经外侧股下肌入路导航全膝关节置换术的运动学和早期临床结果

Yves Vanderschelden, A. Grassi, S. Bignozzi, Irene Asmonti, S. Zaffagnini
{"title":"经外侧股下肌入路导航全膝关节置换术的运动学和早期临床结果","authors":"Yves Vanderschelden, A. Grassi, S. Bignozzi, Irene Asmonti, S. Zaffagnini","doi":"10.29007/qpnp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A procedure with subvastus lateral approach has been utilized routinely on 60 patients, navigation was used due to the reduced exposure of this technique. Purpose of this study was to evaluate pain, function, and implant kinematics at early follow up of this surgical technique.Tibial and femoral implant planning was based on ligament balance, gaps, and intraoperative kinematics. This approach, on pain and function, was verified at early follow- up. KSS and pain score were obtained at pre-op, 1, 3, 12 months. Data were analyzed with ANOVA for KSS and Chi-square for Pain.No intraoperative complications were registered, no patellar tendon lesion or avulsion was noted. Preoperative average leg alignment was 4±6° varus (range 16; -14), corrected to 0° (range 2; -1). Kinematic analysis showed rollback on lateral compartment, while on medial compartment rollback was lower or negligible until 70° of flexion. Less than 5% had a “Fair” or “Poor” KSS score after 3 months. Preop pain was: 41% severe; 50% moderate; 8% mild and 0% none. At 1 month pain was: 2% severe; 18% moderate; 55% mild and 25% none. After 3 months 50% of patients had mild and 50% had no pain. This data was maintained after 1 year, with 31% of patients with mild and 69% of patients no pain (p<0.05).This approach produced promising early outcomes in terms of pain, ROM and knee function, with less than 5% of patients presenting sub-optimal clinical results at 3- months. On symmetrical implant, medial pivot behavior was observed. Medial ligamental envelope preservation and navigated ligament balancing allow to optimize the medial stability and minimize the post-operative pain.","PeriodicalId":385854,"journal":{"name":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematics and Early Clinical Outcomes of Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty through a Lateral Subvastus Approach\",\"authors\":\"Yves Vanderschelden, A. Grassi, S. Bignozzi, Irene Asmonti, S. Zaffagnini\",\"doi\":\"10.29007/qpnp\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A procedure with subvastus lateral approach has been utilized routinely on 60 patients, navigation was used due to the reduced exposure of this technique. Purpose of this study was to evaluate pain, function, and implant kinematics at early follow up of this surgical technique.Tibial and femoral implant planning was based on ligament balance, gaps, and intraoperative kinematics. This approach, on pain and function, was verified at early follow- up. KSS and pain score were obtained at pre-op, 1, 3, 12 months. Data were analyzed with ANOVA for KSS and Chi-square for Pain.No intraoperative complications were registered, no patellar tendon lesion or avulsion was noted. Preoperative average leg alignment was 4±6° varus (range 16; -14), corrected to 0° (range 2; -1). Kinematic analysis showed rollback on lateral compartment, while on medial compartment rollback was lower or negligible until 70° of flexion. Less than 5% had a “Fair” or “Poor” KSS score after 3 months. Preop pain was: 41% severe; 50% moderate; 8% mild and 0% none. At 1 month pain was: 2% severe; 18% moderate; 55% mild and 25% none. After 3 months 50% of patients had mild and 50% had no pain. This data was maintained after 1 year, with 31% of patients with mild and 69% of patients no pain (p<0.05).This approach produced promising early outcomes in terms of pain, ROM and knee function, with less than 5% of patients presenting sub-optimal clinical results at 3- months. On symmetrical implant, medial pivot behavior was observed. Medial ligamental envelope preservation and navigated ligament balancing allow to optimize the medial stability and minimize the post-operative pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29007/qpnp\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/qpnp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

60例患者常规采用股下外侧入路手术,由于该技术的暴露减少,因此采用导航。本研究的目的是评估这种手术技术早期随访时的疼痛、功能和植入物运动学。胫骨和股骨植入物计划是基于韧带平衡、间隙和术中运动学。这种方法在疼痛和功能上得到了早期随访的验证。术前、1、3、12个月分别获得KSS和疼痛评分。KSS数据采用方差分析,Pain数据采用卡方分析。术中无并发症,无髌骨肌腱损伤或撕脱。术前腿部平均内翻4±6°(范围16;-14),校正到0°(范围2;1)。运动学分析显示侧室回滚,而内侧室回滚较低或可忽略,直到屈曲70°。不到5%的人在3个月后的KSS评分为“一般”或“较差”。术前疼痛严重的占41%;温和的50%;8%轻度,0%无。1个月时疼痛:重度2%;温和的18%;55%轻度,25%无。3个月后,50%的患者有轻微疼痛,50%的患者没有疼痛。该数据在1年后保持不变,31%的患者有轻微疼痛,69%的患者无疼痛(p<0.05)。这种方法在疼痛、ROM和膝关节功能方面产生了有希望的早期结果,不到5%的患者在3个月时出现了不理想的临床结果。在对称种植体上,观察到内侧支点行为。内侧韧带包膜保护和导航韧带平衡可以优化内侧稳定性并减少术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kinematics and Early Clinical Outcomes of Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty through a Lateral Subvastus Approach
A procedure with subvastus lateral approach has been utilized routinely on 60 patients, navigation was used due to the reduced exposure of this technique. Purpose of this study was to evaluate pain, function, and implant kinematics at early follow up of this surgical technique.Tibial and femoral implant planning was based on ligament balance, gaps, and intraoperative kinematics. This approach, on pain and function, was verified at early follow- up. KSS and pain score were obtained at pre-op, 1, 3, 12 months. Data were analyzed with ANOVA for KSS and Chi-square for Pain.No intraoperative complications were registered, no patellar tendon lesion or avulsion was noted. Preoperative average leg alignment was 4±6° varus (range 16; -14), corrected to 0° (range 2; -1). Kinematic analysis showed rollback on lateral compartment, while on medial compartment rollback was lower or negligible until 70° of flexion. Less than 5% had a “Fair” or “Poor” KSS score after 3 months. Preop pain was: 41% severe; 50% moderate; 8% mild and 0% none. At 1 month pain was: 2% severe; 18% moderate; 55% mild and 25% none. After 3 months 50% of patients had mild and 50% had no pain. This data was maintained after 1 year, with 31% of patients with mild and 69% of patients no pain (p<0.05).This approach produced promising early outcomes in terms of pain, ROM and knee function, with less than 5% of patients presenting sub-optimal clinical results at 3- months. On symmetrical implant, medial pivot behavior was observed. Medial ligamental envelope preservation and navigated ligament balancing allow to optimize the medial stability and minimize the post-operative pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does your approach matter ? Surgeon vs. semi-automated software measured assessment of glenoid retroversion Accuracy Evaluation of Image-Based Virtual Fixtures in Robotic Laminectomy Cloud-Based Three-Dimensional Pattern Analysis and Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures – A Feasibility Study Automated analysis of morpho-functional interbone parameters of the knee based on three dimensional (3D) surface data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1