设计煤炭地区的可持续变化

Antje Matern, Agnes Förster, Robert Knippschild
{"title":"设计煤炭地区的可持续变化","authors":"Antje Matern, Agnes Förster, Robert Knippschild","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2158588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In conjunction with the energy transition and decarbonisation, coal-mining regions in particular are facing enormous dynamics of change. Despite immense challenges, they can become model and showcase regions for the great transformation toward sustainability. But is this assumption correct? And how can the current and upcoming processes in the affected regions be designed in such a way that they are purposefully directed toward sustainability? Regions that need to organise the phase-out of lignite open-cast mining are contributing to the achievement of national and international goals for the reduction of greenhouse gases. This self-designed structural change on the local and regional levels is part of an overarching transformation strategy on higher levels of scale. Nevertheless, the structural change associated with the coal phase-out and the great transformation toward sustainability are different concerns – with different motivations and dynamics. Structural change is a process of socio-economic change, usually perceived as a crisis, due to changes in external conditions. To cushion the socioeconomic consequences in particular, structural policy rescue packages and aid programmes are launched. Transformation toward sustainability is understood as a desired path and system shift to bring about deliberate change. This raises the question of whether and under what conditions it is possible to attach a normative ambition to unavoidable processes of change in regions that do not tend to have favourable conditions for transformation. In coal regions in particular, one can assume a lack of openness among actors and the local population, as they have fears about job losses and living conditions. Furthermore, coal, energy and related industries tend to be organised centrally and hierarchically with a low diversity of sectors and thus must overcome gridlocked structures and lock-in effects. At the same time, a forward-looking structural policy adapted to regional sensitivities can provide resources and build capacities to embark on new paths in the affected regions. However, what stimulus for transformation can be created where, and by whom? Should these stimuli come from outside or within? And in general, how can transformation in coal regions be initiated, coordinated and stabilised? With this special issue, we are particularly interested in the role of space when addressing the questions above. What is the relationship between different fields of transformation and spatial challenges as well as resources within these regions? Transformative approaches are often sector-oriented with little reference to space. Therefore, the spatial dimension is often neglected – both in research and policy-making. However, we assume that spatial thinking and strategy-making are key to the transformation of coal regions. Neighbourhoods, industrial areas, cities, and productive landscapes are ‘landing places’ for innovation. Space exerts an integrative momentum for the range of technological and societal initiatives that are urgently needed to address structural change. Furthermore, quality of life is closely linked to the quality of regions, which are required to embed themselves closely in regional networks and Professor Antje Matern is a Professor of Regional Development at the University of Applied Sciences Erfurt. She worked as a senior researcher in the BMBF project for scientific support of the transformation process in Lusatia at the Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development. Her research focuses on the sustainable transformation of cities and regions and the role of spatial planning in the governance of transformation processes.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Sustainable Change in Coal Regions\",\"authors\":\"Antje Matern, Agnes Förster, Robert Knippschild\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02513625.2022.2158588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In conjunction with the energy transition and decarbonisation, coal-mining regions in particular are facing enormous dynamics of change. Despite immense challenges, they can become model and showcase regions for the great transformation toward sustainability. But is this assumption correct? And how can the current and upcoming processes in the affected regions be designed in such a way that they are purposefully directed toward sustainability? Regions that need to organise the phase-out of lignite open-cast mining are contributing to the achievement of national and international goals for the reduction of greenhouse gases. This self-designed structural change on the local and regional levels is part of an overarching transformation strategy on higher levels of scale. Nevertheless, the structural change associated with the coal phase-out and the great transformation toward sustainability are different concerns – with different motivations and dynamics. Structural change is a process of socio-economic change, usually perceived as a crisis, due to changes in external conditions. To cushion the socioeconomic consequences in particular, structural policy rescue packages and aid programmes are launched. Transformation toward sustainability is understood as a desired path and system shift to bring about deliberate change. This raises the question of whether and under what conditions it is possible to attach a normative ambition to unavoidable processes of change in regions that do not tend to have favourable conditions for transformation. In coal regions in particular, one can assume a lack of openness among actors and the local population, as they have fears about job losses and living conditions. Furthermore, coal, energy and related industries tend to be organised centrally and hierarchically with a low diversity of sectors and thus must overcome gridlocked structures and lock-in effects. At the same time, a forward-looking structural policy adapted to regional sensitivities can provide resources and build capacities to embark on new paths in the affected regions. However, what stimulus for transformation can be created where, and by whom? Should these stimuli come from outside or within? And in general, how can transformation in coal regions be initiated, coordinated and stabilised? With this special issue, we are particularly interested in the role of space when addressing the questions above. What is the relationship between different fields of transformation and spatial challenges as well as resources within these regions? Transformative approaches are often sector-oriented with little reference to space. Therefore, the spatial dimension is often neglected – both in research and policy-making. However, we assume that spatial thinking and strategy-making are key to the transformation of coal regions. Neighbourhoods, industrial areas, cities, and productive landscapes are ‘landing places’ for innovation. Space exerts an integrative momentum for the range of technological and societal initiatives that are urgently needed to address structural change. Furthermore, quality of life is closely linked to the quality of regions, which are required to embed themselves closely in regional networks and Professor Antje Matern is a Professor of Regional Development at the University of Applied Sciences Erfurt. She worked as a senior researcher in the BMBF project for scientific support of the transformation process in Lusatia at the Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development. Her research focuses on the sustainable transformation of cities and regions and the role of spatial planning in the governance of transformation processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"disP - The Planning Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"disP - The Planning Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2158588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2158588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着能源转型和脱碳,特别是煤矿地区正面临着巨大的变化。尽管面临着巨大的挑战,但它们可以成为向可持续发展转变的典范和展示区域。但这种假设正确吗?如何设计受影响地区当前和未来的进程,使其有目的地朝着可持续发展方向发展?需要组织逐步淘汰褐煤露天开采的地区正在为实现减少温室气体的国家和国际目标作出贡献。这种在地方和区域层面上的自我设计的结构变化是在更高层次上的总体转型战略的一部分。然而,与淘汰煤炭有关的结构变化和向可持续发展的巨大转变是不同的问题- -具有不同的动机和动力。结构变化是由于外部条件的变化而引起的社会经济变化过程,通常被视为危机。特别是为了缓解社会经济后果,各国启动了结构性政策救援计划和援助计划。向可持续发展的转变被理解为一种理想的路径和系统转变,以带来深思熟虑的变化。这就提出了一个问题,即在不具备有利改革条件的区域,是否以及在什么条件下,有可能对不可避免的变革进程附加规范的雄心。特别是在煤炭地区,人们可以假设演员和当地居民缺乏公开性,因为他们担心失业和生活条件。此外,煤炭、能源和相关产业往往是集中组织的,等级森严,部门多样性低,因此必须克服结构僵化和锁定效应。与此同时,适应区域敏感性的前瞻性结构政策可以提供资源和建设能力,以便在受影响区域走上新的道路。然而,什么样的变革刺激可以在哪里,由谁来创造?这些刺激应该来自外部还是内部?总的来说,如何启动、协调和稳定煤炭地区的转型?在本期特刊中,我们对空间在解决上述问题时所起的作用特别感兴趣。不同的转型领域与这些区域内的空间挑战以及资源之间的关系是什么?变革的方法往往以部门为导向,很少涉及空间。因此,在研究和决策中,空间维度经常被忽视。然而,我们认为空间思维和战略决策是煤炭区域转型的关键。社区、工业区、城市和生产性景观都是创新的“着陆点”。空间为解决结构变化所迫切需要的一系列技术和社会举措提供了一种综合动力。此外,生活质量与区域质量密切相关,区域质量需要紧密嵌入区域网络,Antje Matern教授是埃尔福特应用科学大学的区域发展教授。她曾在莱布尼茨生态城市和区域发展研究所担任BMBF项目的高级研究员,为卢萨蒂亚的转型过程提供科学支持。她的研究重点是城市和地区的可持续转型以及空间规划在转型过程治理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing Sustainable Change in Coal Regions
In conjunction with the energy transition and decarbonisation, coal-mining regions in particular are facing enormous dynamics of change. Despite immense challenges, they can become model and showcase regions for the great transformation toward sustainability. But is this assumption correct? And how can the current and upcoming processes in the affected regions be designed in such a way that they are purposefully directed toward sustainability? Regions that need to organise the phase-out of lignite open-cast mining are contributing to the achievement of national and international goals for the reduction of greenhouse gases. This self-designed structural change on the local and regional levels is part of an overarching transformation strategy on higher levels of scale. Nevertheless, the structural change associated with the coal phase-out and the great transformation toward sustainability are different concerns – with different motivations and dynamics. Structural change is a process of socio-economic change, usually perceived as a crisis, due to changes in external conditions. To cushion the socioeconomic consequences in particular, structural policy rescue packages and aid programmes are launched. Transformation toward sustainability is understood as a desired path and system shift to bring about deliberate change. This raises the question of whether and under what conditions it is possible to attach a normative ambition to unavoidable processes of change in regions that do not tend to have favourable conditions for transformation. In coal regions in particular, one can assume a lack of openness among actors and the local population, as they have fears about job losses and living conditions. Furthermore, coal, energy and related industries tend to be organised centrally and hierarchically with a low diversity of sectors and thus must overcome gridlocked structures and lock-in effects. At the same time, a forward-looking structural policy adapted to regional sensitivities can provide resources and build capacities to embark on new paths in the affected regions. However, what stimulus for transformation can be created where, and by whom? Should these stimuli come from outside or within? And in general, how can transformation in coal regions be initiated, coordinated and stabilised? With this special issue, we are particularly interested in the role of space when addressing the questions above. What is the relationship between different fields of transformation and spatial challenges as well as resources within these regions? Transformative approaches are often sector-oriented with little reference to space. Therefore, the spatial dimension is often neglected – both in research and policy-making. However, we assume that spatial thinking and strategy-making are key to the transformation of coal regions. Neighbourhoods, industrial areas, cities, and productive landscapes are ‘landing places’ for innovation. Space exerts an integrative momentum for the range of technological and societal initiatives that are urgently needed to address structural change. Furthermore, quality of life is closely linked to the quality of regions, which are required to embed themselves closely in regional networks and Professor Antje Matern is a Professor of Regional Development at the University of Applied Sciences Erfurt. She worked as a senior researcher in the BMBF project for scientific support of the transformation process in Lusatia at the Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development. Her research focuses on the sustainable transformation of cities and regions and the role of spatial planning in the governance of transformation processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Karl Ganser. Integratives Planen und Handeln Leadership – collectively oriented: Insights from trajectories of temporary urbanism Die Bereitstellung von leistbarem Wohnraum in Zeiten der Wohnkrise Breaking out of the box – towards functional spatial planning Bucharest – the role of spatial planning in a challenging urban environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1