面向汽车应用程序的基于形式的工具包

Rainer Gmehlich, K. Grau, F. Loesch, A. Iliasov, Michael Jackson, M. Mazzara
{"title":"面向汽车应用程序的基于形式的工具包","authors":"Rainer Gmehlich, K. Grau, F. Loesch, A. Iliasov, Michael Jackson, M. Mazzara","doi":"10.1109/FORMALISE.2013.6612275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of a number of projects has been shown to be significantly improved by the use of a formalism. However, there remains an open issue: to what extent can a development process based on a singular formal notation and method succeed. The majority of approaches demonstrate a low level of flexibility by attempting to use a single notation to express all of the different aspects encountered in software development. Often, these approaches leave a number of scalability issues open. We prefer a more eclectic approach. In our experience, the use of a formalism-based toolkit with adequate notations for each development phase is a viable solution. Following this principle, any specific notation is used only where and when it is really suitable and not necessarily over the entire software lifecycle. The approach explored in this article is perhaps slowly emerging in practice - we hope to accelerate its adoption. However, the major challenge is still finding the best way to instantiate it for each specific application scenario. In this work, we describe a development process and method for automotive applications which consists of five phases. The process recognizes the need for having adequate (and tailored) notations (Problem Frames, Requirements State Machine Language, and Event-B) for each development phase as well as direct traceability between the documents produced during each phase. This allows for a stepwise verification/validation of the system under development. The ideas for the formal development method have evolved over two significant case studies carried out in the DEPLOY project.","PeriodicalId":269932,"journal":{"name":"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a formalism-based toolkit for automotive applications\",\"authors\":\"Rainer Gmehlich, K. Grau, F. Loesch, A. Iliasov, Michael Jackson, M. Mazzara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FORMALISE.2013.6612275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The success of a number of projects has been shown to be significantly improved by the use of a formalism. However, there remains an open issue: to what extent can a development process based on a singular formal notation and method succeed. The majority of approaches demonstrate a low level of flexibility by attempting to use a single notation to express all of the different aspects encountered in software development. Often, these approaches leave a number of scalability issues open. We prefer a more eclectic approach. In our experience, the use of a formalism-based toolkit with adequate notations for each development phase is a viable solution. Following this principle, any specific notation is used only where and when it is really suitable and not necessarily over the entire software lifecycle. The approach explored in this article is perhaps slowly emerging in practice - we hope to accelerate its adoption. However, the major challenge is still finding the best way to instantiate it for each specific application scenario. In this work, we describe a development process and method for automotive applications which consists of five phases. The process recognizes the need for having adequate (and tailored) notations (Problem Frames, Requirements State Machine Language, and Event-B) for each development phase as well as direct traceability between the documents produced during each phase. This allows for a stepwise verification/validation of the system under development. The ideas for the formal development method have evolved over two significant case studies carried out in the DEPLOY project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FORMALISE.2013.6612275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FORMALISE.2013.6612275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

由于采用了形式主义,一些项目的成功得到了显著改善。然而,仍然存在一个开放的问题:基于单一形式化符号和方法的开发过程在多大程度上可以成功。大多数方法都试图使用单一的符号来表达软件开发中遇到的所有不同方面,从而表现出较低的灵活性。通常,这些方法会留下许多可伸缩性问题。我们更喜欢折衷的方法。根据我们的经验,为每个开发阶段使用带有适当符号的基于形式化的工具包是一种可行的解决方案。遵循这一原则,任何特定的符号只在真正合适的地方和时间使用,而不必在整个软件生命周期中使用。本文中探讨的方法可能在实践中慢慢出现-我们希望加速它的采用。然而,主要的挑战仍然是为每个特定的应用程序场景找到实例化它的最佳方法。在这项工作中,我们描述了汽车应用程序的开发过程和方法,包括五个阶段。该过程认识到需要为每个开发阶段提供足够的(和定制的)符号(问题框架、需求状态机语言和事件- b),以及在每个阶段产生的文档之间的直接可追溯性。这允许对开发中的系统进行逐步的验证/确认。正式开发方法的思想是在DEPLOY项目中执行的两个重要案例研究中发展起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a formalism-based toolkit for automotive applications
The success of a number of projects has been shown to be significantly improved by the use of a formalism. However, there remains an open issue: to what extent can a development process based on a singular formal notation and method succeed. The majority of approaches demonstrate a low level of flexibility by attempting to use a single notation to express all of the different aspects encountered in software development. Often, these approaches leave a number of scalability issues open. We prefer a more eclectic approach. In our experience, the use of a formalism-based toolkit with adequate notations for each development phase is a viable solution. Following this principle, any specific notation is used only where and when it is really suitable and not necessarily over the entire software lifecycle. The approach explored in this article is perhaps slowly emerging in practice - we hope to accelerate its adoption. However, the major challenge is still finding the best way to instantiate it for each specific application scenario. In this work, we describe a development process and method for automotive applications which consists of five phases. The process recognizes the need for having adequate (and tailored) notations (Problem Frames, Requirements State Machine Language, and Event-B) for each development phase as well as direct traceability between the documents produced during each phase. This allows for a stepwise verification/validation of the system under development. The ideas for the formal development method have evolved over two significant case studies carried out in the DEPLOY project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recommendations for improving the usability of formal methods for product lines Do you speak Z? Formal methods under the perspective of a cross-cultural adaptation problem A framework for the rigorous design of highly adaptive timed systems Though this be madness, yet there is method in it? (Keynote) An integrated data model verifier with property templates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1