在设计过程中对CSCW的工业和教育用途进行评估和比较

A. Thomson, S. MacGregor, W. Ion
{"title":"在设计过程中对CSCW的工业和教育用途进行评估和比较","authors":"A. Thomson, S. MacGregor, W. Ion","doi":"10.1109/ENABL.2000.883713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the findings of three recent research projects carried out at the University of Strathclyde. Two of the projects, ICON (Institutional Collaboration Over Networks) and ICON2 investigated the usage of CSCW tools by disparate engineering design students whilst, a Design Council funded research project investigated the introduction and usage of shared workspace technology within the design process of three companies and their supply chain. This is followed by a comparative reflection of the results allowing identification of generic findings together with opportunities for cross-sectoral lessons.","PeriodicalId":435283,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation and comparison of the industrial and educational usage of CSCW within the design process\",\"authors\":\"A. Thomson, S. MacGregor, W. Ion\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ENABL.2000.883713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the findings of three recent research projects carried out at the University of Strathclyde. Two of the projects, ICON (Institutional Collaboration Over Networks) and ICON2 investigated the usage of CSCW tools by disparate engineering design students whilst, a Design Council funded research project investigated the introduction and usage of shared workspace technology within the design process of three companies and their supply chain. This is followed by a comparative reflection of the results allowing identification of generic findings together with opportunities for cross-sectoral lessons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2000.883713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2000.883713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了最近在斯特拉斯克莱德大学进行的三个研究项目的结果。其中两个项目,ICON(机构网络协作)和ICON2调查了不同工程设计专业学生对CSCW工具的使用情况,同时,一个设计委员会资助的研究项目调查了三家公司及其供应链设计过程中共享工作空间技术的引入和使用情况。然后对结果进行比较反映,从而确定一般性的发现,并有机会吸取跨部门的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation and comparison of the industrial and educational usage of CSCW within the design process
This paper presents the findings of three recent research projects carried out at the University of Strathclyde. Two of the projects, ICON (Institutional Collaboration Over Networks) and ICON2 investigated the usage of CSCW tools by disparate engineering design students whilst, a Design Council funded research project investigated the introduction and usage of shared workspace technology within the design process of three companies and their supply chain. This is followed by a comparative reflection of the results allowing identification of generic findings together with opportunities for cross-sectoral lessons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Techniques for evaluating collaboration toolkits Tapping alert protocol ETOILE - an Environment for Team, Organizational and Individual Learning in Emergencies Secure multicast software delivery Developing and evaluating collaborative engineering studios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1