机器人与人工全膝关节置换术在低容量与高容量手术中的早期术后结果。

D. Hoeffel, L. Goldstein, K. Michnacs, J. Ruppenkamp, Manoranjith Anandan, C. Holy
{"title":"机器人与人工全膝关节置换术在低容量与高容量手术中的早期术后结果。","authors":"D. Hoeffel, L. Goldstein, K. Michnacs, J. Ruppenkamp, Manoranjith Anandan, C. Holy","doi":"10.29007/cxql","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Primary robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with favorable outcomes. To further understand robotic TKA learning curve, we evaluated early postoperative outcomes of robotics vs. manual TKA, based on surgeon experience. Methods: Patients (> 64 years) from the Medicare database, with primary, unilateral, elective TKA (“index”) from October 2015 to December 2019 were identified and categorized based on robotic vs. manual surgery, and surgeon experience: low-count surgeons had < 40 cases in the 12-months pre-index; medium-low, medium- high and high count surgeons had 41-80, 81-120 and 121-160 cases, respectively. The low-count robotic cohort (RC) was compared to the low, medium-low, medium-high, and high count manual cohort (MC) for the length of the hospital stay (LOS), and rates of home and skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge. Descriptive statistics (means and proportion with 95% confidence intervals) were performed. Results: 296 low-count robotic cases were compared to 209,494 low-count manual and 252,905 medium-low, medium-high and high-count manual cases. The low-count RC had an average LOS of 2.03 days (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.86-2.20) vs. 2.20 days (95%CI: 2.20-2.21) for the low-count MC. 82.4% patients (95%CI: 78.1%-86.8%) from the low-count RC were discharged home vs. 74.2% (95%CI: 74.0%-74.4%) in the low-count MC and 83.6% (95%CI: 83.3%-84.0%) in the high-count MC. Discharge to SNF affected 15.2% (95%CI: 11.1%-19.3%) in the low-count RC vs. 21.0% (95%CI: 20.9%-21.2%) and 15.2% (95%CI: 14.9%-15.4%) in the low-count and medium-high MC, respectively. Conclusion: Patients operated with robotic surgery by surgeons with low yearly volume had a LOS and probability of home discharge similar to that of patients operated with manual surgery by high-volume surgeons. Patients in the robotic group also had a lower rate of SNF discharge compared to the patients in the manual surgery group, with surgeons of similar experience.","PeriodicalId":385854,"journal":{"name":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early post-operative outcomes following robotic vs. manual total knee arthroplasty in low- vs. high-volume surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"D. Hoeffel, L. Goldstein, K. Michnacs, J. Ruppenkamp, Manoranjith Anandan, C. Holy\",\"doi\":\"10.29007/cxql\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Primary robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with favorable outcomes. To further understand robotic TKA learning curve, we evaluated early postoperative outcomes of robotics vs. manual TKA, based on surgeon experience. Methods: Patients (> 64 years) from the Medicare database, with primary, unilateral, elective TKA (“index”) from October 2015 to December 2019 were identified and categorized based on robotic vs. manual surgery, and surgeon experience: low-count surgeons had < 40 cases in the 12-months pre-index; medium-low, medium- high and high count surgeons had 41-80, 81-120 and 121-160 cases, respectively. The low-count robotic cohort (RC) was compared to the low, medium-low, medium-high, and high count manual cohort (MC) for the length of the hospital stay (LOS), and rates of home and skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge. Descriptive statistics (means and proportion with 95% confidence intervals) were performed. Results: 296 low-count robotic cases were compared to 209,494 low-count manual and 252,905 medium-low, medium-high and high-count manual cases. The low-count RC had an average LOS of 2.03 days (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.86-2.20) vs. 2.20 days (95%CI: 2.20-2.21) for the low-count MC. 82.4% patients (95%CI: 78.1%-86.8%) from the low-count RC were discharged home vs. 74.2% (95%CI: 74.0%-74.4%) in the low-count MC and 83.6% (95%CI: 83.3%-84.0%) in the high-count MC. Discharge to SNF affected 15.2% (95%CI: 11.1%-19.3%) in the low-count RC vs. 21.0% (95%CI: 20.9%-21.2%) and 15.2% (95%CI: 14.9%-15.4%) in the low-count and medium-high MC, respectively. Conclusion: Patients operated with robotic surgery by surgeons with low yearly volume had a LOS and probability of home discharge similar to that of patients operated with manual surgery by high-volume surgeons. Patients in the robotic group also had a lower rate of SNF discharge compared to the patients in the manual surgery group, with surgeons of similar experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29007/cxql\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/cxql","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级机器人全膝关节置换术(TKA)具有良好的预后。为了进一步了解机器人TKA的学习曲线,我们根据外科医生的经验评估了机器人与人工TKA的早期术后结果。方法:对2015年10月至2019年12月来自Medicare数据库的原发性、单侧、选择性TKA(“指数”)患者(> 64岁)进行识别,并根据机器人手术与人工手术以及外科医生经验进行分类:低计数外科医生在指数前12个月内< 40例;中低、中高、高计数分别为41 ~ 80例、81 ~ 120例、121 ~ 160例。将低计数机器人队列(RC)与低、中低、中高和高计数人工队列(MC)在住院时间(LOS)以及家庭和熟练护理机构(SNF)出院率方面进行比较。进行描述性统计(均值和95%置信区间的比例)。结果:低计数机器人296例,低计数人工209494例,中低、中高、高计数人工252905例。低计数RC的平均生存时间为2.03天(95%可信区间(CI): 1.86-2.20),低计数MC的平均生存时间为2.20天(95%可信区间(CI): 2.20-2.21)。82.4% (95%CI: 78.1%-86.8%)的低计数RC出院回家,74.2% (95%CI: 74.0%-74.4%)的低计数MC出院回家,83.6% (95%CI: 83.3%-84.0%)的高计数MC出院回家。低计数RC的15.2% (95%CI: 11.1%-19.3%)的低计数RC出院回家,21.0% (95%CI: 20.9%-21.2%)和15.2% (95%CI: 2.2%)的高计数MC出院回家。低计数和中高计数MC分别为14.9%-15.4%)。结论:由年业务量较小的外科医生进行机器人手术的患者的LOS和出院概率与由大业务量外科医生进行手工手术的患者相似。与具有相似经验的外科医生相比,机器人组的患者SNF出院率也较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early post-operative outcomes following robotic vs. manual total knee arthroplasty in low- vs. high-volume surgeons.
Introduction: Primary robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with favorable outcomes. To further understand robotic TKA learning curve, we evaluated early postoperative outcomes of robotics vs. manual TKA, based on surgeon experience. Methods: Patients (> 64 years) from the Medicare database, with primary, unilateral, elective TKA (“index”) from October 2015 to December 2019 were identified and categorized based on robotic vs. manual surgery, and surgeon experience: low-count surgeons had < 40 cases in the 12-months pre-index; medium-low, medium- high and high count surgeons had 41-80, 81-120 and 121-160 cases, respectively. The low-count robotic cohort (RC) was compared to the low, medium-low, medium-high, and high count manual cohort (MC) for the length of the hospital stay (LOS), and rates of home and skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge. Descriptive statistics (means and proportion with 95% confidence intervals) were performed. Results: 296 low-count robotic cases were compared to 209,494 low-count manual and 252,905 medium-low, medium-high and high-count manual cases. The low-count RC had an average LOS of 2.03 days (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.86-2.20) vs. 2.20 days (95%CI: 2.20-2.21) for the low-count MC. 82.4% patients (95%CI: 78.1%-86.8%) from the low-count RC were discharged home vs. 74.2% (95%CI: 74.0%-74.4%) in the low-count MC and 83.6% (95%CI: 83.3%-84.0%) in the high-count MC. Discharge to SNF affected 15.2% (95%CI: 11.1%-19.3%) in the low-count RC vs. 21.0% (95%CI: 20.9%-21.2%) and 15.2% (95%CI: 14.9%-15.4%) in the low-count and medium-high MC, respectively. Conclusion: Patients operated with robotic surgery by surgeons with low yearly volume had a LOS and probability of home discharge similar to that of patients operated with manual surgery by high-volume surgeons. Patients in the robotic group also had a lower rate of SNF discharge compared to the patients in the manual surgery group, with surgeons of similar experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does your approach matter ? Surgeon vs. semi-automated software measured assessment of glenoid retroversion Accuracy Evaluation of Image-Based Virtual Fixtures in Robotic Laminectomy Cloud-Based Three-Dimensional Pattern Analysis and Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures – A Feasibility Study Automated analysis of morpho-functional interbone parameters of the knee based on three dimensional (3D) surface data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1