{"title":"小镇冥河:埃德加·李·马斯特斯,乡村禁闭和田园颠覆","authors":"W. Carroll","doi":"10.1080/14775700.2020.1849924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When Edgar Lee Masters wrote his obituary of small-town provincialism, Spoon River Anthology (1916), the literary movement known as the ‘revolt from the village’ was becoming increasingly defined. Writers like Mary Austin, Willa Cather and, later, Sherwood Anderson penned desolate portraits of rural America, disturbing the nineteenth century idyll of small-town America in favour of a community space ‘caught between industrial progress and gradual oblivion’ (Honaker Herron, 1971). This article explores rural confinement, spatial determinism, and psychological unfulfillment in Masters’ text, all of which are borne directly of Spoon River’s physical and metaphorical isolation. The spatial construction of Masters’ community will be scrutinised, tracing in its pastoral subversion and funereal conceit of the cemetery a melancholy commentary on small-town provincialism. Through consideration of the river as a physical and spiritual barrier, I will conclude that Masters’ text provides a rural portrait in which the small town is entirely beholden to this naturalistic symbol. By considering the various writers and ideologies that run concurrently with Masters, it will be contended that in this particular meeting of waters rural America becomes increasingly difficult to negotiate. Its inhabitants instead grow stagnant, the people embittered, and, in their narratives, a ‘buried life’ (Channell Hilfer, 1969) is dredged up from the silt.","PeriodicalId":114563,"journal":{"name":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small-town Styx: Edgar Lee Masters, Rural Confinement and Pastoral Subversion\",\"authors\":\"W. Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14775700.2020.1849924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT When Edgar Lee Masters wrote his obituary of small-town provincialism, Spoon River Anthology (1916), the literary movement known as the ‘revolt from the village’ was becoming increasingly defined. Writers like Mary Austin, Willa Cather and, later, Sherwood Anderson penned desolate portraits of rural America, disturbing the nineteenth century idyll of small-town America in favour of a community space ‘caught between industrial progress and gradual oblivion’ (Honaker Herron, 1971). This article explores rural confinement, spatial determinism, and psychological unfulfillment in Masters’ text, all of which are borne directly of Spoon River’s physical and metaphorical isolation. The spatial construction of Masters’ community will be scrutinised, tracing in its pastoral subversion and funereal conceit of the cemetery a melancholy commentary on small-town provincialism. Through consideration of the river as a physical and spiritual barrier, I will conclude that Masters’ text provides a rural portrait in which the small town is entirely beholden to this naturalistic symbol. By considering the various writers and ideologies that run concurrently with Masters, it will be contended that in this particular meeting of waters rural America becomes increasingly difficult to negotiate. Its inhabitants instead grow stagnant, the people embittered, and, in their narratives, a ‘buried life’ (Channell Hilfer, 1969) is dredged up from the silt.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative American Studies An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative American Studies An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2020.1849924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2020.1849924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当埃德加·李·马斯特斯(Edgar Lee Masters)写了他关于小镇地方主义的讣告《斯彭河文集》(1916)时,被称为“乡村反抗”的文学运动正变得越来越明确。像玛丽·奥斯汀、薇拉·凯瑟和后来的舍伍德·安德森这样的作家都写过荒凉的美国农村肖像,扰乱了19世纪美国小镇的田园牧歌,支持一个“夹在工业进步和逐渐遗忘之间”的社区空间(Honaker Herron, 1971)。本文探讨马斯特斯文本中的乡村限制、空间决定论和心理不满足,所有这些都直接源于Spoon River的物理和隐喻隔离。马斯特斯社区的空间结构将被仔细审视,在其田园式的颠覆和墓地的葬礼幻想中,人们会对小镇的乡土主义进行忧郁的评论。通过对河流作为物理和精神屏障的考虑,我将得出结论,马斯特斯的文本提供了一幅乡村肖像,其中小镇完全受惠于这个自然主义的象征。考虑到与马斯特斯同时出现的各种作家和意识形态,我们会认为,在这次特别的水会议上,美国农村变得越来越难以谈判。它的居民反而停滞不前,人们痛苦,在他们的叙述中,一种“被埋葬的生活”(channel Hilfer, 1969)被从淤泥中挖掘出来。
Small-town Styx: Edgar Lee Masters, Rural Confinement and Pastoral Subversion
ABSTRACT When Edgar Lee Masters wrote his obituary of small-town provincialism, Spoon River Anthology (1916), the literary movement known as the ‘revolt from the village’ was becoming increasingly defined. Writers like Mary Austin, Willa Cather and, later, Sherwood Anderson penned desolate portraits of rural America, disturbing the nineteenth century idyll of small-town America in favour of a community space ‘caught between industrial progress and gradual oblivion’ (Honaker Herron, 1971). This article explores rural confinement, spatial determinism, and psychological unfulfillment in Masters’ text, all of which are borne directly of Spoon River’s physical and metaphorical isolation. The spatial construction of Masters’ community will be scrutinised, tracing in its pastoral subversion and funereal conceit of the cemetery a melancholy commentary on small-town provincialism. Through consideration of the river as a physical and spiritual barrier, I will conclude that Masters’ text provides a rural portrait in which the small town is entirely beholden to this naturalistic symbol. By considering the various writers and ideologies that run concurrently with Masters, it will be contended that in this particular meeting of waters rural America becomes increasingly difficult to negotiate. Its inhabitants instead grow stagnant, the people embittered, and, in their narratives, a ‘buried life’ (Channell Hilfer, 1969) is dredged up from the silt.