猪产品争端解决:以欧洲和俄罗斯贸易为例

R. Hendrawan, J. A. Purnomo, Firman Rosdjadi Djoemadi, A. Pratono, Taufik Iman Santoso
{"title":"猪产品争端解决:以欧洲和俄罗斯贸易为例","authors":"R. Hendrawan, J. A. Purnomo, Firman Rosdjadi Djoemadi, A. Pratono, Taufik Iman Santoso","doi":"10.2991/SORES-18.2019.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to discuss how WTO dispute settlement system address the case number DS475 Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union. Adopting the content analysis method, the authors stand for the European Union where it is thought that the policy of Russia applying the import ban on pork products of EU is such a blunder and might not bring benefit at all for both parties. The findings indicate that the embargo policy to Russia could generate a negative impact on the EU countries, especially for those who become key players in the industry. Keywords—dispute settlement; banned import; live pigs; pig","PeriodicalId":184791,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2018)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dispute Settlement on Pig Products: Case study of European and Russian trade\",\"authors\":\"R. Hendrawan, J. A. Purnomo, Firman Rosdjadi Djoemadi, A. Pratono, Taufik Iman Santoso\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/SORES-18.2019.140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article attempts to discuss how WTO dispute settlement system address the case number DS475 Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union. Adopting the content analysis method, the authors stand for the European Union where it is thought that the policy of Russia applying the import ban on pork products of EU is such a blunder and might not bring benefit at all for both parties. The findings indicate that the embargo policy to Russia could generate a negative impact on the EU countries, especially for those who become key players in the industry. Keywords—dispute settlement; banned import; live pigs; pig\",\"PeriodicalId\":184791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2018)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/SORES-18.2019.140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/SORES-18.2019.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图探讨WTO争端解决机制如何处理DS475号案件“关于从欧盟进口生猪、猪肉和其他猪产品的措施”。采用内容分析法,作者站在欧盟的立场,认为俄罗斯对欧盟猪肉产品实施进口禁令的政策是一个错误,可能对双方都没有好处。调查结果表明,对俄罗斯的禁运政策可能对欧盟国家产生负面影响,特别是对那些成为该行业关键参与者的国家。Keywords-dispute结算;禁止进口;生猪;猪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dispute Settlement on Pig Products: Case study of European and Russian trade
This article attempts to discuss how WTO dispute settlement system address the case number DS475 Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union. Adopting the content analysis method, the authors stand for the European Union where it is thought that the policy of Russia applying the import ban on pork products of EU is such a blunder and might not bring benefit at all for both parties. The findings indicate that the embargo policy to Russia could generate a negative impact on the EU countries, especially for those who become key players in the industry. Keywords—dispute settlement; banned import; live pigs; pig
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communication in Family Resilience The Influence of Quality of Management Accounting Information System on the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance and It Impacts on the Company Performance Application of the Ijarah Contract on Educational Financing through Empowerment of Laboratory of Mini Sharia Bank in Higher Education Migration and Development: A case study of Indonesian migrant workers Reconstructing Clean Water Policy Based on the Perspective of Idea Law of Pancasila the Indonesia’s Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1