基于特征的人脸识别算法在不同姿态下的独立分析

Kavita R. Singh, M. Zaveri, M. Raghuwanshi
{"title":"基于特征的人脸识别算法在不同姿态下的独立分析","authors":"Kavita R. Singh, M. Zaveri, M. Raghuwanshi","doi":"10.3233/KES-140286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feature based face recognition algorithms are computationally efficient compared to model based approaches. These algorithms have proved themselves for face identification under variations in poses. However, the literature lacks with direct and detailed investigation of these algorithms in completely equal working conditions. This motivates us to carry out an independent performance analysis of well known feature based face identification algorithms for different poses with mug-shot face database situation. The analysis focuses on variations in performance of feature based algorithms in terms of identification rates due to variation in poses. The analysis is carried out in face identification scenario using large amount of images from the standard face databases such as AT&T, Georgian Face database and Head Pose Image database. We analysed state-of-the art feature based algorithms such as PCA, log Gabor, DCT and FPLBP and found that, log Gabor outperforms for larger degree of pose variation with an average identification rate 82.47% with three training images for Head Pose Image database.","PeriodicalId":210048,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent analysis of feature based face recognition algorithms under varying poses\",\"authors\":\"Kavita R. Singh, M. Zaveri, M. Raghuwanshi\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/KES-140286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feature based face recognition algorithms are computationally efficient compared to model based approaches. These algorithms have proved themselves for face identification under variations in poses. However, the literature lacks with direct and detailed investigation of these algorithms in completely equal working conditions. This motivates us to carry out an independent performance analysis of well known feature based face identification algorithms for different poses with mug-shot face database situation. The analysis focuses on variations in performance of feature based algorithms in terms of identification rates due to variation in poses. The analysis is carried out in face identification scenario using large amount of images from the standard face databases such as AT&T, Georgian Face database and Head Pose Image database. We analysed state-of-the art feature based algorithms such as PCA, log Gabor, DCT and FPLBP and found that, log Gabor outperforms for larger degree of pose variation with an average identification rate 82.47% with three training images for Head Pose Image database.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/KES-140286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KES-140286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与基于模型的方法相比,基于特征的人脸识别算法计算效率更高。这些算法已经被证明可以在不同姿势下进行人脸识别。然而,文献缺乏在完全平等的工作条件下对这些算法进行直接和详细的调查。这促使我们对已知的基于特征的人脸识别算法进行独立的性能分析,以适应不同姿势和面部照片数据库的情况。分析的重点是基于特征的算法在识别率方面的变化,这是由于姿势的变化。在人脸识别场景中,使用大量来自标准人脸数据库(如AT&T、georgia face数据库和Head Pose Image数据库)的图像进行分析。我们分析了基于特征的PCA、log Gabor、DCT和FPLBP等算法,发现log Gabor算法对于姿态变化程度较大的头部姿态图像数据库的平均识别率为82.47%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Independent analysis of feature based face recognition algorithms under varying poses
Feature based face recognition algorithms are computationally efficient compared to model based approaches. These algorithms have proved themselves for face identification under variations in poses. However, the literature lacks with direct and detailed investigation of these algorithms in completely equal working conditions. This motivates us to carry out an independent performance analysis of well known feature based face identification algorithms for different poses with mug-shot face database situation. The analysis focuses on variations in performance of feature based algorithms in terms of identification rates due to variation in poses. The analysis is carried out in face identification scenario using large amount of images from the standard face databases such as AT&T, Georgian Face database and Head Pose Image database. We analysed state-of-the art feature based algorithms such as PCA, log Gabor, DCT and FPLBP and found that, log Gabor outperforms for larger degree of pose variation with an average identification rate 82.47% with three training images for Head Pose Image database.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DICO: Dingo coot optimization-based ZF net for pansharpening Hybrid modified weighted water cycle algorithm and Deep Analytic Network for forecasting and trend detection of forex market indices Autonomous gesture recognition using multi-layer LSTM networks and laban movement analysis KinRob: An ontology based robot for solving kinematic problems Machine learning approach for corona virus disease extrapolation: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1