{"title":"关键词提取中不同嵌入方法的比较评价","authors":"Ghaith Ashqar, Alev Mutlu","doi":"10.1109/HORA58378.2023.10156762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automatic keyword extraction from a text document is the problem of identifying in-text words or phrases that best describe the content of the text document. Recently, word embeddings found application in keyword extraction as they improve the performance by incorporating semantic information. In this study, we focus various embeddings and and compare their performance in keyword extraction. To this aim, firstly, we modified a keyword extraction system called KeyBERT to work with different embeddings. Then, we run the modfied application using ten models on seven benchmark datasets. The experimental findings show that all-mpnet-base-v2 achieved statistically better results over the other models in precision, recall, and F1 score. Moreover, all-mpnet-base-v2 achieved highest scores for MAP and MRR and also retrieved the most number of relevant keywords on the average.","PeriodicalId":247679,"journal":{"name":"2023 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Assessment of Various Embeddings for Keyword Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Ghaith Ashqar, Alev Mutlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HORA58378.2023.10156762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automatic keyword extraction from a text document is the problem of identifying in-text words or phrases that best describe the content of the text document. Recently, word embeddings found application in keyword extraction as they improve the performance by incorporating semantic information. In this study, we focus various embeddings and and compare their performance in keyword extraction. To this aim, firstly, we modified a keyword extraction system called KeyBERT to work with different embeddings. Then, we run the modfied application using ten models on seven benchmark datasets. The experimental findings show that all-mpnet-base-v2 achieved statistically better results over the other models in precision, recall, and F1 score. Moreover, all-mpnet-base-v2 achieved highest scores for MAP and MRR and also retrieved the most number of relevant keywords on the average.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA58378.2023.10156762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA58378.2023.10156762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Assessment of Various Embeddings for Keyword Extraction
Automatic keyword extraction from a text document is the problem of identifying in-text words or phrases that best describe the content of the text document. Recently, word embeddings found application in keyword extraction as they improve the performance by incorporating semantic information. In this study, we focus various embeddings and and compare their performance in keyword extraction. To this aim, firstly, we modified a keyword extraction system called KeyBERT to work with different embeddings. Then, we run the modfied application using ten models on seven benchmark datasets. The experimental findings show that all-mpnet-base-v2 achieved statistically better results over the other models in precision, recall, and F1 score. Moreover, all-mpnet-base-v2 achieved highest scores for MAP and MRR and also retrieved the most number of relevant keywords on the average.