Fatma Hastaoğlu, Sevda HASTAOĞLU ÖRGEN, Eylem Itır Aydemi̇r
{"title":"AKADEMİSYENLERDE AŞI KARŞITLIĞININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ","authors":"Fatma Hastaoğlu, Sevda HASTAOĞLU ÖRGEN, Eylem Itır Aydemi̇r","doi":"10.51972/tfsd.1123484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: It was planned as a descriptive study in order to determine what academics from certain socio-cultural groups of the society think about vaccines. \nMethod: The population of the research consists of academic staff working at Sivas Cumhuriyet University. In the study, between April 2021 and May 2021, by applying the online form, 104 volunteers who volunteered to participate in the research were reached, without using the sample selection method. After obtaining the necessary ethical and official permissions, data were collected using the socio-demographic characteristics form and the anti-vaccine scale. \nResults: The mean of total anti-vaccination among academicians was 1.99±0.80. Although it was determined in this study among academics that the mean anti-vaccine score was low and the academics were not anti-vaccine, the opinion that the vaccine has no effect on the Covid-19 process and will not end the pandemic is significantly high. \nConclusion: Although there are many factors that can cause the idea of ​​​​vaccination rejection, it has been seen in many studies that the training and counseling provided are quite effective. Therefore, it is very important to raise awareness of the academicians, who are highly educated and open to education, about vaccination.","PeriodicalId":239741,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Science and Health","volume":"90 19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Science and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51972/tfsd.1123484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:计划进行一项描述性研究,以确定来自社会某些社会文化群体的学者对疫苗的看法。方法:研究对象为在西瓦斯大学工作的学术人员。在这项研究中,在2021年4月至2021年5月期间,通过申请在线表格,我们联系了104名自愿参与研究的志愿者,而没有使用样本选择方法。在获得必要的伦理和官方许可后,使用社会人口特征表和抗疫苗量表收集数据。结果:院士总抗接种数平均值为1.99±0.80。虽然在本次研究中,学者们确定了平均抗疫苗得分低,学者们不抗疫苗,但认为疫苗对Covid-19进程没有影响,不会结束大流行的观点明显很高。结论:虽然造成排斥接种的因素有很多,但许多研究表明,提供的培训和咨询是相当有效的。因此,提高受过高等教育并对教育持开放态度的院士对疫苗接种的认识非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AKADEMİSYENLERDE AŞI KARŞITLIĞININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Purpose: It was planned as a descriptive study in order to determine what academics from certain socio-cultural groups of the society think about vaccines. Method: The population of the research consists of academic staff working at Sivas Cumhuriyet University. In the study, between April 2021 and May 2021, by applying the online form, 104 volunteers who volunteered to participate in the research were reached, without using the sample selection method. After obtaining the necessary ethical and official permissions, data were collected using the socio-demographic characteristics form and the anti-vaccine scale. Results: The mean of total anti-vaccination among academicians was 1.99±0.80. Although it was determined in this study among academics that the mean anti-vaccine score was low and the academics were not anti-vaccine, the opinion that the vaccine has no effect on the Covid-19 process and will not end the pandemic is significantly high. Conclusion: Although there are many factors that can cause the idea of ​​​​vaccination rejection, it has been seen in many studies that the training and counseling provided are quite effective. Therefore, it is very important to raise awareness of the academicians, who are highly educated and open to education, about vaccination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Attitudes Towards Sports, Physical Activity Levels and Sleep Quality of University Students in Different Departments After the COVID-19 Pandemic Prostate Cancer Screening Behaviors and Health Beliefs Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening of Individuals Over 50 Years of Age: A Descriptive, Cross-Sectional Study Investigation of The Accuracy of Palpation of Physical Therapy Students to Different Anatomical Landmarks Self-Efficacy, Professional Values and Related Factors: A Group of Senior Nursing Students Investigation of Awareness of Students On Child Neglect and Abuse and Their Attitudes Towards Reporting Child Neglect and Abuse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1