最大化国际人权诉讼工具:共识的作用

Francisco Pascual-Vives
{"title":"最大化国际人权诉讼工具:共识的作用","authors":"Francisco Pascual-Vives","doi":"10.25267/paix_secur_int.2021.i9.1202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amongst the instruments making up the strategies for international human rights litigation, the notion of consensus constitutes a tool that is made available to the disputing parties by public international law. When expertly used, consensus can be quite useful to those invoking an evolutive interpretation and wishing to increase the scope of the rights protected by an international human rights treaty, as well as to those wishing to justify the necessity and the proportionality of the restrictions upon a right. This paper offers some recommendations to those practitioners seeking to invoke the notion of consensus in international human rights litigation through a systematisation of the practice before the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.","PeriodicalId":333001,"journal":{"name":"Paix et Securite Internationales","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximizing the International Human Rights Litigation Toolkit: the Role of Consensus\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Pascual-Vives\",\"doi\":\"10.25267/paix_secur_int.2021.i9.1202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Amongst the instruments making up the strategies for international human rights litigation, the notion of consensus constitutes a tool that is made available to the disputing parties by public international law. When expertly used, consensus can be quite useful to those invoking an evolutive interpretation and wishing to increase the scope of the rights protected by an international human rights treaty, as well as to those wishing to justify the necessity and the proportionality of the restrictions upon a right. This paper offers some recommendations to those practitioners seeking to invoke the notion of consensus in international human rights litigation through a systematisation of the practice before the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paix et Securite Internationales\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paix et Securite Internationales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25267/paix_secur_int.2021.i9.1202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paix et Securite Internationales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25267/paix_secur_int.2021.i9.1202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在构成国际人权诉讼战略的各种文书中,协商一致意见的概念是国际公法提供给争端各方的一种工具。如果使用得当,协商一致意见对于那些援引一种渐进的解释并希望扩大一项国际人权条约所保护的权利的范围的人,以及那些希望证明限制一项权利的必要性和相称性的人,是非常有用的。本文向那些试图通过将欧洲人权法院和美洲人权法院的做法系统化,在国际人权诉讼中援引协商一致概念的从业人员提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maximizing the International Human Rights Litigation Toolkit: the Role of Consensus
Amongst the instruments making up the strategies for international human rights litigation, the notion of consensus constitutes a tool that is made available to the disputing parties by public international law. When expertly used, consensus can be quite useful to those invoking an evolutive interpretation and wishing to increase the scope of the rights protected by an international human rights treaty, as well as to those wishing to justify the necessity and the proportionality of the restrictions upon a right. This paper offers some recommendations to those practitioners seeking to invoke the notion of consensus in international human rights litigation through a systematisation of the practice before the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Externalization of Europe’s Data Protection Law in Morocco: an Imperative Means for the Management of Migration Flows The Control of Migration Flows in the Central Mediterranean Sea: Insights from Recent Italian Practice Le statut juridique des étrangers dans l’Union européenne: Le cas des ressortissants camerounais The European Union Fight against Trafficking of Human Beings: Challenges of the Victim’s Statute The European Union-Turkey Cooperation on Migration matters: Towards a Review of the Migratory Statement of 18 march 2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1