一次或多次矫形?概念化、评价与社会问题:文献综述

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychologie Francaise Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1016/j.psfr.2022.04.005
E. Hanras , G. Dorard , E. Boujut
{"title":"一次或多次矫形?概念化、评价与社会问题:文献综述","authors":"E. Hanras ,&nbsp;G. Dorard ,&nbsp;E. Boujut","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2022.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the interest in the quality of food is getting increasingly widespread in our society. From now on, consumers are paying more attention to food components and are trying to adopt a more environmentally friendly by consuming, for example, products from short circuits. However, this attention to the quality of food can be pathological. The neologism <em>orthorexia nervosa</em>, invented in 1997, describes this obsessive relationship with food. People with orthorexia develop obsessions related to food quality and may develop eating rituals in order to stay “healthy”. Orthorexia nervosa is not yet considered a psychiatric disorder due to a lack of consensus on its definition, but it is associated with impaired somatic, social, professional and/or academic functioning. Indeed, although orthorexia nervosa has been the subject of increasing scientific interest, it remains poorly understood because the main tools used to assess it offer a partial measure of the concept. For example, the “ORTHO” self-questionnaire, which is the most widely used in the scientific literature, assesses an interest in healthy eating rather than psychopathological obsessions. The current data and knowledge on orthorexia nervosa are therefore uncertain, making it difficult to understand this concept. In order to better understand the issues at stake in the assessment of orthorexia nervosa, a critical reading of these tools is proposed in this article. Moreover, a new conceptualization of orthorexia emerged a few years ago. It offers a better understanding of this concept with a healthy side (i.e., healthy orthorexia) and a pathological side (i.e., orthorexia nervosa). In an attempt to clarify the knowledge on orthorexia, the main objective of this critical review of the literature is to present orthorexia nervosa according to its initial conceptualization and its current understanding in accordance with scientific advances. The second objective is to distinguish orthorexia nervosa from anorexia nervosa. The third objective is to highlight the emergence of a growing, and sometimes pathological, interest in healthy eating within the context of societal development. To achieve these objectives, a review of the literature on orthorexia and healthy eating was conducted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"68 4","pages":"Pages 559-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Une ou plusieurs orthorexies ? Conceptualisation, évaluation et enjeux sociétaux : une revue critique de la littérature\",\"authors\":\"E. Hanras ,&nbsp;G. Dorard ,&nbsp;E. Boujut\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psfr.2022.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In recent years, the interest in the quality of food is getting increasingly widespread in our society. From now on, consumers are paying more attention to food components and are trying to adopt a more environmentally friendly by consuming, for example, products from short circuits. However, this attention to the quality of food can be pathological. The neologism <em>orthorexia nervosa</em>, invented in 1997, describes this obsessive relationship with food. People with orthorexia develop obsessions related to food quality and may develop eating rituals in order to stay “healthy”. Orthorexia nervosa is not yet considered a psychiatric disorder due to a lack of consensus on its definition, but it is associated with impaired somatic, social, professional and/or academic functioning. Indeed, although orthorexia nervosa has been the subject of increasing scientific interest, it remains poorly understood because the main tools used to assess it offer a partial measure of the concept. For example, the “ORTHO” self-questionnaire, which is the most widely used in the scientific literature, assesses an interest in healthy eating rather than psychopathological obsessions. The current data and knowledge on orthorexia nervosa are therefore uncertain, making it difficult to understand this concept. In order to better understand the issues at stake in the assessment of orthorexia nervosa, a critical reading of these tools is proposed in this article. Moreover, a new conceptualization of orthorexia emerged a few years ago. It offers a better understanding of this concept with a healthy side (i.e., healthy orthorexia) and a pathological side (i.e., orthorexia nervosa). In an attempt to clarify the knowledge on orthorexia, the main objective of this critical review of the literature is to present orthorexia nervosa according to its initial conceptualization and its current understanding in accordance with scientific advances. The second objective is to distinguish orthorexia nervosa from anorexia nervosa. The third objective is to highlight the emergence of a growing, and sometimes pathological, interest in healthy eating within the context of societal development. To achieve these objectives, a review of the literature on orthorexia and healthy eating was conducted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 559-578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298422000310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298422000310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,对食品质量的兴趣在我们的社会中越来越普遍。从现在开始,消费者越来越关注食品成分,并试图通过消费更环保的产品,例如短路产品。然而,这种对食物质量的关注可能是病态的。1997年发明的新词“神经性厌食症”(orthorexia nervosa)描述了这种对食物的痴迷。患有厌食症的人会对食物质量产生痴迷,并可能为了保持“健康”而养成饮食习惯。由于缺乏对其定义的共识,神经性厌食症尚未被认为是一种精神疾病,但它与身体、社会、专业和/或学术功能受损有关。的确,尽管神经性正食症已经成为越来越多的科学兴趣的主题,但人们对它的了解仍然很少,因为用于评估它的主要工具只能部分地衡量这个概念。例如,在科学文献中使用最广泛的“ORTHO”自我调查问卷,评估的是对健康饮食的兴趣,而不是精神病理上的痴迷。因此,目前关于神经性厌食症的数据和知识是不确定的,因此很难理解这一概念。为了更好地理解在神经性厌食症评估中所面临的问题,本文建议对这些工具进行批判性阅读。此外,几年前出现了一种新的“正食症”概念。它提供了一个更好的理解这一概念与健康的一面(即,健康的正食)和病理的一面(即,神经性正食)。为了澄清关于正食症的知识,本文的主要目的是对文献进行批判性回顾,根据其最初的概念和根据科学进展对其目前的理解来呈现神经性正食症。第二个目的是区分神经性厌食症和神经性厌食症。第三个目标是强调在社会发展的背景下,对健康饮食日益增长的,有时是病态的兴趣的出现。为了达到这些目标,我们回顾了关于正常饮食和健康饮食的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Une ou plusieurs orthorexies ? Conceptualisation, évaluation et enjeux sociétaux : une revue critique de la littérature

In recent years, the interest in the quality of food is getting increasingly widespread in our society. From now on, consumers are paying more attention to food components and are trying to adopt a more environmentally friendly by consuming, for example, products from short circuits. However, this attention to the quality of food can be pathological. The neologism orthorexia nervosa, invented in 1997, describes this obsessive relationship with food. People with orthorexia develop obsessions related to food quality and may develop eating rituals in order to stay “healthy”. Orthorexia nervosa is not yet considered a psychiatric disorder due to a lack of consensus on its definition, but it is associated with impaired somatic, social, professional and/or academic functioning. Indeed, although orthorexia nervosa has been the subject of increasing scientific interest, it remains poorly understood because the main tools used to assess it offer a partial measure of the concept. For example, the “ORTHO” self-questionnaire, which is the most widely used in the scientific literature, assesses an interest in healthy eating rather than psychopathological obsessions. The current data and knowledge on orthorexia nervosa are therefore uncertain, making it difficult to understand this concept. In order to better understand the issues at stake in the assessment of orthorexia nervosa, a critical reading of these tools is proposed in this article. Moreover, a new conceptualization of orthorexia emerged a few years ago. It offers a better understanding of this concept with a healthy side (i.e., healthy orthorexia) and a pathological side (i.e., orthorexia nervosa). In an attempt to clarify the knowledge on orthorexia, the main objective of this critical review of the literature is to present orthorexia nervosa according to its initial conceptualization and its current understanding in accordance with scientific advances. The second objective is to distinguish orthorexia nervosa from anorexia nervosa. The third objective is to highlight the emergence of a growing, and sometimes pathological, interest in healthy eating within the context of societal development. To achieve these objectives, a review of the literature on orthorexia and healthy eating was conducted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Influence of sex on judgments of an aggressive North African woman Quelle formation des savoirs sur le cancer et la chimiothérapie orale en contexte d’ETP ? Apports d’une approche psychosociale articulée à un dispositif de triangulation méthodologique Étude exploratoire de profils d’enseignants à risque de burnout : association avec les processus de coping et le sentiment d’auto-efficacité Adaptation française et propriétés psychométriques de l’échelle d’utilisabilité perçue des sites web « Design-oriented evaluation of perceived usability (DEEP) »
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1