人工举升系统瞬态流入动态关系建模

Z. Xiang, C. Kabir
{"title":"人工举升系统瞬态流入动态关系建模","authors":"Z. Xiang, C. Kabir","doi":"10.2118/190916-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study presents a transient inflow-performance relationship (IPR) model using the steady-state solution to the diffusivity equation on a periodic varying well-flowing pressure. A wellbore model can be coupled to accurately depict the deliverability from wells with an artificial-lift system (ALS), such as gas lift and plunger lift. The commercial simulators allowed verification of model results and field data validated the solution approach.\n For verification of this simplified IPR modeling approach, we first attempted to replicate two-step rate flow and shut-in periods, such as those associated with a transient flow test. Our model successfully reproduced those transient pressure profiles obtained from a rigorous superposition approach, generated with an analytical model using a commercial software package. Thereafter, we replicated the results of a coupled wellbore/reservoir model for a gas-lift well, using a numerical simulator. The difference between the results of rigorous simulators and our simplified transient-IPR model turned out to be well within engineering accuracy.\n Field data from two plunger lift operations validated the transient-IPR model presented in this study. One important aspect to note is that a smaller period of oscillation translates into a more significant error between the traditional steady-state IPR model and the actual transient-IPR model. This finding suggested the need for the accuracy of the transient-IPR model in ALS to express the realistic rates and pressures. By capturing the essence of transient behavior, it is possible to combat downhole tool failures due to large pressure fluctuations or issues with surface metering due to higher than expected rates.","PeriodicalId":373819,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, August 30, 2018","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Transient Inflow Performance Relationship in Artificial-Lift Systems\",\"authors\":\"Z. Xiang, C. Kabir\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/190916-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study presents a transient inflow-performance relationship (IPR) model using the steady-state solution to the diffusivity equation on a periodic varying well-flowing pressure. A wellbore model can be coupled to accurately depict the deliverability from wells with an artificial-lift system (ALS), such as gas lift and plunger lift. The commercial simulators allowed verification of model results and field data validated the solution approach.\\n For verification of this simplified IPR modeling approach, we first attempted to replicate two-step rate flow and shut-in periods, such as those associated with a transient flow test. Our model successfully reproduced those transient pressure profiles obtained from a rigorous superposition approach, generated with an analytical model using a commercial software package. Thereafter, we replicated the results of a coupled wellbore/reservoir model for a gas-lift well, using a numerical simulator. The difference between the results of rigorous simulators and our simplified transient-IPR model turned out to be well within engineering accuracy.\\n Field data from two plunger lift operations validated the transient-IPR model presented in this study. One important aspect to note is that a smaller period of oscillation translates into a more significant error between the traditional steady-state IPR model and the actual transient-IPR model. This finding suggested the need for the accuracy of the transient-IPR model in ALS to express the realistic rates and pressures. By capturing the essence of transient behavior, it is possible to combat downhole tool failures due to large pressure fluctuations or issues with surface metering due to higher than expected rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, August 30, 2018\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, August 30, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/190916-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, August 30, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190916-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用扩散系数方程的稳态解,在周期性变化的井流压力下建立了一种瞬态流入动态关系模型。井筒模型可以与人工举升系统(如气举和柱塞举升)相结合,以准确描述井的产能。商业模拟器可以验证模型结果,现场数据验证了解决方案的方法。为了验证这种简化的IPR建模方法,我们首先尝试复制两步速率流动和关井周期,例如与瞬态流动测试相关的周期。我们的模型成功地再现了从严格的叠加方法获得的瞬态压力分布,并使用商业软件包生成了分析模型。之后,我们使用数值模拟器复制了气举井的井筒/油藏耦合模型的结果。结果表明,严格的仿真结果与我们简化的瞬态ipr模型之间的差异完全符合工程精度。两次柱塞举升作业的现场数据验证了本研究中提出的瞬态ipr模型。需要注意的一个重要方面是,较小的振荡周期意味着传统稳态IPR模型与实际瞬态IPR模型之间的误差更大。这一发现表明,需要在ALS瞬态ipr模型的准确性,以表达现实的速率和压力。通过捕捉瞬态行为的本质,可以解决由于压力波动大而导致的井下工具故障或由于高于预期速率而导致的地面计量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling Transient Inflow Performance Relationship in Artificial-Lift Systems
This study presents a transient inflow-performance relationship (IPR) model using the steady-state solution to the diffusivity equation on a periodic varying well-flowing pressure. A wellbore model can be coupled to accurately depict the deliverability from wells with an artificial-lift system (ALS), such as gas lift and plunger lift. The commercial simulators allowed verification of model results and field data validated the solution approach. For verification of this simplified IPR modeling approach, we first attempted to replicate two-step rate flow and shut-in periods, such as those associated with a transient flow test. Our model successfully reproduced those transient pressure profiles obtained from a rigorous superposition approach, generated with an analytical model using a commercial software package. Thereafter, we replicated the results of a coupled wellbore/reservoir model for a gas-lift well, using a numerical simulator. The difference between the results of rigorous simulators and our simplified transient-IPR model turned out to be well within engineering accuracy. Field data from two plunger lift operations validated the transient-IPR model presented in this study. One important aspect to note is that a smaller period of oscillation translates into a more significant error between the traditional steady-state IPR model and the actual transient-IPR model. This finding suggested the need for the accuracy of the transient-IPR model in ALS to express the realistic rates and pressures. By capturing the essence of transient behavior, it is possible to combat downhole tool failures due to large pressure fluctuations or issues with surface metering due to higher than expected rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of Run-Life Measures in Estimating Artificial Lift System Reliability Tuning VSDs in ESP Wells to Optimize Oil Production—Case Studies Innovative Well Designs for HGOR: Extending Gas Production with Common Gas Well Deliquification Techniques Innovative Downhole Design for Optimizing ALS Installation at Shale Oil Wells Getting Wells Back to Production Using an Innovative Artificial Lift System for Recovering Inactive Wells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1