托尔金的中土世界。试管中的神话

Robin Auer, M. Krümpelmann
{"title":"托尔金的中土世界。试管中的神话","authors":"Robin Auer, M. Krümpelmann","doi":"10.5771/9783828870673-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When dealing with myth, the intuitive question to ask is: 'What is myth?' The sheer variety and scope of possible answers, however, has rendered this question impractical, and as hoping to find a concise definition for a phenomenon so widely discussed seems undue, one may find that asking what 'constitutes' myth is a more humble, yet perhaps also more rewarding pursuit, as it asks for aspects rather than consistent concepts. There is a huge variety of aspects that might be studied when engaging with myth and in the course of this paper we will try to cover those that seem to us indispensable: essential components, workings, and functions. Unlike most research, however, we will approach these aspects of myth from yet another perspective and ask: 'How is myth made?' In order to do this, we will take a look at a mod­ ern myth the creation of which might be the most well-documented process of myth-making: J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle-Earth mythology. 'The construction of elaborate and consistent mythology (and two languages) rather occupies the mind' writes Tolkien in a let­ ter to his publisher Stanley Unwin in 1937.1 And indeed Tolkien's mind seems to have been occupied with this act of constructing Middle-Earth for most of his life, while his professional career was spent studying and lecturing on philology and the medieval myths of (Northern) Europe at Oxford University. We will therefore start by problematising existing concepts and conceptions of myth and developing our own linguistic ap­ proach, followed by a discussion of the ways in which Tolkien as a scholar was influenced by myth and in turn went on to influence myth with his literary work. The final part will then deal with Tolkien's mythical world and its languages in detail, and how a characterisation of myth as an inherently linguistic phe­ nomenon can be derived from Tolkien's synthetic myth.","PeriodicalId":368487,"journal":{"name":"Der Mythos vom Mythos","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolkien's Middle-Earth. A Myth in a Test Tube\",\"authors\":\"Robin Auer, M. Krümpelmann\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783828870673-161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When dealing with myth, the intuitive question to ask is: 'What is myth?' The sheer variety and scope of possible answers, however, has rendered this question impractical, and as hoping to find a concise definition for a phenomenon so widely discussed seems undue, one may find that asking what 'constitutes' myth is a more humble, yet perhaps also more rewarding pursuit, as it asks for aspects rather than consistent concepts. There is a huge variety of aspects that might be studied when engaging with myth and in the course of this paper we will try to cover those that seem to us indispensable: essential components, workings, and functions. Unlike most research, however, we will approach these aspects of myth from yet another perspective and ask: 'How is myth made?' In order to do this, we will take a look at a mod­ ern myth the creation of which might be the most well-documented process of myth-making: J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle-Earth mythology. 'The construction of elaborate and consistent mythology (and two languages) rather occupies the mind' writes Tolkien in a let­ ter to his publisher Stanley Unwin in 1937.1 And indeed Tolkien's mind seems to have been occupied with this act of constructing Middle-Earth for most of his life, while his professional career was spent studying and lecturing on philology and the medieval myths of (Northern) Europe at Oxford University. We will therefore start by problematising existing concepts and conceptions of myth and developing our own linguistic ap­ proach, followed by a discussion of the ways in which Tolkien as a scholar was influenced by myth and in turn went on to influence myth with his literary work. The final part will then deal with Tolkien's mythical world and its languages in detail, and how a characterisation of myth as an inherently linguistic phe­ nomenon can be derived from Tolkien's synthetic myth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Der Mythos vom Mythos\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Der Mythos vom Mythos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783828870673-161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Der Mythos vom Mythos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783828870673-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在处理神话时,直觉上要问的问题是:“什么是神话?”然而,可能的答案的纯粹多样性和范围使这个问题变得不切实际,并且希望为一个如此广泛讨论的现象找到一个简洁的定义似乎是不恰当的,人们可能会发现,询问“构成”神话的是一种更谦逊的追求,但也许也是更有益的追求,因为它要求的是方面而不是一致的概念。在研究神话的过程中,我们可以研究很多方面,在本文中,我们将尝试涵盖那些对我们来说必不可少的方面:基本组成部分,工作原理和功能。然而,与大多数研究不同的是,我们将从另一个角度来研究神话的这些方面,并问:“神话是如何形成的?”为了做到这一点,我们将看一看一个现代神话,它的创作可能是最完整的神话制作过程:J.R.R.托尔金的中土神话。1937年,托尔金在给他的出版商斯坦利·昂温的一封信中写道:“精心制作的连贯的神话(和两种语言)占据了他的思想。”的确,托尔金的大部分时间似乎都在想着构建中土世界,而他的职业生涯则是在牛津大学研究和讲授语言学和(北欧)中世纪神话。因此,我们将首先对现有的神话概念和概念提出问题,并发展我们自己的语言学方法,然后讨论托尔金作为一个学者是如何受到神话的影响的,然后又通过他的文学作品继续影响神话。最后一部分将详细讨论托尔金的神话世界及其语言,以及如何从托尔金的综合神话中推导出神话作为一种内在的语言现象的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tolkien's Middle-Earth. A Myth in a Test Tube
When dealing with myth, the intuitive question to ask is: 'What is myth?' The sheer variety and scope of possible answers, however, has rendered this question impractical, and as hoping to find a concise definition for a phenomenon so widely discussed seems undue, one may find that asking what 'constitutes' myth is a more humble, yet perhaps also more rewarding pursuit, as it asks for aspects rather than consistent concepts. There is a huge variety of aspects that might be studied when engaging with myth and in the course of this paper we will try to cover those that seem to us indispensable: essential components, workings, and functions. Unlike most research, however, we will approach these aspects of myth from yet another perspective and ask: 'How is myth made?' In order to do this, we will take a look at a mod­ ern myth the creation of which might be the most well-documented process of myth-making: J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle-Earth mythology. 'The construction of elaborate and consistent mythology (and two languages) rather occupies the mind' writes Tolkien in a let­ ter to his publisher Stanley Unwin in 1937.1 And indeed Tolkien's mind seems to have been occupied with this act of constructing Middle-Earth for most of his life, while his professional career was spent studying and lecturing on philology and the medieval myths of (Northern) Europe at Oxford University. We will therefore start by problematising existing concepts and conceptions of myth and developing our own linguistic ap­ proach, followed by a discussion of the ways in which Tolkien as a scholar was influenced by myth and in turn went on to influence myth with his literary work. The final part will then deal with Tolkien's mythical world and its languages in detail, and how a characterisation of myth as an inherently linguistic phe­ nomenon can be derived from Tolkien's synthetic myth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tolkien's Middle-Earth. A Myth in a Test Tube Mythos als Grundlage des Lebens bei Platon, Nietzsche und Heidegger Die Leistungsfähigkeit der Kategorie des Mythos für die christliche Wirklichkeitswahrnehmung. Märtyrerakten im spätantiken Christentum Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Mythos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1