微波探针表征毫米波modfet的局限性

B. Hughes, H. Kondoh, J. Perdomo, P. Tasker
{"title":"微波探针表征毫米波modfet的局限性","authors":"B. Hughes, H. Kondoh, J. Perdomo, P. Tasker","doi":"10.1109/ARFTG.1989.323960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accuracy of microwave probing is not adequate for the characterization of MODFETs used in the most demanding mm-wave circuit applications. Accuracy of 5 % for most device model circuit elements is desireable. This requirement demands accuracies of 1 fF, 1 pH, 0.08 ¿ and 0.1 pS. Examples are given demonstrating why this accuracy is desired and the calibration errors limiting this accuracy. The pads normally used to allow contact of the probes to the devices introduce parasitic capacitances that are significant (e.g., Cgd = 1.8 fF) for small mm-wave devices. The standard calibration technique does not account for the pads. It is shown that the pad capacitances can not be simply subtracted because of 3 body capacitance effects. The pads also move the reference planes back from the intrinsic device; this effect appears as inductances that have a significant effect on the model for larger MODFETs. For example, an error of 10 pH in the gate inductance of a 350 ¿m wide MODFET reduces the modelled gain of a narrow-band 42 GHz amp by 3 dB. Measurements of the standard Load-Open-Short-Thru calibration reflection standards using a Load-Reflect-Thru calibration suggest that the open capacitance accuracy is worse than 3 fF. Modelling showed that an error 0.1 pS in the transmission reflection planes produces an Rgs error of 10 % for active MODFETs and 50 % for passive MODFET. Experiments suggest the error is worse than 0.1 pS.","PeriodicalId":153615,"journal":{"name":"34th ARFTG Conference Digest","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitations of Characterizing mm-Wave MODFETs with Microwave Probes\",\"authors\":\"B. Hughes, H. Kondoh, J. Perdomo, P. Tasker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARFTG.1989.323960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accuracy of microwave probing is not adequate for the characterization of MODFETs used in the most demanding mm-wave circuit applications. Accuracy of 5 % for most device model circuit elements is desireable. This requirement demands accuracies of 1 fF, 1 pH, 0.08 ¿ and 0.1 pS. Examples are given demonstrating why this accuracy is desired and the calibration errors limiting this accuracy. The pads normally used to allow contact of the probes to the devices introduce parasitic capacitances that are significant (e.g., Cgd = 1.8 fF) for small mm-wave devices. The standard calibration technique does not account for the pads. It is shown that the pad capacitances can not be simply subtracted because of 3 body capacitance effects. The pads also move the reference planes back from the intrinsic device; this effect appears as inductances that have a significant effect on the model for larger MODFETs. For example, an error of 10 pH in the gate inductance of a 350 ¿m wide MODFET reduces the modelled gain of a narrow-band 42 GHz amp by 3 dB. Measurements of the standard Load-Open-Short-Thru calibration reflection standards using a Load-Reflect-Thru calibration suggest that the open capacitance accuracy is worse than 3 fF. Modelling showed that an error 0.1 pS in the transmission reflection planes produces an Rgs error of 10 % for active MODFETs and 50 % for passive MODFET. Experiments suggest the error is worse than 0.1 pS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"34th ARFTG Conference Digest\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"34th ARFTG Conference Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.1989.323960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34th ARFTG Conference Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.1989.323960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

微波探测的精度不足以表征最苛刻的毫米波电路应用中使用的modfet。对于大多数器件模型电路元件来说,5%的精度是理想的。这一要求要求精度为1 fF, 1 pH, 0.08¿和0.1 pS。给出的例子说明了为什么需要这种精度以及限制这种精度的校准误差。通常用于使探头接触器件的焊盘会引入寄生电容,这对于小型毫米波器件来说是非常重要的(例如,Cgd = 1.8 fF)。标准校准技术不考虑焊盘。结果表明,由于三体电容效应,焊盘电容不能简单地减去。垫也将参考平面从固有装置移动回来;对于较大的modfet,这种效应表现为对模型有显著影响的电感。例如,350 μ m宽MODFET的栅极电感误差为10 pH会使42 GHz窄带放大器的模拟增益降低3 dB。使用负载-反射-通校准对标准负载-开-短通校准反射标准的测量表明,开电容精度低于3ff。建模表明,在传输反射平面上,0.1 pS的误差会导致有源MODFET的Rgs误差为10%,无源MODFET的Rgs误差为50%。实验表明,误差小于0.1 pS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Limitations of Characterizing mm-Wave MODFETs with Microwave Probes
The accuracy of microwave probing is not adequate for the characterization of MODFETs used in the most demanding mm-wave circuit applications. Accuracy of 5 % for most device model circuit elements is desireable. This requirement demands accuracies of 1 fF, 1 pH, 0.08 ¿ and 0.1 pS. Examples are given demonstrating why this accuracy is desired and the calibration errors limiting this accuracy. The pads normally used to allow contact of the probes to the devices introduce parasitic capacitances that are significant (e.g., Cgd = 1.8 fF) for small mm-wave devices. The standard calibration technique does not account for the pads. It is shown that the pad capacitances can not be simply subtracted because of 3 body capacitance effects. The pads also move the reference planes back from the intrinsic device; this effect appears as inductances that have a significant effect on the model for larger MODFETs. For example, an error of 10 pH in the gate inductance of a 350 ¿m wide MODFET reduces the modelled gain of a narrow-band 42 GHz amp by 3 dB. Measurements of the standard Load-Open-Short-Thru calibration reflection standards using a Load-Reflect-Thru calibration suggest that the open capacitance accuracy is worse than 3 fF. Modelling showed that an error 0.1 pS in the transmission reflection planes produces an Rgs error of 10 % for active MODFETs and 50 % for passive MODFET. Experiments suggest the error is worse than 0.1 pS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Calibration and Verification Standards in Microstrip to 60 GHz An Integrated Approach to High-Volume Production and Automated Testing of Microwave Power Modules, Using Distributed PCS On-Wafer Microwave Standards at NIST A Generalized Vector Network Analyzer Calibration Technique Wafer-Level ANA Calibrations at NIST
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1