私人并购与杠杆收购交易之间的折扣溢价

Anis Mnejja, Jean-Michel Sahut
{"title":"私人并购与杠杆收购交易之间的折扣溢价","authors":"Anis Mnejja, Jean-Michel Sahut","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1676139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial buyers consistently paid their acquisitions cheaper than strategic buyers did in the 1990 (Butler 2001). One of the explanations is that they follow a dispassionate approach as they screen a dozen of deals for each transaction. Strategic buyers are restricted to their industry sector and therefore to a few targets. One other explanation is that financial buyers have developed good negotiation skill. They also overestimate synergies and can get carried away in the auction process (Roll 1986, Gaughan 2002). In this study, we seek to establish the existence of discount premium applied by financial buyers. Our study is important because the extant practitioner and academic literature tends to equate a discount premium with a liquidity discount. While the market prices of public companies are readily available, pricing information about private firms is scarce. The method of comparables along with estimates of the discount premium are routinely used to value private firms, typically in conjunction with valuation approaches such as forecasting and discounting future cash flows. The starting point in the method of comparables is to identify comparable public firms and determine an appropriate public-firm valuation multiple of an accounting fundamental. Using a novel data of 200 private LBO and M&A European transactions in small and midcaps, this article explain the reasons of this difference and estimate the discount premium between M&A and LBO transactions for the period 2004-2007. We follow the same methodology used by Koplein et al (2000), and Officer (2007). We have identified a set of acquisitions made by private equity firms with LBO. For each LBO transactions, we have identified an acquisition of private company, in the same industry that was acquired around the same time and that was closest in size. Then we compare the valuation price paid by the financial and the strategic acquirer. Our inferences rely on the use of enterprise-value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) and enterprise-value-to-sales (EV/SALES) multiples, two valuation multiples widely used in practice. The principal findings of our research can be summarized as follows: French LBO transactions are acquired at an average discount of 16.20 % to 17.25 % relative to similar French M&A transaction. UK LBO transactions are acquired at an average discount of 15% relative to similar UK M&A transaction. Both financial and strategic UK buyers paid their acquisitions higher than French and European buyers. Using both a univariate and a multivariate approach that overcome the selection biais due to difference in size and controls for differences in industry, firm size and growth, we find that financial buyers pays their acquisition lowers than strategic buyers with a discount premium that ranges from 16 and 24%.","PeriodicalId":127572,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Discount Premium between Private M&A and LBO Transactions\",\"authors\":\"Anis Mnejja, Jean-Michel Sahut\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1676139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Financial buyers consistently paid their acquisitions cheaper than strategic buyers did in the 1990 (Butler 2001). One of the explanations is that they follow a dispassionate approach as they screen a dozen of deals for each transaction. Strategic buyers are restricted to their industry sector and therefore to a few targets. One other explanation is that financial buyers have developed good negotiation skill. They also overestimate synergies and can get carried away in the auction process (Roll 1986, Gaughan 2002). In this study, we seek to establish the existence of discount premium applied by financial buyers. Our study is important because the extant practitioner and academic literature tends to equate a discount premium with a liquidity discount. While the market prices of public companies are readily available, pricing information about private firms is scarce. The method of comparables along with estimates of the discount premium are routinely used to value private firms, typically in conjunction with valuation approaches such as forecasting and discounting future cash flows. The starting point in the method of comparables is to identify comparable public firms and determine an appropriate public-firm valuation multiple of an accounting fundamental. Using a novel data of 200 private LBO and M&A European transactions in small and midcaps, this article explain the reasons of this difference and estimate the discount premium between M&A and LBO transactions for the period 2004-2007. We follow the same methodology used by Koplein et al (2000), and Officer (2007). We have identified a set of acquisitions made by private equity firms with LBO. For each LBO transactions, we have identified an acquisition of private company, in the same industry that was acquired around the same time and that was closest in size. Then we compare the valuation price paid by the financial and the strategic acquirer. Our inferences rely on the use of enterprise-value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) and enterprise-value-to-sales (EV/SALES) multiples, two valuation multiples widely used in practice. The principal findings of our research can be summarized as follows: French LBO transactions are acquired at an average discount of 16.20 % to 17.25 % relative to similar French M&A transaction. UK LBO transactions are acquired at an average discount of 15% relative to similar UK M&A transaction. Both financial and strategic UK buyers paid their acquisitions higher than French and European buyers. Using both a univariate and a multivariate approach that overcome the selection biais due to difference in size and controls for differences in industry, firm size and growth, we find that financial buyers pays their acquisition lowers than strategic buyers with a discount premium that ranges from 16 and 24%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1676139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1676139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1990年,金融买家支付的收购价格一直低于战略买家(Butler 2001)。其中一种解释是,他们在为每笔交易筛选十几笔交易时,都遵循一种冷静的方法。战略买家被限制在他们的行业领域,因此只有少数目标。另一种解释是,金融买家已经发展出了良好的谈判技巧。他们还高估了协同效应,并可能在拍卖过程中忘乎所以(Roll 1986, Gaughan 2002)。在本研究中,我们试图建立金融买家应用的折扣溢价的存在性。我们的研究很重要,因为现有的从业者和学术文献倾向于将贴现溢价等同于流动性贴现。虽然上市公司的市场价格很容易获得,但关于私营公司的定价信息却很少。可比性方法和对折扣溢价的估计通常用于对私营公司进行估值,通常与预测和贴现未来现金流等估值方法相结合。可比性方法的出发点是确定可比较的上市公司,并确定会计基础的适当上市公司估值倍数。本文利用200个欧洲中小型股私募杠杆收购和并购交易的新数据,解释了这种差异的原因,并估计了2004-2007年期间并购和杠杆收购交易之间的折扣溢价。我们遵循Koplein等人(2000)和Officer(2007)使用的相同方法。我们已经确定了一系列私人股本公司通过杠杆收购进行的收购。对于每一笔杠杆收购交易,我们都确定了对同一行业的私人公司的收购,这些公司在同一时间被收购,规模也最接近。然后比较了财务收购方和战略收购方所支付的估值价格。我们的推断依赖于企业价值对EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)和企业价值对销售额(EV/SALES)的倍数,这两种估值倍数在实践中被广泛使用。我们研究的主要发现可以概括如下:法国杠杆收购交易相对于法国同类并购交易的平均折扣为16.20%至17.25%。与英国类似的并购交易相比,英国杠杆收购交易的平均折扣为15%。英国金融和战略买家支付的收购价格都高于法国和欧洲买家。使用单变量和多变量方法克服了由于规模差异和对行业、公司规模和增长差异的控制而产生的选择偏差,我们发现金融买家支付的收购费用低于战略买家,折扣溢价在16%到24%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Discount Premium between Private M&A and LBO Transactions
Financial buyers consistently paid their acquisitions cheaper than strategic buyers did in the 1990 (Butler 2001). One of the explanations is that they follow a dispassionate approach as they screen a dozen of deals for each transaction. Strategic buyers are restricted to their industry sector and therefore to a few targets. One other explanation is that financial buyers have developed good negotiation skill. They also overestimate synergies and can get carried away in the auction process (Roll 1986, Gaughan 2002). In this study, we seek to establish the existence of discount premium applied by financial buyers. Our study is important because the extant practitioner and academic literature tends to equate a discount premium with a liquidity discount. While the market prices of public companies are readily available, pricing information about private firms is scarce. The method of comparables along with estimates of the discount premium are routinely used to value private firms, typically in conjunction with valuation approaches such as forecasting and discounting future cash flows. The starting point in the method of comparables is to identify comparable public firms and determine an appropriate public-firm valuation multiple of an accounting fundamental. Using a novel data of 200 private LBO and M&A European transactions in small and midcaps, this article explain the reasons of this difference and estimate the discount premium between M&A and LBO transactions for the period 2004-2007. We follow the same methodology used by Koplein et al (2000), and Officer (2007). We have identified a set of acquisitions made by private equity firms with LBO. For each LBO transactions, we have identified an acquisition of private company, in the same industry that was acquired around the same time and that was closest in size. Then we compare the valuation price paid by the financial and the strategic acquirer. Our inferences rely on the use of enterprise-value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) and enterprise-value-to-sales (EV/SALES) multiples, two valuation multiples widely used in practice. The principal findings of our research can be summarized as follows: French LBO transactions are acquired at an average discount of 16.20 % to 17.25 % relative to similar French M&A transaction. UK LBO transactions are acquired at an average discount of 15% relative to similar UK M&A transaction. Both financial and strategic UK buyers paid their acquisitions higher than French and European buyers. Using both a univariate and a multivariate approach that overcome the selection biais due to difference in size and controls for differences in industry, firm size and growth, we find that financial buyers pays their acquisition lowers than strategic buyers with a discount premium that ranges from 16 and 24%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Private Equity and Human Capital Risk Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity: Reply to Ayash and Rastad A Theory of LBO Activity Based on Repeated Debt-Equity Conflicts Fare Thee Well? An Analysis of Buyout Funds' Exit Strategies The Impact of Investor Protection Law on Takeovers: The Case of Leveraged Buyouts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1