评估无机械肠道准备的结直肠手术的安全性

Dr. Md. Azizul Islam, Dr. Md. Ashraful Alom, Dr. Md. Jamal E Rabby, Dr. Md. Sofikul Islam, Dr. Md. Zahidul Islam
{"title":"评估无机械肠道准备的结直肠手术的安全性","authors":"Dr. Md. Azizul Islam, Dr. Md. Ashraful Alom, Dr. Md. Jamal E Rabby, Dr. Md. Sofikul Islam, Dr. Md. Zahidul Islam","doi":"10.36349/easjms.2022.v04i10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) for elective available colorectal surgical procedure has been practiced as a clinical routine for many decades. However, earlier randomized medical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses endorse that MBP ought to be deserted earlier than colorectal surgical treatment due to the fact of the futility in decreasing postoperative problems and motility. The new published outcomes from three RCTs evaluating MBP with no MBP in colorectal surgical treatment in 2010 make the updating of systemic overview and meta-analysis necessary. Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the safety of colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. Methods: This is an observational study. The study used to be carried out in the admitted patient’s Department of Surgery Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. In Bangladesh for the duration of the period from June 2014 to May 2015. Results: This study shows that the according to age of 80 patients aged 20-above 51 years where, 4(10%) were 20-30 years, 10(25%) were 31-41 years, 10(25%) were 41-50 years, 16(40%) were 51 and above years in Group A, and 6(15%) were 20-30 years, 6(15%) were 31-40 years, 13(32.5%) were 41-50 years and 15(37.5%) were 51 and above years in Group B. And 28(70%) were males and 12(30%) were females in group A. And 27(67.5%) were males and 13(32.5%) were females in group B. Conclusions: Mechanical bowel preparation before elective colon and rectal surgery cannot prevent complications like anastomotic leakage, wound infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, abdominal abscess and extra abdominal complications.","PeriodicalId":446681,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assess the Safety of Colorectal Surgery without Mechanical Bowel Preparation\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Md. Azizul Islam, Dr. Md. Ashraful Alom, Dr. Md. Jamal E Rabby, Dr. Md. Sofikul Islam, Dr. Md. Zahidul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.36349/easjms.2022.v04i10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) for elective available colorectal surgical procedure has been practiced as a clinical routine for many decades. However, earlier randomized medical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses endorse that MBP ought to be deserted earlier than colorectal surgical treatment due to the fact of the futility in decreasing postoperative problems and motility. The new published outcomes from three RCTs evaluating MBP with no MBP in colorectal surgical treatment in 2010 make the updating of systemic overview and meta-analysis necessary. Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the safety of colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. Methods: This is an observational study. The study used to be carried out in the admitted patient’s Department of Surgery Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. In Bangladesh for the duration of the period from June 2014 to May 2015. Results: This study shows that the according to age of 80 patients aged 20-above 51 years where, 4(10%) were 20-30 years, 10(25%) were 31-41 years, 10(25%) were 41-50 years, 16(40%) were 51 and above years in Group A, and 6(15%) were 20-30 years, 6(15%) were 31-40 years, 13(32.5%) were 41-50 years and 15(37.5%) were 51 and above years in Group B. And 28(70%) were males and 12(30%) were females in group A. And 27(67.5%) were males and 13(32.5%) were females in group B. Conclusions: Mechanical bowel preparation before elective colon and rectal surgery cannot prevent complications like anastomotic leakage, wound infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, abdominal abscess and extra abdominal complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjms.2022.v04i10.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjms.2022.v04i10.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机械肠道准备(MBP)作为可选结肠直肠外科手术的临床常规已经实践了几十年。然而,早期的随机医学试验(rct)和荟萃分析支持MBP应该比结肠直肠手术治疗更早放弃,因为它在减少术后问题和运动方面是无效的。2010年发表的三项评估MBP与无MBP在结直肠手术治疗中的随机对照试验的新结果使得更新系统综述和荟萃分析成为必要。目的:本研究的目的是评估无机械肠道准备的结直肠手术的安全性。方法:观察性研究。该研究过去是在孟加拉国拉杰沙希拉杰沙希医学院医院住院病人的外科进行的。于2014年6月至2015年5月期间在孟加拉国。结果:本研究显示,根据80岁病人20-above 51岁,4(10%)20 - 30年,10(25%)31-41年,10(25%)每周年,16(40%)在A组51岁以上的年,和6(15%)20 - 30年,6(15%)31-40年,13(32.5%)每周51年,15(37.5%)及以上年组b和28(70%)是男性和12(30%)是女性在A组27例(67.5%)是男性和13(32.5%)是女性在b组的结论:择期结肠直肠手术前的机械肠道准备不能预防吻合口漏、伤口感染、腹内脓毒症、腹内脓肿、腹外并发症等并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assess the Safety of Colorectal Surgery without Mechanical Bowel Preparation
Background: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) for elective available colorectal surgical procedure has been practiced as a clinical routine for many decades. However, earlier randomized medical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses endorse that MBP ought to be deserted earlier than colorectal surgical treatment due to the fact of the futility in decreasing postoperative problems and motility. The new published outcomes from three RCTs evaluating MBP with no MBP in colorectal surgical treatment in 2010 make the updating of systemic overview and meta-analysis necessary. Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the safety of colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. Methods: This is an observational study. The study used to be carried out in the admitted patient’s Department of Surgery Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. In Bangladesh for the duration of the period from June 2014 to May 2015. Results: This study shows that the according to age of 80 patients aged 20-above 51 years where, 4(10%) were 20-30 years, 10(25%) were 31-41 years, 10(25%) were 41-50 years, 16(40%) were 51 and above years in Group A, and 6(15%) were 20-30 years, 6(15%) were 31-40 years, 13(32.5%) were 41-50 years and 15(37.5%) were 51 and above years in Group B. And 28(70%) were males and 12(30%) were females in group A. And 27(67.5%) were males and 13(32.5%) were females in group B. Conclusions: Mechanical bowel preparation before elective colon and rectal surgery cannot prevent complications like anastomotic leakage, wound infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, abdominal abscess and extra abdominal complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bacteremias in Intensive Care Unit: A Two-Year Retrospective Study Early Puerperium Gangrenous Sigmoid Volvulus: Case Report Respiratory Distress in Children Aged 6 to 59 Months at the Pediatric Department of the Csref of Commune V of Bamako: Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Incidence, Risk Factors and Mortality of COVID-19 among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis Heartache to Happiness: Managing a Six Year Hormonal Subfertility with a Successful Rate of Conception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1