弥尔顿,薄伽丘和德谟哥根

G. W. Pigman
{"title":"弥尔顿,薄伽丘和德谟哥根","authors":"G. W. Pigman","doi":"10.1093/res/hgad051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n For years scholars have realized that Demogorgon owes his existence to a misreading of demiurgus in a commentary on Statius’ Thebaid and that Boccaccio’s Genealogy of the Pagan Gods was the most important text for establishing Demogorgon as the ancestor of the gods for the Renaissance. But the extent of scepticism about Demogorgon in Milton’s day is not widely known. In an early example of the polemical imitation that characterizes much of his mature poetry, Milton indicates his own scepticism in Prolusion I by extensively correcting Boccaccio’s account of Demogorgon and his progeny. Unlike his frighteningly powerful namesake in Boiardo, Ariosto, and Spenser, the Demogorgon of Paradise Lost is simply one member of the court of Chaos. The multivalent periphrasis—‘the dreaded name $|$ Of Demogorgon’—suggests that Boccaccio’s ancestor of the gods is nothing more than a name.","PeriodicalId":255318,"journal":{"name":"The Review of English Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Milton, Boccaccio, and Demogorgon\",\"authors\":\"G. W. Pigman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/res/hgad051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n For years scholars have realized that Demogorgon owes his existence to a misreading of demiurgus in a commentary on Statius’ Thebaid and that Boccaccio’s Genealogy of the Pagan Gods was the most important text for establishing Demogorgon as the ancestor of the gods for the Renaissance. But the extent of scepticism about Demogorgon in Milton’s day is not widely known. In an early example of the polemical imitation that characterizes much of his mature poetry, Milton indicates his own scepticism in Prolusion I by extensively correcting Boccaccio’s account of Demogorgon and his progeny. Unlike his frighteningly powerful namesake in Boiardo, Ariosto, and Spenser, the Demogorgon of Paradise Lost is simply one member of the court of Chaos. The multivalent periphrasis—‘the dreaded name $|$ Of Demogorgon’—suggests that Boccaccio’s ancestor of the gods is nothing more than a name.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Review of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Review of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgad051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Review of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgad051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,学者们已经意识到,德莫戈贡的存在应该归功于对斯塔提乌斯的《底比德》的评论中对半米古斯的误读,而卜伽丘的《异教众神谱系》是确立德莫戈贡为文艺复兴时期众神祖先的最重要的文本。但在弥尔顿的时代,人们对德谟哥哥根的怀疑程度并不广为人知。在早期的一个例子中,辩论式的模仿是他成熟诗歌的特征,弥尔顿在序言一中,通过广泛地纠正薄伽丘对德谟哥根及其后代的描述,表明了他自己的怀疑。与《波亚多、阿里奥斯托和斯宾塞》中与他有着可怕权力的同名人物不同,《失乐园》中的德莫戈贡只是混乱法庭的一员。“德莫戈贡的可怕名字”这一多重迂回措辞暗示薄伽丘的众神祖先只不过是一个名字而已。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Milton, Boccaccio, and Demogorgon
For years scholars have realized that Demogorgon owes his existence to a misreading of demiurgus in a commentary on Statius’ Thebaid and that Boccaccio’s Genealogy of the Pagan Gods was the most important text for establishing Demogorgon as the ancestor of the gods for the Renaissance. But the extent of scepticism about Demogorgon in Milton’s day is not widely known. In an early example of the polemical imitation that characterizes much of his mature poetry, Milton indicates his own scepticism in Prolusion I by extensively correcting Boccaccio’s account of Demogorgon and his progeny. Unlike his frighteningly powerful namesake in Boiardo, Ariosto, and Spenser, the Demogorgon of Paradise Lost is simply one member of the court of Chaos. The multivalent periphrasis—‘the dreaded name $|$ Of Demogorgon’—suggests that Boccaccio’s ancestor of the gods is nothing more than a name.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nicholas Seager (ed.). The Cambridge Edition of the Correspondence of Daniel Defoe Nils-Lennart Johannesson and Andrew Cooper (eds). Ormulum, edited from Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Junius 1 and London, Lambeth Palace Library, MS 783 ‘Sacred to the Memory’: Thomas Hardy’s Tombstones Keats’s Unwritten Epic Boundaries and Disgust in The Duchess of Malfi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1