学习平台的教育设计、评估与开发

T. Thompson, D. Heer, Shane Brown, R. Traylor, Terri S. Fiez
{"title":"学习平台的教育设计、评估与开发","authors":"T. Thompson, D. Heer, Shane Brown, R. Traylor, Terri S. Fiez","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systemic reform in undergraduate engineering education is critical to improving student ability and understanding. Electrical engineering and computer science at Oregon State University has worked in collaboration with university science and math education researchers to implement large-scale curriculum reform based on a platform for learning/spl trade/. To successfully approach such a large systemic problem and introduce major education reform, an approach called design research has been used. Design research involves a team of education designers that manage a series of iterative cycles of design, implementation, and evaluation. Each cycle provides the empirical evidence needed to improve instruction, and refine the education theory related to platforms for learning. The design research process has brought a much richer and expansive understanding of the platforms for learning concept and engineering education in general. In part concepts like cross-cutting competencies (which include enhancing community building, student innovation and design skills, depth, breadth and professionalism), educational hardware design, and horizontal and vertical inter-class connections have been better understood through the research. This paper summarizes the design research process as it is used at OSU to reform engineering education. Findings specific to a platform for learning and generally applicable to engineering education are discussed. Finally, implementation changes that resulted from the design research process are presented.","PeriodicalId":339926,"journal":{"name":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational design, evaluation, & development of platforms for learning\",\"authors\":\"T. Thompson, D. Heer, Shane Brown, R. Traylor, Terri S. Fiez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systemic reform in undergraduate engineering education is critical to improving student ability and understanding. Electrical engineering and computer science at Oregon State University has worked in collaboration with university science and math education researchers to implement large-scale curriculum reform based on a platform for learning/spl trade/. To successfully approach such a large systemic problem and introduce major education reform, an approach called design research has been used. Design research involves a team of education designers that manage a series of iterative cycles of design, implementation, and evaluation. Each cycle provides the empirical evidence needed to improve instruction, and refine the education theory related to platforms for learning. The design research process has brought a much richer and expansive understanding of the platforms for learning concept and engineering education in general. In part concepts like cross-cutting competencies (which include enhancing community building, student innovation and design skills, depth, breadth and professionalism), educational hardware design, and horizontal and vertical inter-class connections have been better understood through the research. This paper summarizes the design research process as it is used at OSU to reform engineering education. Findings specific to a platform for learning and generally applicable to engineering education are discussed. Finally, implementation changes that resulted from the design research process are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本科工程教育的系统改革是提高学生能力和理解力的关键。俄勒冈州立大学电子工程和计算机科学学院与大学科学和数学教育研究人员合作,实施了基于学习/spl贸易/平台的大规模课程改革。为了成功地解决如此大的系统性问题并引入重大的教育改革,一种被称为设计研究的方法已经被使用。设计研究涉及一组教育设计师,他们管理一系列设计、实施和评估的迭代周期。每个周期都提供了改进教学所需的经验证据,并完善了与学习平台相关的教育理论。设计研究的过程使我们对概念学习和工程教育的平台有了更加丰富和广泛的理解。在某种程度上,跨领域能力(包括加强社区建设、学生创新和设计技能、深度、广度和专业性)、教育硬件设计以及横向和纵向的班级间联系等概念通过研究得到了更好的理解。本文总结了设计研究在俄勒冈州立大学改革工程教育的过程。讨论了特定于学习平台的发现,并普遍适用于工程教育。最后,介绍了设计研究过程中产生的实施变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Educational design, evaluation, & development of platforms for learning
Systemic reform in undergraduate engineering education is critical to improving student ability and understanding. Electrical engineering and computer science at Oregon State University has worked in collaboration with university science and math education researchers to implement large-scale curriculum reform based on a platform for learning/spl trade/. To successfully approach such a large systemic problem and introduce major education reform, an approach called design research has been used. Design research involves a team of education designers that manage a series of iterative cycles of design, implementation, and evaluation. Each cycle provides the empirical evidence needed to improve instruction, and refine the education theory related to platforms for learning. The design research process has brought a much richer and expansive understanding of the platforms for learning concept and engineering education in general. In part concepts like cross-cutting competencies (which include enhancing community building, student innovation and design skills, depth, breadth and professionalism), educational hardware design, and horizontal and vertical inter-class connections have been better understood through the research. This paper summarizes the design research process as it is used at OSU to reform engineering education. Findings specific to a platform for learning and generally applicable to engineering education are discussed. Finally, implementation changes that resulted from the design research process are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching entrepreneurial leadership: a project-based approach For an online course encompassing "traditional campus students": how, where, and when students work and engage with the course material The current status of graphical communication in engineering education Work in progress - ethics instruction for the workplace Work in progress: a concept inventory for heat transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1