拼凑:改革英国与欧盟的关系

P. Booth, R. Bourne
{"title":"拼凑:改革英国与欧盟的关系","authors":"P. Booth, R. Bourne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3852753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instead of allowing diversity and competition between member states, underpinned with the use of courts to prevent trade barriers, the EU has at its core a centralising, harmonising agenda. This risks raising the overall level of regulation higher than is necessary and embedding systemic risks. If the UK votes to remain in the EU, Britain should focus on changing the overall institutional structure in a more free-market direction. This agenda should focus on institutional change, rather than the repeal or refinement of particular directives. Alternatively, it will probably take a long time for Britain to disentangle itself from the EU policy. Moving towards a more classical liberal Britain is therefore a long-term endeavour. It seems likely in the event of a Brexit that the government and civil service will push for the UK to join the European Economic Area. This brings with a repatriation of some powers, but does not fully restore control across a range of economic areas. To realise the true gains from Brexit, the EEA must, in these circumstances, be very much a transitional arrangement.","PeriodicalId":341166,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the Pieces Fit: Reforming Britain’s relationship with the EU\",\"authors\":\"P. Booth, R. Bourne\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3852753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Instead of allowing diversity and competition between member states, underpinned with the use of courts to prevent trade barriers, the EU has at its core a centralising, harmonising agenda. This risks raising the overall level of regulation higher than is necessary and embedding systemic risks. If the UK votes to remain in the EU, Britain should focus on changing the overall institutional structure in a more free-market direction. This agenda should focus on institutional change, rather than the repeal or refinement of particular directives. Alternatively, it will probably take a long time for Britain to disentangle itself from the EU policy. Moving towards a more classical liberal Britain is therefore a long-term endeavour. It seems likely in the event of a Brexit that the government and civil service will push for the UK to join the European Economic Area. This brings with a repatriation of some powers, but does not fully restore control across a range of economic areas. To realise the true gains from Brexit, the EEA must, in these circumstances, be very much a transitional arrangement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟的核心议程是集中协调,而不是允许成员国之间的多样性和竞争,并利用法院来防止贸易壁垒。这可能会将整体监管水平提高到不必要的水平,并引发系统性风险。如果英国投票决定留在欧盟,英国应该把重点放在朝着更自由市场的方向改变整体制度结构上。这一议程应侧重于体制改革,而不是废除或改进特定指令。另一方面,英国可能需要很长时间才能从欧盟政策中解脱出来。因此,向更加古典自由的英国迈进是一项长期的努力。在英国脱欧的情况下,政府和公务员似乎很可能会推动英国加入欧洲经济区。这带来了一些权力的回归,但并没有完全恢复对一系列经济领域的控制。为了实现英国退欧的真正好处,在这种情况下,欧洲经济区必须在很大程度上是一种过渡性安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making the Pieces Fit: Reforming Britain’s relationship with the EU
Instead of allowing diversity and competition between member states, underpinned with the use of courts to prevent trade barriers, the EU has at its core a centralising, harmonising agenda. This risks raising the overall level of regulation higher than is necessary and embedding systemic risks. If the UK votes to remain in the EU, Britain should focus on changing the overall institutional structure in a more free-market direction. This agenda should focus on institutional change, rather than the repeal or refinement of particular directives. Alternatively, it will probably take a long time for Britain to disentangle itself from the EU policy. Moving towards a more classical liberal Britain is therefore a long-term endeavour. It seems likely in the event of a Brexit that the government and civil service will push for the UK to join the European Economic Area. This brings with a repatriation of some powers, but does not fully restore control across a range of economic areas. To realise the true gains from Brexit, the EEA must, in these circumstances, be very much a transitional arrangement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Do International Trade Shocks Propagate Through Domestic Supply Chains? Connecting World Input-Output Tables and Firm-Level Supply Chain Data The Complementarity Between Trust and Contract Enforcement Level Playing Fields and Rebalancing: A Comment Hong Kong’s Intermediary Role on Funding the BRI: How Does it Fare Against Singapore? Diminishing American Power: The US - China Trade War, Sanctions, and Coronavirus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1