet count estimation factor based on peripheral blood smear confirmation using the FN 22 microscope was 16. Each laboratory needs to determine the estimation factor according to the FN microscope used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动血小板计数有时需要外周血涂片确认。如果没有自动细胞计数器,血小板计数估计也可用于报告血小板计数,根据所用显微镜的场数(FN)估算因子。本研究的目的是在fn22显微镜下外周血涂片确认的基础上确定血小板计数的估计因子。对2021年9月进行常规血液学和外周血涂片检查的患者进行观察性横断面研究,采用自动细胞计数法测定血小板计数,并在100倍物镜放大下测定每视场平均血小板计数。估计因子是总比率除以样本量。254个样本的总比值为4.086。血小板计数估计因子为16,即每个视场1个血小板相当于16x103/µL。每个视野的平均血小板计数与使用自动细胞计数器的血小板计数之间存在非常强的显著相关性(p0.750)。视场数是显微镜目镜的像径。最新一代的显微镜使用FN 20或更多,它提供了更广阔的视野,能够观察到更多的血小板。因子估计是用来确定估计血小板计数的外周血涂片。自动细胞计数器和外周血涂片之间的巨大差异可能表明分析前、分析后和分析后的错误。fn22显微镜外周血涂片确认的血小板计数估计因子为16。每个实验室需要根据使用的FN显微镜确定估计因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determination of Platelet Count Estimation Factor on Peripheral Blood Smear Confirmation Using Field Number 22 Microscope
The automatic platelet count sometimes requires confirmation on the peripheral blood smear. Platelet count estimation can also be used for reporting platelet count if an automatic cell counter is not available, with an estimation factor according to the Field Number (FN) of the microscope used. This study aimed to determine the platelet count estimation factor based on peripheral blood smear confirmation using an FN 22 microscope. An observational cross-sectional study was carried out in patients who had routine hematological and peripheral blood smear examinations during September 2021 by determination of platelet count using the automatic cell counter method and an average number of platelet counts per field of view with 100x objective magnification. The estimation factor is the total ratio divided by sample size. The total ratio of 254 samples was 4.086. The platelet count estimation factor was 16, indicating that 1 platelet per field of view was equivalent to 16x103/µL. There was a very strong significant correlation between mean platelet count per field of view and platelet count using the automatic cell counter (p<0.001, R>0.750). The field number is the image diameter of the microscope eyepiece. The latest generations of microscope use FN 20 or more, which provides a wider field of view, enabling the observation of more platelets. Factor estimation was used to determine the estimated platelet count on a peripheral blood smear. A big difference between automatic cell counter and peripheral blood smear might indicate pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic errors. The platelet count estimation factor based on peripheral blood smear confirmation using the FN 22 microscope was 16. Each laboratory needs to determine the estimation factor according to the FN microscope used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Lateral-flow Nanoparticle Fluorescence Assay and ELISA Method for Interferon-y Release Assay Test Correlation between VCAM-1 Level and Absolute Monocyte Count in Coronary Artery Disease Performance Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio Using Meditape UC-11A Strip Test Risk Factors of Fungal Growth in Sputum Culture from Severe and Critical COVID-19 Patients Analysis of Albumin to Globulin Ratio as A Prognostic Predictor in Lupus Nephritis Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1