技术、风险资本和主权财富基金:政府在推动创新和变革中的作用

Javier Capapé, Paul Rose
{"title":"技术、风险资本和主权财富基金:政府在推动创新和变革中的作用","authors":"Javier Capapé, Paul Rose","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3566039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SWFs have pursued VC investments for a variety of reasons, that can be summarized in three main motivations: 1) Strong returns from innovative technologies (disrupting incumbents); 2) Asset class diversification; 3) Diversification of local economies and other positive economic spillovers \n \nThe focus on returns is perhaps most obvious, but also one of the more difficult to achieve. While VC has enjoyed historically high returns, a flood of investors into the space, often driven by a need to overcome low returns in debt assets, risks making the asset class a victim of its own success. While SWFs are eager to invest in venture capital, many SWFs are also recognizing that they must be careful in selecting when and how to invest. The search of stable and durable returns may include hedging against incumbent leaders. When they invest in a unicorn, they also aim to be part of the new economy that will lead the corporate world in the coming decades and back those companies that will amass the industry profits and market share. For example, it is reasonable for a SWF with a strong portfolio exposition to the banking industry to invest also in fintech companies that may disrupt the whole financial sector in the near future. The same logic applies to sectors such as retail, logistics, healthcare, hotel management, or transportation, that are being already disrupted by startups using new technologies, procedures and solutions. SWFs’ interest in VC is not drive solely by returns, however. Venture investing is also part of a broad strategy of diversification. SWFs want to diversify their portfolios to balance and smooth their exposure \nto different asset-classes. \n \nThere is a third reason for SWF interest in VC that is specific to government-owned funds such as SWFs: economic development and the logic of learning how to foster innovation ecosystems. When a pension fund invests in tech-based startups it pursues the first two objectives mentioned above: returns and diversification. Yet, in the case of SWFs, implementing a VC investment program may have a third motivation and benefit: the economic spillovers. \n \nSWFs can use these new technologies developed in their portfolio companies to foster economic \ndevelopment, enhance change, and diversify their economies beyond natural resources into stronger value-added economic sectors. In this way, getting access to the latest technologies would allow developing economies with established SWFs (recall that most of SWFs are located in developing economies) to leapfrog in terms of economic development. SWFs can help to transfer the most advanced technologies used by innovative startups in their portfolios to the rest of the economy, looking for efficiency gains in traditional and new sectors.","PeriodicalId":388027,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Foreign Direct Investment (International) (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology, Venture Capital, and SWFs: The Role of the Government in Forging Innovation and Change\",\"authors\":\"Javier Capapé, Paul Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3566039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SWFs have pursued VC investments for a variety of reasons, that can be summarized in three main motivations: 1) Strong returns from innovative technologies (disrupting incumbents); 2) Asset class diversification; 3) Diversification of local economies and other positive economic spillovers \\n \\nThe focus on returns is perhaps most obvious, but also one of the more difficult to achieve. While VC has enjoyed historically high returns, a flood of investors into the space, often driven by a need to overcome low returns in debt assets, risks making the asset class a victim of its own success. While SWFs are eager to invest in venture capital, many SWFs are also recognizing that they must be careful in selecting when and how to invest. The search of stable and durable returns may include hedging against incumbent leaders. When they invest in a unicorn, they also aim to be part of the new economy that will lead the corporate world in the coming decades and back those companies that will amass the industry profits and market share. For example, it is reasonable for a SWF with a strong portfolio exposition to the banking industry to invest also in fintech companies that may disrupt the whole financial sector in the near future. The same logic applies to sectors such as retail, logistics, healthcare, hotel management, or transportation, that are being already disrupted by startups using new technologies, procedures and solutions. SWFs’ interest in VC is not drive solely by returns, however. Venture investing is also part of a broad strategy of diversification. SWFs want to diversify their portfolios to balance and smooth their exposure \\nto different asset-classes. \\n \\nThere is a third reason for SWF interest in VC that is specific to government-owned funds such as SWFs: economic development and the logic of learning how to foster innovation ecosystems. When a pension fund invests in tech-based startups it pursues the first two objectives mentioned above: returns and diversification. Yet, in the case of SWFs, implementing a VC investment program may have a third motivation and benefit: the economic spillovers. \\n \\nSWFs can use these new technologies developed in their portfolio companies to foster economic \\ndevelopment, enhance change, and diversify their economies beyond natural resources into stronger value-added economic sectors. In this way, getting access to the latest technologies would allow developing economies with established SWFs (recall that most of SWFs are located in developing economies) to leapfrog in terms of economic development. SWFs can help to transfer the most advanced technologies used by innovative startups in their portfolios to the rest of the economy, looking for efficiency gains in traditional and new sectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Foreign Direct Investment (International) (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Foreign Direct Investment (International) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3566039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Foreign Direct Investment (International) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3566039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

主权财富基金寻求风险投资的原因多种多样,可以归纳为三个主要动机:1)创新技术(颠覆现有企业)带来的强劲回报;2)资产类别多元化;对回报的关注可能是最明显的,但也是最难实现的之一。尽管风险投资享有历史上的高回报,但投资者涌入这一领域(往往是出于克服债务资产低回报的需要),有可能使这一资产类别成为自身成功的牺牲品。虽然主权财富基金渴望投资于风险资本,但许多主权财富基金也意识到,它们必须谨慎选择投资的时机和方式。寻求稳定和持久的回报可能包括对冲现任领导人的风险。当他们投资独角兽时,他们也希望成为未来几十年引领企业界的新经济的一部分,并支持那些将积累行业利润和市场份额的公司。例如,对银行业拥有强大投资组合的主权财富基金投资于可能在不久的将来颠覆整个金融行业的金融科技公司是合理的。同样的逻辑也适用于零售、物流、医疗、酒店管理或交通等行业,这些行业已经被初创公司使用新技术、新流程和新解决方案所颠覆。然而,主权财富基金对风险投资的兴趣并非仅仅受回报驱动。风险投资也是多元化战略的一部分。主权财富基金希望使其投资组合多样化,以平衡和平滑其对不同资产类别的敞口。主权财富基金对风险投资感兴趣还有第三个原因,这是主权财富基金等政府拥有的基金所特有的:经济发展和学习如何培育创新生态系统的逻辑。当养老基金投资于科技创业公司时,它追求的是上面提到的前两个目标:回报和多元化。然而,就主权财富基金而言,实施风险投资计划可能有第三个动机和好处:经济溢出效应。主权财富基金可以利用其投资组合公司开发的这些新技术来促进经济发展,促进变革,并使其经济多样化,从自然资源转向更强的增值经济部门。通过这种方式,获得最新技术将使拥有已建立主权财富基金的发展中经济体(请记住,大多数主权财富基金位于发展中经济体)在经济发展方面实现跨越式发展。主权财富基金可以帮助将其投资组合中创新型初创企业使用的最先进技术转移到经济的其他领域,在传统和新兴行业寻求效率提升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technology, Venture Capital, and SWFs: The Role of the Government in Forging Innovation and Change
SWFs have pursued VC investments for a variety of reasons, that can be summarized in three main motivations: 1) Strong returns from innovative technologies (disrupting incumbents); 2) Asset class diversification; 3) Diversification of local economies and other positive economic spillovers The focus on returns is perhaps most obvious, but also one of the more difficult to achieve. While VC has enjoyed historically high returns, a flood of investors into the space, often driven by a need to overcome low returns in debt assets, risks making the asset class a victim of its own success. While SWFs are eager to invest in venture capital, many SWFs are also recognizing that they must be careful in selecting when and how to invest. The search of stable and durable returns may include hedging against incumbent leaders. When they invest in a unicorn, they also aim to be part of the new economy that will lead the corporate world in the coming decades and back those companies that will amass the industry profits and market share. For example, it is reasonable for a SWF with a strong portfolio exposition to the banking industry to invest also in fintech companies that may disrupt the whole financial sector in the near future. The same logic applies to sectors such as retail, logistics, healthcare, hotel management, or transportation, that are being already disrupted by startups using new technologies, procedures and solutions. SWFs’ interest in VC is not drive solely by returns, however. Venture investing is also part of a broad strategy of diversification. SWFs want to diversify their portfolios to balance and smooth their exposure to different asset-classes. There is a third reason for SWF interest in VC that is specific to government-owned funds such as SWFs: economic development and the logic of learning how to foster innovation ecosystems. When a pension fund invests in tech-based startups it pursues the first two objectives mentioned above: returns and diversification. Yet, in the case of SWFs, implementing a VC investment program may have a third motivation and benefit: the economic spillovers. SWFs can use these new technologies developed in their portfolio companies to foster economic development, enhance change, and diversify their economies beyond natural resources into stronger value-added economic sectors. In this way, getting access to the latest technologies would allow developing economies with established SWFs (recall that most of SWFs are located in developing economies) to leapfrog in terms of economic development. SWFs can help to transfer the most advanced technologies used by innovative startups in their portfolios to the rest of the economy, looking for efficiency gains in traditional and new sectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of FDI in a Three Sectors Model Foreign Direct Investments in the German Stock Market From China and the Gulf States Financial Services Trade in Special Economic Zones Foreign Direct Investment: How Has Maldives Fared? Ten Meditations on (Public) Venture Capital – Revisited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1